Le chef de l'OCC promet les règles définitives GENIUS pour novembre

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-19Last updated on 2026-08-19

Abstract

Le contrôleur de la monnaie américain, Jonathan Gould, a annoncé que l'OCC publierait d'ici novembre les règles définitives pour la mise en œuvre de la loi GENIUS sur les stablecoins de paiement. Prononcée lors du Wyoming Blockchain Symposium, cette déclaration fait suite à la proposition de règles dévoilée par l'OCC en février, sur laquelle l'agence a recueilli les retours de l'industrie crypto. La loi GENIUS, promulguée en juillet 2025, vise à établir un cadre réglementaire fédéral pour les stablecoins et requiert l'action de plusieurs agences, dont l'OCC, le Trésor, la FDIC et la Fed. Si l'OCC avance rapidement, d'autres régulateurs ont pris du retard dans la publication de leurs règles finales, ce qui pourrait créer des incertitudes pour les émetteurs alors que la loi entre en vigueur en janvier 2027. Gould a ajouté que l'OCC pourrait commencer à traiter les demandes d'agrément des émetteurs à partir de 2027.

Le contrôleur de la monnaie américain, Jonathan Gould, a déclaré que son agence publierait les règles définitives liées à la mise en œuvre d'une loi sur les stablecoins de paiement d'ici novembre.

S'exprimant mercredi lors du Symposium sur la Blockchain du Wyoming, le régulateur a déclaré qu'après la proposition du Bureau du Contrôleur de la Monnaie (OCC) pour mettre en œuvre la loi « Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins » (GENIUS), l'OCC publierait des règles finalisées avant l'entrée en vigueur de la loi prévue en janvier 2027.

Gould a déclaré que l'OCC « aura une règle finale publiée d'ici novembre » alors que l'agence examine les retours de l'industrie cryptographique suite à la publication de ses règles proposées en février. Il a ajouté qu'il s'attend à ce que le régulateur puisse commencer à traiter les demandes liées aux émetteurs de stablecoins à partir de 2027.

La loi GENIUS, promulguée en juillet 2025, vise à créer un cadre réglementaire pour les stablecoins de paiement aux États-Unis, exigeant des règles des agences gouvernementales supervisant ces produits, y compris l'OCC, le Département du Trésor, la Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) et le Conseil de la Réserve Fédérale.

Bien que l'OCC ait avancé en février avec une proposition de 376 pages pour mettre en œuvre GENIUS, les agences gouvernementales n'ont que jusqu'au 18 janvier pour finaliser les réglementations, date à laquelle la loi entre en vigueur. Plusieurs régulateurs ont déjà publié des propositions et recueilli des retours du public concernant la mise en œuvre de GENIUS, mais n'ont pas publié de règles finalisées en juillet, ce qui pourrait entraîner une incertitude réglementaire pour les émetteurs de stablecoins.

En rapport : L'OCC approuve la charte fiduciaire pour l'entreprise crypto de la famille Trump

Trending Cryptos

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit10m ago

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit10m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit25m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit25m ago

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbit34m ago

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbit34m ago

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbit35m ago

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbit35m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit49m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy GENIUS

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Genius (GENIUS) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Genius (GENIUS) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Genius (GENIUS)After purchasing your Genius (GENIUS), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Genius (GENIUS)Easily trade Genius (GENIUS) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2026.04.29Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of GENIUS (GENIUS) are presented below.