Ethereum Foundation warns some tools may break with Glamsterdam upgrade

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-18Last updated on 2026-08-18

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) warns that the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, which introduces significant gas-model changes via EIP-8037, may cause some wallets, indexers, and gas estimators to break. Tools relying on a hardcoded maximum gas limit must be updated, as the changes separate state-gas costs for operations that create new state. While a standard ETH transfer to an existing account remains 21,000 gas, sending to a new account incurs an additional charge. Developers are urged to test their software on the Plataberget testnet. The upgrade also includes enshrined proposer-builder separation, block-level access lists, and increased contract and initialization-code size limits.

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has warned that some wallets, indexers and gas estimators may break because of gas-model changes in the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade.

On Monday, the EF’s Protocol DevOps team said any tool relying on a hardcoded maximum gas limit “will break” and must be updated. It urged developers to test their systems on Plataberget, a public testnet intended to operate for several months.

According to upgrade tracker Forkcast, Plataberget launched on Aug. 13. Meanwhile, the Glamsterdam fork is scheduled to activate on the network on Thursday, before its deployment on the Sepolia and Hoodi testnets.

The EF’s Protocol DevOps team said EIP-8037 would introduce a separate state-gas dimension for operations that create new state. Under the changes, a plain ETH transfer to an existing account would still cost 21,000 gas, while sending ETH to a new account would incur an additional state-gas charge.

The foundation said developers should revisit software that assumes 21,000 gas covers every ETH transfer or uses only one gas dimension when estimating transaction costs.

Glamsterdam also includes enshrined proposer-builder separation, block-level access lists and increased limits for contract and initialization-code sizes.

Related: Ethereum Foundation hits ‘Glamsterdam’ milestones, names new protocol leads

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
dos
DAPPOSDOS
jst
JUSTJST

Related Questions

QWhat is the main warning issued by the Ethereum Foundation regarding the Glamsterdam upgrade?

AThe Ethereum Foundation warned that some wallets, indexers, and gas estimators may break due to gas-model changes introduced in the upgrade, specifically any tools relying on a hardcoded maximum gas limit.

QWhat testnet did the EF recommend for developers to test their systems before the Glamsterdam upgrade?

AThe EF's Protocol DevOps team urged developers to test their systems on Plataberget, a public testnet intended to operate for several months.

QWhat key change does EIP-8037 introduce regarding gas costs?

AEIP-8037 introduces a separate state-gas dimension for operations that create new state. This means a plain ETH transfer to an existing account costs 21,000 gas, while sending ETH to a new account incurs an additional state-gas charge.

QWhich tools or software does the foundation specifically advise developers to revisit?

AThe foundation advises developers to revisit any software that assumes 21,000 gas covers every ETH transfer or uses only one gas dimension when estimating transaction costs.

QBesides gas-model changes, what are some other features included in the Glamsterdam upgrade?

AGlamsterdam also includes enshrined proposer-builder separation, block-level access lists, and increased limits for contract and initialization-code sizes.

Related Reads

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbit1m ago

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbit1m ago

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

Experts warn that AI agents could dramatically lower the cost and scale of attacks against cryptocurrency holders. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium, industry figures noted that automation allows malicious actors to simultaneously search for vulnerabilities in wallets, passwords, and networks across a vast number of potential victims. Ryan Kirkly, co-founder and CEO of Global Settlement Network, criticized the industry for often viewing autonomous agents only as beneficial tools while underestimating their offensive potential. Data from TRM Labs shows the crypto industry experienced a record 207 hacks in the first half of 2026, causing $972 million in losses, with the number doubling from the same period in 2025. Vice President of Technical Operations at Web3 Foundation, Bill Labun, agreed that the efficiency of autonomous systems also benefits attackers. While defenders like the Ethereum Foundation are using AI agents for security audits, the need for human verification remains high due to false positives. A major concern is granting AI agents direct access to financial tools and personal data. New services like MetaMask's Agent Wallet, which allows AI to manage assets within set limits, introduce risks such as prompt injection attacks. Panelists also highlighted risks from metadata leakage, which can compromise privacy even on private networks, and the unresolved issue of legal liability for an AI agent's autonomous and potentially irreversible actions. Lack of user trust, due to AI's tendency to "hallucinate" or generate incorrect information, was cited as a key barrier to widespread adoption.

cryptonews.ru2m ago

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

cryptonews.ru2m ago

American economic magazine Forbes stated that bitcoin could become a neutral reserve asset for the global economy!

