Bitcoin Price Drops to $62,470 as Sellers Retest $63,000 Support Level

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

Bitcoin's price fell below $63,000 for a second consecutive day on Friday, hitting an intraday low of $62,470. The cryptocurrency later recovered to trade just above $63,000, leaving it nearly flat for the past 24 hours and for August overall, with a weekly loss of 2.6%. The volatility triggered significant liquidations, with $26 million of leveraged long Bitcoin positions liquidated over 24 hours. Market sentiment was further dampened by data showing over $131 million in outflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs for a second straight day, signaling a potential pullback by institutional investors. Adding to the negative pressure, index provider MSCI has proposed new criteria for "non-operating companies" in its global indexes, which could lead to the exclusion of firms holding significant digital assets like Bitcoin on their balance sheets. Companies such as Strategy and Metaplanet could be affected, potentially forcing index-tracking funds to sell their shares. Strategy publicly criticized the proposal, arguing digital assets are legitimate assets and index providers should not dictate what companies can own. Public consultations on MSCI's proposal end September 30, with a final decision expected by October 16. If approved, exclusions could begin in November, potentially triggering sustained institutional selling and damaging a key bridge for Bitcoin adoption in the corporate sector.

On Friday, Bitcoin fell below the $63,000 mark for the second consecutive day, with the decline accelerating at the start of the trading session.

Initially, it seemed the cryptocurrency was consolidating around $63,400 several hours after dropping to $62,912 on Thursday. However, a sell-off that began shortly after midnight pulled the price down to $62,670, after which it recovered and traded just below $62,800.

Soon after 8:00 AM Eastern Standard Time (EST), Bitcoin began to decline again, reaching a daily low of $62,470. A subsequent recovery rally helped it reclaim the $63,000 level. As of 1:20 PM EST, the cryptocurrency was trading just above $63,000, virtually unchanged over the previous 24 hours.

The stable price dynamics kept Bitcoin's market capitalization below $1.27 trillion, with weekly losses amounting to 2.6%. After a strong start to the month, Bitcoin is now nearly flat in price as August reaches its midpoint.

In the derivatives market, volatility triggered significant liquidations of over-leveraged long positions. According to Coinglass, out of the $32 million in leveraged Bitcoin positions liquidated over 24 hours, long positions accounted for $26 million—approximately $8 million less than on Thursday. Across the broader crypto market, long position liquidations totaled $94 million, while short position liquidations amounted to $72.5 million.

Bitcoin's lackluster performance was further impacted by spot Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) data indicating an outflow of over $131 million. Thursday marked the second consecutive day—and the third this week—that ETFs experienced net redemptions. The sustained outflow suggests institutional investors may be retreating, contradicting signs of renewed interest observed last week.

An additional factor worsening market sentiment was news that index provider MSCI proposed new selection criteria for 'non-operational companies' within its global investable market indexes. Although this system is not directly targeting cryptocurrencies, it assesses whether a company's primary operational assets constitute more than 50% of its total assets.

Strategy's Response to MSCI's Proposal

Market observers note that companies actively utilizing digital assets as treasury reserves, including Strategy and Metaplanet, do not meet the proposed criteria and could be excluded from the indexes in upcoming rebalancings. While previous inclusion in major stock indexes allowed passive index funds and ETFs to automatically acquire shares of these companies, their exclusion could trigger forced selling by institutional investors.

In response, Strategy published a statement on X, strongly opposing the proposal:

"Digital assets are assets. Index providers should measure markets, not dictate what assets companies are allowed to own. MSCI's proposal puts the company at odds with the stance of regulators, markets, and its own clients. Bitcoin doesn't need MSCI. Neither does Strategy," the company stated.

MSCI's public consultation will last until September 30, with a final decision planned for October 16. If approved, the index exclusions will begin as early as November—a timeline that could trigger prolonged institutional selling and undermine an important bridge for Bitcoin adoption in the corporate sector, effectively dimming Bitcoin's year-end growth prospects.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what was Bitcoin's intraday low price on Friday and what key support level were sellers testing?

ABitcoin's intraday low on Friday was $62,470, and sellers were testing the key support level of $63,000.

QWhat is indicated by the consecutive days of net outflows from Bitcoin Spot ETFs, as mentioned in the article?

AThe consecutive days of net outflows from Bitcoin Spot ETFs indicate that institutional investors may be pulling back, which contradicts signs of renewed interest observed the previous week.

QWhat impact did the recent market volatility have on leveraged Bitcoin positions in the derivatives market?

AThe recent market volatility triggered significant liquidations of over-leveraged long positions. For Bitcoin specifically, $26 million out of $32 million in liquidated leveraged positions were long positions.

