Joel Monegro: Moving On From FTX

mediumPublished on 2022-11-16Last updated on 2022-11-16

Abstract

It’s proof that it’s not just an idealistic belief, it’s a pragmatic concern. It’s another example of why decentralized is better.

Like many of you, we were surprised to see the rapid collapse of FTX, one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. The complete details of what happened will take a while to unravel. We already know it’s not good. But we also know that crypto is bigger than any single company, no matter how large. And given what we’re discovering, it’s better this collapse happened now, and not years from now.

We were surprised but not shocked – not because we knew FTX was fraudulent, but because we know that centralized custodial services are vulnerable to human misjudgment, hubris, and misaligned incentives. The financial industry is one of the most highly regulated in the world precisely because of the long history of principal-agent crimes and catastrophes. But it’s not limited to finance: from banks to social networks to governments, the larger a “centralized” system becomes, the more likely it is to be corrupted and the greater the scale of the consequences.

At the core of our investment thesis is the belief that sovereign networks built on open-source protocols are our best shot at decentralizing data, wealth, and power. Bitcoin’s founding principle, informed by the global financial collapse in 2008, is to favor peer-to-peer networks over intermediary institutions; middlemachines over middlemen. So we invest almost exclusively in trustless, non-custodial service models across the stack: from base-layer stores of value, smart contract networks and developer tools, to proper DeFi protocols and non-custodial applications and interfaces where users truly own their data. We share this belief with every passionate entrepreneur, builder and user who chooses crypto and web3 because the architecture matters a lot more than getting rich quickly.

Indeed, centralization has been the root cause of every blow up in 2022 as none of them were true decentralized systems. Luna looked and talked like a protocol, but besides poor cryptoeconomic mechanisms, its reserves were centrally and poorly managed by a handful of fallible individuals. 3AC was overleveraged, and the centralized lenders (Celsius, Voyager, BlockFi, etc.) all suffered from the same affliction: human mismanagement and hubris. Wolves in DeFi clothing.

FTX is the worst of the bunch, and it will take the market many months to absorb the consequences of its collapse, starting with the users who lost assets. Outside of those users, falling asset prices affect everybody in different ways. But it’s not as bad as losing assets, and capitulations are a healthy way to flush bad assets and bad actors from the industry, at least in retrospect.

For Builders, if you’re working on truly decentralized systems, this event validates your work. Know that you’re building the right thing for the right reasons. Keep building networks, protocols and applications that protect users from corrupt individuals. Many users will leave for a while in disappointment, but those who remain will appreciate your work all the more, and those who’ve yet to come will enter a safer, more reliable web3. Keep building with confidence. Everyone in the know values your work today. Everyone else will soon.

For Users, whether you were directly affected or not, get smart about self-custody if you haven’t already. Internalize the difference between true dapps and custodial services. Know that the FTX collapse is the failure of a centralized intermediary, not a failure of blockchain systems or decentralized protocols, which continued functioning seamlessly through this debacle. Some of us remember Mt. Gox and a time when exchange blow-ups were routine. This is the largest-scale blow up to date, but until we have a consistent regulatory regime for centralized exchanges, it’s unlikely to be the last. On-chain will remain the safest place to be.

For Everyone, welcome to bear valley. We’re entering the phase of peak disillusionment. Many will leave. Many will be wiped out. The press will be damning and lawmakers will try to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Sentiment will hit all-time-lows. But remember that sentiment is always the worst at the bottom. And even when you’re through the bottom of the valley, the path forward is nevertheless an uphill battle. So it’s not going to be easy, but that’s why it’s going to be rewarding. When all is said and done, only the strongest remain, and that’s a good thing. You’ll remember and respect each other when it’s over. OG’s are built in bear markets.

