The BIP-110 Chain Faces a Long Struggle for Survival

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-15Last updated on 2026-08-15

Abstract

The BIP-110 minority chain, a fork from the main Bitcoin network, has successfully mined a small chain of four blocks. Typically, this would immediately doom a fork, but BIP-110 proponents have an alternative survival strategy: to abandon the overwhelming SHA-256 difficulty by replacing the chain's Proof-of-Work (PoW) hash function entirely. Rumors suggest a transition to a new PoW algorithm, likely Blake2b, could occur in September. Currently, mining has stalled at block 961635, leaving over 400,000 transactions pending. The new BIP-110 coin has no exchange listings, resulting in no established market price or liquidity. Holders face risks from a lack of replay protection, which can cause unintentional coin movement between chains. The community is watching to see if the fork will successfully implement the PoW change to Blake2b, reset the mining difficulty, and add proper replay protection, facing a significant uphill battle for survival with minimal industry infrastructure support.

The BIP-110 faction has split from the main Bitcoin network and managed to mine a tiny chain of four blocks. Typically, this would immediately kill a fork, but supporters of BIP-110 have a different path to survival: to rid the minority chain of the unbearable SHA-256 difficulty by completely replacing the proof-of-work cryptographic hash function. Rumors suggest the switch to a new PoW algorithm could happen in September.

The four blocks mined by the Roughnecks.

To date, the Roughnecks have extended the minority chain to block 961635, but after this block was mined three days ago on August 12th, progress has stalled once again. Since then, block 961636 has accumulated a staggering amount of fees, but with virtually no exchange support, no one can reliably assess the value of the asset created by the BIP-110 fork or determine what these fees are worth.

The Plan: Blake2b

Supporters of BIP-110, including Ocean co-founder Luke Dash Jr., claim the minority chain will switch its PoW hash function from SHA-256 to Blake2b. According to available information, this choice was made from several randomly selected hash functions and PoW algorithms. Importantly, changing the minority chain's PoW hash function does not mean inventing or implementing a completely new consensus mechanism.

The original Blake algorithm was developed in 2008, and Blake2 emerged on December 21, 2012, thanks to Christian Winnerlein, Jean-Philippe Aumasson, Samuel Neves, and Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn. Blake2b is an optimized 64-bit variant of this primitive, designed for higher performance on modern processors. Blake2b was developed with the goal of outperforming SHA-256 on modern 64-bit CPUs while maintaining an equivalent or higher level of cryptographic security.

Knots/BIP-110 developers have developed a roadmap for changing the PoW algorithm on the minority chain. Image source: X.

As a Nakamoto consensus-based mining primitive, Blake2b has seen relatively limited adoption: it is used in Siacoin and only a few other PoW blockchains. For Blake2b to work, BIP-110 developers must rewrite the header validation mechanism and implement new PoW validation in the minority chain. Mining software, Stratum servers, and pool infrastructure must support the updated header format and hash function.

Explorers, wallets, and indexing tools also need updates to recognize the altered chain and its tokens. Miners, in turn, will require hardware or software capable of efficiently processing Blake2b. This is a large-scale undertaking, but its supporters seem determined to see it through.

No Exchange Trading Means No Price for the New Coin

The coin resulting from the BIP-110 fork has yet to appear on any exchange. There is no demand, no supply, no liquid market capable of determining a reliable price. Coins mined by the Roughnecks, under current rules, cannot be spent until they receive 100 confirmations. For now, transfers are mainly limited to holders who know how to safely split their coins, and users unknowingly sending BIP-110 coins due to the fork's lack of replay protection.

A visual illustration of a replay attack in a blockchain network. Replay attacks occur when a transaction valid in one branch can be copied and broadcast on another chain. Without replay protection, spending bitcoins on one chain can unintentionally move forked coins on the other chain.

As of this weekend, over 400,000 transactions have accumulated, waiting for a block and confirmations in the minority chain. Since the fork froze after just four blocks, this backlog will not be cleared anytime soon. With practically no economic incentives, supporters of the minority chain are already facing a brutal and difficult struggle. This fork has perhaps received the weakest support from industry infrastructure since the 2017 fork frenzy, when dozens of split coins still managed to gain recognition from major wallets and exchanges.

Here, this hasn't happened at all, and the crypto community is forced to watch events unfold. The real test will come if BIP-110 supporters actually abandon SHA-256 for Blake2b, reset the excessive mining difficulty, and finally add proper replay protection.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the BIP-110 minority chain's primary strategy for survival, and what specific change does it plan to implement?

AThe primary survival strategy for the BIP-110 minority chain is to replace its Proof-of-Work (PoW) hash function. It plans to switch from SHA-256 to Blake2b, which is a change in its consensus algorithm's cryptographic primitive.

QWho is a notable figure associated with the BIP-110 movement, and what potential timeline has been suggested for the PoW change?

AA notable figure is Luke Dash Jr, co-founder of Ocean. Rumors suggest the transition to the new PoW algorithm could happen in September.

QWhat is one major technical challenge mentioned for the chain's successful transition to Blake2b, beyond just the core software change?

AOne major technical challenge is the need for updates across the entire ecosystem. This includes mining software, Stratum servers, pool infrastructure, explorers, wallets, and indexing tools to recognize the changed chain and its tokens.

QWhat major problem is highlighted regarding the economic viability and valuation of the BIP-110 forked coin?

AThe major problem is the lack of exchange listing. Without trading on exchanges, there is no market to establish a price, no supply and demand, and no liquidity for the new coin, making its value impossible to assess reliably.

QWhat specific security vulnerability currently exists in the BIP-110 fork, and what risk does it pose to users?

AThe fork currently lacks replay protection. This vulnerability means that a transaction valid on the main Bitcoin chain can be copied and broadcast on the BIP-110 chain, potentially causing users to unintentionally move their forked coins when they spend their main chain bitcoins.

Related Reads

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit40m ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit40m ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit2h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit2h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Robert Kiyosaki Shares His Mentor's Predictions About the Emergence of Bitcoin and AI

American entrepreneur and author of "Rich Dad Poor Dad," Robert Kiyosaki, discussed the influence of futurist R. Buckminster Fuller on his worldview, linking Fuller's past technological predictions to the emergence of Bitcoin and the development of artificial intelligence. In an X post, Kiyosaki also reflected on personal purpose, sharing his journey from the music business—where he worked with bands like The Police and Iron Maiden—to creating the "Cashflow" board game and writing his famous book. He described feeling an inner emptiness despite his success, a turning point that came after meeting Fuller, whom he studied with for three summers. Kiyosaki described Fuller as a "friendly genius" who foresaw world-changing developments like Bitcoin and AI. However, the core of his post focused on Fuller's philosophical impact, particularly a quote about belonging to the universe and finding purpose by dedicating one's life to the maximum benefit of others. The entrepreneur remains a vocal advocate for cryptocurrencies. He regularly advises buying Bitcoin during market panics, viewing it and assets like Ethereum, gold, and silver as hedges against traditional financial system failures. Kiyosaki has predicted a major market crash by 2026, seeing it as an opportunity for prepared investors, with long-term price targets including $750,000 for Bitcoin and $95,000 for Ethereum.

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Robert Kiyosaki Shares His Mentor's Predictions About the Emergence of Bitcoin and AI

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片