American business and economic magazine Forbes has suggested that Bitcoin could potentially play a significant role as a neutral reserve asset in the global financial system. According to the publication, Bitcoin might offer an alternative to the growing debates surrounding the US dollar's status as the world's reserve currency and the current system's reliance on US government bonds. Forbes notes that the dollar's reserve status grants the US significant advantages but also highlights the inherent "Triffin dilemma," where the US struggles to balance its domestic economic needs with global demand for the reserve currency. The current system draws global capital to the US, allowing for cheaper imports but weakening domestic competitiveness and worsening the trade deficit. The post-gold standard system has been sustained by US bonds, yet fundamental contradictions remain. The magazine argues that stablecoins cannot fully address the reserve asset issue as they are largely backed by US Treasuries. While gold is a neutral reserve asset, it has limitations regarding mobility, verification, and transactional efficiency. In contrast, Bitcoin, with its fixed supply, lack of need for state credit guarantees, and ease of global verification and transfer, is presented as a potential next-generation neutral reserve asset. Forbes states that while the US dollar will continue to be used in international trade, Bitcoin could eventually assume the reserve asset role, reducing the global economy's dependence on any single country's debt instruments. The article also acknowledges that hurdles like price volatility and limited institutional adoption must be overcome. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru4m ago

American economic magazine Forbes stated that bitcoin could become a neutral reserve asset for the global economy!

cryptonews.ru4m ago

Cryptanalyst Spots Pattern Capable of Leading to Bitcoin Rise of 1000%

Crypto analyst Crypto Patel predicts that Bitcoin could surge by 1000% following the current market downturn, identifying a pattern he calls the "Bitcoin cycle scheme." He analyzed past cycles: the first saw a peak at $19,666, an 84% drop, then a rise to $69,000; the second involved a 77% drop before a climb to a record $126,000. The current cycle, with a peak at $126,000 and a subsequent 69% decline, fits the pattern of smaller corrections and higher peaks each time. Patel believes Bitcoin is nearing a zone that will become a bullish order block, triggering massive growth. He asserts the principle of repeatability "has never failed." However, experts like Scott Melker and Arthur Hayes argue Bitcoin's four-year cycle is no longer relevant. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading near $72,000, up 11.4% over 24 hours and nearly 12.1% over the week.

cryptonews.ru4m ago

Cryptanalyst Spots Pattern Capable of Leading to Bitcoin Rise of 1000%

cryptonews.ru4m ago

Surge over 269%, Did Yuan Yonggang Win Again by Betting on 'Optical Manufacturing Mother Machines'?

The stock price of Landun Optoelectronics (300862.SZ) has surged over 269%, driven by its announcement to acquire Lanchuang Technology, a manufacturer of high-end vacuum coating equipment used in producing key components (like TFF filters) for optical modules. This reflects a market shift towards investing in the upstream "industrial mother machines" of the booming AI and data center-driven optical module sector. Currently, the global market for such high-precision equipment, essential for manufacturing narrowband TFF filters in 800G/1.6T modules, is dominated by foreign companies like Germany's Bühler-Leybold and the US's Veeco, making domestic suppliers like Lanchuang scarce. The acquisition is part of the strategic expansion by the controlling shareholder, Yuan Yonggang, who is building a photonics portfolio across listed companies. This includes Dongshan Precision (a major optical module maker via its acquisition of Source Photonics) and Anfu Technology. While these moves have fueled significant market value growth, they also bring associated risks such as high debt from expansion, potential regulatory hurdles for the acquisition, and substantial goodwill. The market's enthusiasm underscores the focus on the critical, yet previously overlooked, equipment layer in the optical communication supply chain.

marsbit9m ago

Surge over 269%, Did Yuan Yonggang Win Again by Betting on 'Optical Manufacturing Mother Machines'?

marsbit9m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions