Un nouveau motif arc-en-ciel métrique dans le Bitcoin pourrait signaler un prix !

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-15Last updated on 2026-08-15

Abstract

Le Bitcoin a atteint son niveau d'évaluation le plus bas selon le modèle Rainbow Chart, basé sur les tendances de prix à long terme. Son score Z ajusté à la volatilité est également tombé à son plus bas niveau depuis dix ans. L'analyste Axel Adler Jr. de CryptoQuant indique que le Bitcoin se négocie dans une fourchette qualifiée de "prix de vente panique" sur le graphique en arc-en-ciel. Le prix actuel reflète un niveau de décote extrêmement important par rapport à la trajectoire de prix à long terme du modèle. Le graphique Rainbow mesure non seulement la baisse du prix, mais compare aussi le cours actuel à la tendance historique à long terme, révélant l'ampleur de l'écart du marché par rapport à cette tendance. Le score Z ajusté à la volatilité est descendu à -2,293, son niveau le plus bas depuis 2016. Lors du ralentissement du marché en 2022, il était de -1,979. Selon l'analyste, cet indicateur, qui tient compte des fluctuations de volatilité entre les cycles de marché, suggère que la divergence baissière actuelle du Bitcoin a dépassé le niveau observé au plus bas du précédent marché baissier. Cependant, cette évaluation extrêmement basse ne confirme pas à elle seule que le creux final est atteint. Bien que la fourchette de prix actuelle semble potentiellement attractive dans le cadre du modèle, des données provenant d'autres indicateurs sont nécessaires pour confirmer un changement de direction du marché.

Le Bitcoin est tombé à son plus bas niveau d'évaluation selon le modèle Rainbow Chart, qui est basé sur les tendances de prix à long terme. Son score Z ajusté à la volatilité a également chuté à son plus bas niveau depuis 10 ans.

L'analyste de CryptoQuant Axel Adler Jr. a déclaré que le Bitcoin se négocie dans une fourchette qui peut être décrite comme un "prix de vente panique" sur le graphique "Arc-en-ciel". Selon l'analyste, le prix actuel indique un niveau d'escompte extrêmement bas par rapport à la trajectoire de prix à long terme au sein de ce motif.

Le diagramme arc-en-ciel ne mesure pas seulement la chute du prix du Bitcoin. Le modèle compare le prix actuel à la tendance historique à long terme, montrant à quel point le marché s'est écarté de cette tendance.

Selon les données, le score Z ajusté à la volatilité a chuté à -2,293. Il s'agit du niveau le plus bas enregistré pour cet indicateur depuis 2016. Lors du ralentissement du marché en 2022, l'indicateur était à -1,979.

Selon l'analyste, cet indicateur, qui prend en compte les fluctuations de volatilité dans différents cycles de marché, indique que la divergence baissière actuelle du Bitcoin a dépassé le niveau observé au creux du précédent marché baissier.

Cependant, une évaluation extrêmement basse ne confirme pas de manière définitive qu'un creux final a été atteint. Bien que les perspectives actuelles indiquent une fourchette de prix potentiellement attractive dans le cadre du modèle, des données provenant d'autres indicateurs sont nécessaires pour confirmer que le marché a changé de direction.

*Ceci n'est pas une recommandation d'investissement.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QQu'est-ce que le modèle Rainbow Chart (graphique en arc-en-ciel) et que mesure-t-il pour le Bitcoin ?

ALe modèle Rainbow Chart (graphique en arc-en-ciel) est un modèle basé sur les tendances de prix à long terme du Bitcoin. Il compare le prix actuel à la trajectoire historique à long terme, montrant à quel point le marché s'est écarté de cette tendance.

QQue révèle le Z-score ajusté à la volatilité du Bitcoin selon l'analyste Axel Adler Jr. de CryptoQuant ?

ALe Z-score ajusté à la volatilité a chuté à -2,293, son niveau le plus bas depuis 2016. Cela indique que la divergence baissière actuelle du Bitcoin dépasse le niveau observé au creux du précédent marché baissier de 2022.

QSelon l'article, quel est l'état actuel du Bitcoin par rapport au modèle 'Rainbow Chart' ?

ALe Bitcoin est tombé à son niveau d'évaluation le plus bas selon le modèle Rainbow Chart. Il se négocie dans une fourchette que l'analyste décrit comme le 'prix de vente de panique' sur ce graphique.

QQue signifie l'expression 'prix de vente de panique' utilisée pour décrire la position du Bitcoin sur le graphique en arc-en-ciel ?

AL'expression 'prix de vente de panique' signifie que le prix actuel indique un niveau de décote extrêmement faible par rapport à la trajectoire de prix à long terme du modèle Rainbow, reflétant une forte pression de vente sur le marché.

QL'évaluation extrêmement basse du Bitcoin selon le modèle garantit-elle que le prix a atteint son point le plus bas ?

ANon, une évaluation extrêmement basse ne confirme pas de manière définitive qu'un creux final a été atteint. Bien que cela indique une zone de prix potentiellement attractive, la confirmation d'un changement de direction du marché nécessite des données d'autres indicateurs.

Related Reads

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit21m ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit21m ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit1h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit1h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit3h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit3h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片