BitMine Purchases Additional $73 Million Worth of ETH, Raising Its Share of Circulating Supply to 4.8%

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-17Last updated on 2026-07-17

Abstract

BitMine Immersion Technologies (NYSE: BMNR), an Ethereum treasury company chaired by Fundstrat's Tom Lee, purchased an additional 42,197 ETH worth approximately $73 million over the past week. This acquisition brings the company's total ETH holdings to 5,742,237, representing 4.8% of Ethereum's circulating supply. The firm's total crypto and other holdings are valued at $11.1 billion, including its ETH (valued at $1,800 per coin), 206 BTC, a $180 million stake in Beast Industries, and a $71 million stake in Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS). It also holds $527 million in cash and marketable securities. Notably, the amount of ETH staked by BitMine remained unchanged at 4,879,157 ETH, despite the overall increase in holdings. The company continues its consistent accumulation strategy, aiming to reach its stated goal of controlling 5% of ETH's total supply.

Author: The Defiant Team

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide's Insight: BitMine Immersion Technologies (NYSE: BMNR) purchased 42,197 ETH worth approximately $73 million over the past week, bringing its total holdings to 5,742,237 ETH, or 4.8% of Ethereum's circulating supply. This Ethereum treasury company, chaired by Fundstrat's Tom Lee, is steadily progressing towards its stated target of holding 5% of the supply with its consistent weekly accumulation strategy.

Accumulates $73 Million Worth of ETH in One Week

BitMine Immersion Technologies (NYSE: BMNR), the Ethereum treasury company chaired by Fundstrat's chairman Tom Lee, purchased 42,197 ETH worth approximately $73 million in the past week. According to the company's Monday holdings update, this accumulation increased BitMine's total ETH holdings to 5,742,237 ETH, representing about 4.8% of Ethereum's circulating supply.

BitMine's official account disclosed that the company's total crypto and other holdings are valued at $11.1 billion. This includes its ETH holdings valued at $1,800 per token, 206 BTC, a $180 million equity stake in Beast Industries, and a $71 million equity stake in Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS). The company also holds $527 million in cash and marketable securities.

Staked Holdings Unchanged

Notably, BitMine's total staked ETH amount is 4,879,157 ETH, unchanged from the previous week—despite the growth in total holdings, the company did not increase its staking position.

This latest purchase continues the consistent accumulation strategy, solidifying BitMine's position as the largest corporate holder of ETH. The Defiant previously reported in June on Lee publicly defending the company's funding model (after insiders warned of a cash shortfall). Lee has also publicly characterized crypto assets as a "wartime store of value" in his comments.

At this pace, BitMine is steadily advancing towards its proclaimed goal of controlling 5% of ETH's total supply. BitMine's stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker BMNR.

The scale of the $73 million purchase and the 4.8% share of circulation are consistent across data from multiple independent market trackers, although BitMine's official post did not separate this week's purchase amount from the cumulative total.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

From Somersaults to Working 24/7: We Saw the ‘Working-Class’ Aura in Robots at WAIC

From performing acrobatics to working 24/7: Robots at WAIC are getting down to business. This year's World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai showcased a significant shift in the robotics industry. While "show-off" robots that dance, play music, or compete in sports are still present, the dominant trend is now practical, task-oriented machines. Hundreds of wheeled and humanoid robots were deployed as guides, baristas, factory workers, and even traffic controllers, moving beyond mere demonstrations to highlight real-world "work capabilities." The focus has pivoted from showcasing technical parameters to pursuing mass production and industrial落地 (landing/implementation). This transition presents major challenges. First, deploying powerful AI models onto robots requires overcoming hardware limitations in computing power and latency. Second, robots demand complex, integrated systems for real-time perception and control. Third, achieving reliable mass production necessitates unprecedented industry-wide collaboration on standards and supply chains. A key bottleneck identified by industry leaders is the robot's "brain"—its AI and cognitive capabilities. While hardware and basic movement ("little brain") have advanced rapidly, the higher-level intelligence for understanding complex instructions and adapting to unstructured environments is progressing more slowly. Companies are investing heavily in developing more advanced "brain" systems, but fully autonomous operation in dynamic settings remains a work in progress. Cost is another critical hurdle. While some consumer-oriented humanoid robots are now priced under $15,000, capable industrial models often cost $50,000 or more. The industry consensus is that bringing robots into unstructured home environments for tasks like comprehensive cleaning is still at least five years away due to technical, safety, and cost barriers. Therefore, 2026 is being called the "first year of mass production," but primarily for industrial and specific commercial applications. WAIC 2026 served less as a stage for spectacular tricks and more as a serious examination of robots' commercial viability, marking their transition from laboratory prototypes to real-world products that must prove their value through stable, repetitive work.

