Why Crypto Farms in Georgia Have Become a Subject of Dispute Over the Energy System

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-23Last updated on 2026-08-23

Abstract

Former National Bank president and opposition politician Roman Gotsiridze claims cryptocurrency mining farms in Georgia are straining the national energy system while contributing almost nothing to the state budget, operating on tax and electricity tariff privileges. He states the farms consume about 6% of domestically generated electricity, or roughly 1 billion kilowatt-hours annually—equivalent to the consumption of Batumi—maintaining a constant load on the grid linked to frequent infrastructure failures. While not advocating a blanket ban, Gotsiridze argues mining should operate under general business conditions, competing and paying taxes. He alleges the largest farm is linked to Bidzina Ivanishvili's ruling party clan and benefits from unjustified preferential treatment. His core demand is an immediate ban on cryptocurrency mining in free industrial zones, removing its privileged status, as the sector consumes vast energy with minimal fiscal return for Georgia.

Opposition politician and former president of the National Bank, Roman Gotsiridze, stated that crypto farms in Georgia create a dangerous load on the country's energy sector, contribute almost nothing to the budget, and rely on tax and tariff privileges.

Gotsiridze Accused Cryptomining of Putting Pressure on the Energy Sector

According to Roman Gotsiridze, cryptocurrency and mining themselves should not be a prohibited sphere if businesses operate under general conditions, compete with other industries, and bring real income to the country. However, as the politician claims, the situation in Georgia is arranged differently: crypto-mining companies are exempt from taxes and receive electricity on preferential terms.

According to Gotsiridze's estimate, crypto farms contribute almost nothing to the budget but constantly pressure the energy system; without tax and energy privileges, such companies would quickly cease operations.

Gotsiridze calls such enterprises consumers that take resources away from the energy system and the state budget. In his logic, the benefit of a regular economy is visible through several signs:

  • Investments.
  • Taxes.
  • Bank transactions.
  • Movement of US dollars or other currencies.

In the case of crypto farms, the politician asserts, the state receives disproportionately little compared to the amount of electricity spent on extracting digital assets, including Bitcoin.

Approximately 6% of Electricity and Constant Load

Roman Gotsiridze separately emphasizes the operating mode of crypto farms. Such facilities, according to him, do not stop either in winter or summer and keep the energy system under stable load around the clock. The politician links this to the increasing number of accidents in the energy infrastructure.

Gotsiridze's estimates on the load look like this:

  • Indicator: share of electricity produced in Georgia. Value: approximately 6%. Comment: when taking into account Abkhazia's consumption, the indicator, as Gotsiridze claims, becomes higher.
  • Indicator: annual consumption of crypto farms. Value: about 1 billion kilowatt-hours. Comment: the politician compares this volume with the annual consumption of Batumi and considers such a load too serious given the minimal return for the budget.

Political Context and the Demand for a Ban

Gotsiridze also claims that crypto farms are backed by representatives of the business clan of the ruling party "Georgian Dream." He links the largest crypto farm in the Gldani district to Bidzina Ivanishvili, asserting that he was the one behind its establishment.

The mining market overall is known for large technological players, including Bitfury, but the focus of Gotsiridze's statement is not a specific brand, but the very model of operation of such facilities in Georgia:

  • Preferential electricity.
  • Tax concessions.
  • Constant load on the grid.

The dispute around mining has long gone beyond the narrow topic of cryptocurrencies: similar discussions about the cost of energy for the industry are taking place in both Europe and the United States of America. For Georgia, according to Gotsiridze's position, the main question sounds simpler: should the country support a business that consumes enormous amounts of electricity but hardly fills the budget.

Cryptocurrency mining in free industrial zones must be banned immediately, declared Roman Gotsiridze.

Thus, the politician proposes not a point adjustment of conditions, but a tough solution: remove crypto-mining from free industrial zones and deprive the industry of a regime that he considers unjustifiably privileged.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Roman Gotsiridze, what is the main criticism against cryptocurrency mining farms in Georgia?

AAccording to Roman Gotsiridze, the main criticism is that cryptocurrency mining farms place a dangerous load on the country's energy system, contribute almost nothing to the state budget, and rely on preferential tax and electricity tariffs to operate.

QWhat specific privileges do cryptocurrency mining companies in Georgia receive according to the article?

AAccording to the article, cryptocurrency mining companies in Georgia are exempt from taxes and receive electricity on preferential, or discounted, terms.

QHow much of Georgia's produced electricity is estimated to be consumed by crypto farms, according to Gotsiridze's claims?

AAccording to Roman Gotsiridze, crypto farms consume approximately 6% of the electricity produced in Georgia. This percentage is said to be even higher when accounting for consumption in Abkhazia.

QWhich political figure and business clan is alleged by Gotsiridze to be behind the major crypto farms?

ARoman Gotsiridze alleges that representatives of the business clan of the ruling party 'Georgian Dream' are behind the crypto farms. He specifically links the largest farm in the Gldani district to Bidzina Ivanishvili, the party's founder.

QWhat specific policy action does Roman Gotsiridze propose regarding cryptocurrency mining in Georgia?

ARoman Gotsiridze proposes an immediate ban on cryptocurrency mining within free industrial zones. He advocates for removing the industry from these zones and stripping it of the preferential regime he deems unjustified.

Related Reads

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ru22m ago

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ru22m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit32m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit32m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

The article traces the decade-long path of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, to its potential launch as the first privacy coin spot ETF, with Grayscale's ZCSH filing in August 2026. It argues ZEC's suitability stemmed not from regulatory acceptance of its privacy technology, but from its centralized, institutional structure from inception—a commercial company (ECC) with venture capital backing and a Founder's Reward—making it easier to package than decentralized alternatives. Three key institutions, intertwined in a network, drove the process: Grayscale (owned by DCG, an early ZEC investor), which had held ZEC in a trust since 2017; Coinbase, providing custody, prime brokerage, derivatives, and venture investment; and ZODL, a new for-profit entity formed in 2026 when ECC's core development team split from the non-profit foundation. The major regulatory hurdle was SEC scrutiny (2023-2026) over ZEC's historical structure, which resembled an unregistered investment contract due to automatic block rewards to ECC and the Foundation. This was resolved through governance changes (NU6 upgrade in 2024) that ended direct funding and shifted control to community voting, coinciding with a broader shift in SEC enforcement policy. Notably, the law firm Davis Polk represented both the Zcash Foundation in its SEC defense and Grayscale in the ETF filing. The push is also driven by DCG's dire financial needs amid Genesis bankruptcy lawsuits, seeking high-fee products (the ZEC ETF charges 2.5%). Concurrently, major mining operations by entities like Cypherpunk Technologies (backed by Winklevoss Capital) and DCG's Fortitude Mining expanded, motivated by profitability and aiming to influence the network. The article concludes with irony: to become a compliant ETF asset, ZEC must shed its core privacy feature for the fund's holdings, which will be held in transparent, auditable addresses. Wall Street is not adopting privacy technology but packaging the *concept* of privacy into a tradable, fee-generating financial product. The transformation was not a single master plan but the result of a network of aligned interests capitalizing on regulatory, governance, and market shifts over ten years.

marsbit42m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

417 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片