HumidiFi Suspends Trading Followingdentin Network, Limiting Impact to Internal Funds

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-22Last updated on 2026-08-22

Abstract

HumidiFi, a prominent decentralized exchange on Solana, has temporarily suspended trading on its platform following a security breach within its network. The company stated that the incident was limited to its own internal funds and did not affect client or third-party assets. According to its official announcement on X, the team is still investigating the attack and has not disclosed specific details or labeled it as a hack. Trading remains paused. Data from DefiLlama shows HumidiFi processed around $213.79 million in trades over the past 24 hours and had a 30-day trading volume of approximately $2.468 billion. Despite the incident, the exchange's native token, WET, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge nearly 192% to about $5.49 million, although its price fell 8.66% to $0.07173. This price is roughly 78% below its all-time high from December 10, 2025. This security breach follows a recent failed token sale on the Jupiter platform, which was canceled after an attacker used automated wallets to purchase nearly all available tokens. HumidiFi canceled the sale, vowing a new, fairer token distribution for legitimate participants. The report notes an increasing frequency of security investigations in the digital asset sector for Q2 2026, with a record number of incidents causing significant financial damage.

HumidiFi, one of the most active decentralized exchanges on Solana, has suspended trading on its platform following a report of a dent in its network security.

The exchange claims the damage was limited to its own funds and did not affect client or third-party assets.

What Exactly Did HumidiFi Announce?

HumidiFi reported via its official X account that a portion of its internal network was compromised, stating that the team is still investigating. It informed its followers that the impact of the attack was limited to the company's own funds and that neither client nor third-party assets were affected.

Trading on the platform is currently suspended, but beyond that, the company has not disclosed dent details. They also did not officially label the incident as a hack or provide a dollar estimate of the losses.

According to DefiLlama, over the last 24 hours, HumidiFi processed trades worth approximately $213.79 million, and its 30-day trading volume reached around $2.468 billion.

Meanwhile, the exchange's native token, WET, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge by nearly 192% to roughly $5.49 million, despite its price falling 8.66% to $0.07173. The token is currently about 78% below its all-time high of $0.336 from December 10, 2025.

What Other Security dents Has HumidiFi Reported?

Prior to this attack, HumidiFi organized a token sale on the Jupiter platform, which failed quickly after a bad actor scooped up nearly all available tokens using automated wallets.

According to Bubblemaps, at least 1,100 of the roughly 1,530 wallets that participated in the sale exhibited dents of coordinated funding and transaction timing.

HumidiFi fully canceled the sale, writing in a statement posted on its X account: "The sniper will get nothing." However, according to Cryptopolitan, $1.39 million in USDC had been raised before the event was called off.

Following the project's cancellation, the team promised to organize a new token launch and a proportional airdrop for genuine buyers.

Cryptopolitan reported on the increasing frequency of investigations into digital asset-related projects in the second quarter of 2026, which concluded with a record number of dents, around 83 separate security incidents, and damages of about $775 million. According to DefiLlama,

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat happened to the decentralized exchange HumidiFi on Solana, and what was the immediate action taken?

AHumidiFi, one of the most active decentralized exchanges on Solana, suspended trading on its platform following a reported security incident in its network.

QAccording to HumidiFi, what was the scope of the impact from the security incident?

AAccording to HumidiFi, the damage was limited to the company's own funds and did not affect client assets or third-party assets.

QWhat was the trading volume of HumidiFi in the last 24 hours prior to the incident, as per DefiLlama?

AAccording to DefiLlama, HumidiFi processed trades worth approximately $213.79 million in the last 24 hours prior to the incident.

QWhat happened during HumidiFi's token sale on the Jupiter platform prior to this security incident?

APrior to this security incident, HumidiFi's token sale on the Jupiter platform failed quickly after a malicious actor bought nearly all available tokens using automated wallets. The sale was subsequently canceled by HumidiFi.

QWhat broader trend in digital asset security was reported by Cryptopolitan for Q2 2026?

ACryptopolitan reported a growing frequency of investigations into digital asset-related projects in Q2 2026, which ended with a record number of approximately 83 separate security incidents causing damage of about $775 million.

Related Reads

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片