marsbit1h ago

From Somersaults to Working 24/7: We Saw the ‘Working-Class’ Aura in Robots at WAIC

marsbit1h ago

Live-Action Short Series Forced onto the Big Screen by AI

Live-action short dramas, originally a popular online format, are now attempting to enter the cinema. Several top IPs like "What a Good Girl" and "One Family, Same Class" have received approval for film adaptations. This shift is driven by several pressures within the short drama industry. After rapid growth fueled by low costs and platform support, the sector now faces a slowdown with fewer hits and reduced investment. A major disruptor is the explosive rise of AI-generated short dramas, which dominate new releases and challenge the traditional model with their speed and low cost. Platform policy changes, such as adjustments to revenue guarantees, have further squeezed producers. In this context, film adaptation is seen as a potential new growth path. It offers a chance to extend a short-lived online hit into a longer-lasting IP asset, moving beyond the "fast production, fast consumption" cycle. Established short dramas bring pre-validated stories and emotional appeal to the table, potentially lowering the risk for film investors. However, significant challenges remain. Translating a fast-paced, fragmented viewing experience designed for phones into a compelling cinematic narrative is difficult. Past attempts by popular TV shows and variety programs to make films have often failed due to weak content. A short drama's massive online viewership does not guarantee box office success, as cinema requires a higher commitment of time and money from audiences. Ultimately, the success of these adaptations will depend not on their original popularity, but on their ability to tell complete, emotionally resonant stories that meet the standards of the theatrical market.

marsbit3h ago

Live-Action Short Series Forced onto the Big Screen by AI

marsbit3h ago

Asymmetry of Algorithmic Agency: When AI Makes Decisions for You, You Don't Even Have the Right to Oppose

As AI increasingly makes decisions on our behalf, a critical asymmetry emerges: the entities deploying these systems understand and refine their algorithms, while individuals merely endure the consequences. This article explores the three layers of this "algorithmic agency asymmetry." First, opacity shields system goals, incentives, and flaws, creating a "black box fallacy" where outputs seem objective. Second, algorithms amplify historical biases, repackaging past inequalities in a seemingly neutral, computational form. Third, recursive systems lead to "algorithmic drift," where users train the system and are simultaneously trained by it, shaping their own choices and behaviors. This asymmetry has profound implications, extending into hiring, education, policing, and daily life. Users adapt to what the system rewards, but only see the end result—a score, recommendation, or price—without understanding the underlying logic or manipulated conditions. To rebalance this power dynamic, the article proposes policy interventions: 1) Meaningful transparency and explainability for users affected by AI decisions. 2) Enforceable impact assessments before deploying high-risk systems. 3) Genuine human oversight with the power to challenge outputs. 4) Mandatory post-deployment monitoring and auditing. 5) Outright bans on manipulative or exploitative systems. Finally, fostering widespread "algorithmic literacy" is essential public infrastructure. Ultimately, this asymmetry is a structural power imbalance. Good policy cannot eliminate it but can narrow the gap by making automated influence visible, contestable, auditable, and governable.

marsbit3h ago

Asymmetry of Algorithmic Agency: When AI Makes Decisions for You, You Don't Even Have the Right to Oppose

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片