For us, we’ll continue investing in decentralization at the same pace and with the same conviction as we have been since the beginning, choosing to work with entrepreneurs and communities who share these beliefs. Six years ago, when we started Placeholder, we could only talk about the benefits of decentralization from an ideological perspective. Many times we’ve left money on the table by passing on businesses that don’t fit that thesis. And we know a lot of the entrepreneurs we work with face similar tensions. It’s hard not to take the “centralized shortcut” to success, when it’s harder to build decentralized systems. But the FTX disaster is yet another example of exactly why we shouldn’t compromise on our core beliefs. It’s proof that it’s not just an idealistic belief, it’s a pragmatic concern. It’s another example of why decentralized is better.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

AI Is Eliminating 'Entertainment for the Poor' This article discusses the rising cost of video gaming, arguing that AI is making digital entertainment increasingly expensive. It follows the example of a frugal gamer who, accustomed to waiting for discounts and buying second-hand games, now faces a new reality. Video game consoles like the PS5 Pro and Switch 2 are increasing in price post-launch, breaking the traditional pattern of降价 over time. Game prices are also rising, with major titles like GTA 6 launching at $80. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards eliminating physical media, exemplified by Sony's plan to stop PS disc production by 2028. This shift blocks the二手 market, a key cost-saving avenue for players. Even Valve's anticipated affordable Steam Machine launched with a high price and disappointing specs. Manufacturers cite inflation, supply chain issues, and rising development costs, but a core driver is the AI boom. AI data centers now consume semiconductor and memory resources once prioritized for consumer electronics like game consoles. This competition from a more profitable sector drives up hardware costs. Additionally, developing modern AAA games with massive teams over many years is astronomically expensive, pushing publishers towards digital-only distribution and subscription models to secure recurring revenue. The article suggests this trend extends beyond gaming. Video streaming, music platforms, cloud storage, and AI tools are increasingly locked behind complex subscription tiers. While AI promises future benefits, it is currently making digital entertainment and services more costly. The era of progressively cheaper, accessible online entertainment is ending, forcing consumers to pay more upfront for future technological promises.

marsbit13m ago

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

marsbit13m ago

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

South Korea's AI-driven bull market has taken a sharp downturn, severely impacting SK Hynix's stock and prompting regulatory tightening in both Hong Kong and South Korea on single-stock leveraged products. The CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) ETF, once the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF with over HKD 130 billion in assets, saw its value plummet by over 80% as SK Hynix shares fell nearly 46% from their June peak, erasing more than HKD 100 billion. In response, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) revised its regulatory framework. Starting August 3rd, fixed 2x leverage for single-stock leveraged and inverse products will shift to a dynamic "flexible leverage" mechanism, where daily leverage can vary up to a maximum of 2x. This aims to balance market development with investor protection but has sparked debate about changes to the products' core features and potential reduced appeal for risk-seeking investors. Simultaneously, South Korean authorities announced plans to further restrict single-stock leveraged ETFs following two consecutive days of market circuit breakers. Proposed measures include capping individual investors' allocations to such products at 20% of their total financial investment assets, increasing trading costs, and enhancing suitability requirements. The Finance Minister publicly apologized, acknowledging insufficient initial risk assessment. Analysts note that while the long-term fundamentals for South Korean semiconductor firms like SK Hynix remain solid, short-term market volatility is heightened due to concentrated leveraged bets and shifting global risk sentiment. The regulatory moves in both markets signal a clear shift from encouraging innovation towards prioritizing risk control, reminding investors of the amplified risks inherent in leveraged products.

marsbit19m ago

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

marsbit19m ago

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

"The Privatization of Human Civilization" The article critiques how AI companies like Anthropic are systematically acquiring and digitizing millions of books—sometimes by destroying physical copies—to build proprietary training datasets for models like Claude. While a lawsuit resulted in a settlement, the author argues the deeper issue transcends copyright: it is about the privatization and centralized control of human knowledge and civilization. This process coincides with a powerful Silicon Valley ideology, exemplified by Marc Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" and movements like e/acc (Effective Accelerationism). This worldview frames technological growth and speed as inherently moral, portraying caution, regulation, and public dissent as obstacles to progress. It often envisions intelligence itself, rather than human well-being, as the ultimate goal, potentially sidelining present human concerns. Figures like Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin express skepticism towards democratic processes as too slow, suggesting more centralized, founder-led governance is efficient. This logic extends to AI, where a small team within a company defines the model's "constitution"—its rules, values, and definitions of truth and safety—effectively governing how millions understand the world. Thus, the scanned books symbolize a new form of control. Knowledge isn't erased but is ingested into private, opaque systems. The original, decentralized, and contestable nature of books and public knowledge is replaced by a curated, company-controlled output. The public's access to their own cultural heritage becomes mediated by corporate AI, which remembers civilization only in the form its creators dictate. This is not book-burning but a subtler, potentially more complete privatization of human memory and understanding.

marsbit28m ago

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片