QWhat is the potential consequence for companies like Strategy, as per the article, based on MSCI's proposed new criteria for 'non-operating companies'?

ABased on MSCI's proposed new criteria, companies like Strategy that hold a significant portion of their assets in digital assets (like Bitcoin) as treasury reserves could be excluded from MSCI's global investable market indexes.

QHow did the company Strategy respond to MSCI's proposal, and what is the timeline for a final decision?

AStrategy responded by opposing the proposal on X, stating that digital assets are assets and index providers should measure markets, not decide which assets companies are allowed to hold. MSCI's public consultation lasts until September 30, with a final decision planned for October 16, and exclusions could begin as early as November.

Related Reads

Elon Musk Building Terafab: The Largest Chip Factory for AI, Robots, and Space Data Centers

Elon Musk's SpaceX and Tesla have launched the Terafab project to build a massive semiconductor facility in Grimes County, Texas. The plant, exceeding 9.3 million square meters, aims to integrate logic chip manufacturing, memory production, advanced packaging, and testing. The initial phase requires $16.8 billion in capital investment, with a long-term goal of producing over 1 terawatt of computing power annually. This capacity will support Tesla's Optimus robots and Cybercab autonomous vehicles, as well as SpaceX's orbital data centers. Texas Governor Greg Abbott confirmed the project's start in August 2026, highlighting 3,000 new jobs and a $30 million state grant. Elon Musk emphasized the strategic advantage of combining logic, memory, and packaging under one roof. Musk called the future complex the "largest and most valuable building on Earth," with an area roughly 50 times that of the Pentagon. Intel is the key technology partner, with plans to use its 14A process node for chip production. This partnership aims to diversify supply chains currently dominated by TSMC. The project aligns with the U.S. Pax Silica initiative to secure semiconductor supply chains. An AI analysis notes the project's scale and potential challenges, comparing it to delays seen in other U.S. megafab projects like Intel's Ohio facility. It questions whether Terafab can avoid similar pitfalls related to timelines, budgets, workforce, and supply chain stability. The facility's success could significantly shift the global semiconductor balance and strengthen the U.S. position in the tech race.

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Elon Musk Building Terafab: The Largest Chip Factory for AI, Robots, and Space Data Centers

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Elon Musk is Building Terafab: The Largest Chip Plant for AI, Robots, and Space Data Centers

Elon Musk's SpaceX and Tesla have launched the massive Terafab project to build a semiconductor plant in Grimes County, Texas. Spanning over 9.3 million square meters, the facility will integrate logic chip and memory production, advanced packaging, and testing. The initial phase requires $16.8 billion in capital investment, with a long-term goal of producing over 1 terawatt of computing power annually. This output is intended to supply Tesla's Optimus robots and Cybercab autonomous vehicles, as well as SpaceX's orbital data centers. Texas Governor Greg Abbott confirmed the project's start on August 6, 2026, highlighting the creation of 3,000 jobs and a $30 million grant from the Texas Enterprise Fund. Musk emphasized the strategic advantage of combining chip design, memory production, and packaging under one roof to accelerate hardware development. He stated the fully built complex would be "the largest and most valuable building on Earth," about 50 times larger than the Pentagon. An estimated 25% of production is earmarked for Tesla's robotics, with 75% for SpaceX's space-based AI systems. Earlier tax documents suggested a total project cost of up to $119 billion, but this has not been officially confirmed. Intel is the key technology partner, with plans to use its 14A process node for chip manufacturing. This partnership aims to diversify supply chains and reduce dependence on dominant foundries like TSMC. The initiative aligns with the broader U.S. Pax Silica program, which seeks to build secure international semiconductor supply chains with allied nations. An AI-driven analysis notes that megafab projects, such as Intel's delayed Ohio facility, often face schedule and budget overruns. While Terafab represents a significant step toward U.S. semiconductor self-sufficiency and could shift the global tech balance, its success will depend on factors like skilled labor availability, energy supply, and supply chain stability. The final outcome may not be clear until the late 2030s.

cryptonews.ru27m ago

Elon Musk is Building Terafab: The Largest Chip Plant for AI, Robots, and Space Data Centers

cryptonews.ru27m ago

"AI God of Stocks" Blowup Dragged Down, Jane Street Suffered Massive 15 Billion Loss in July, First Monthly Loss in a Decade

Jane Street, a major proprietary trading firm, suffered an estimated $15 billion loss in July, marking its first monthly loss in about a decade. The loss was primarily triggered by the blow-up of the AI-focused hedge fund Situational Awareness, which faced massive margin calls amid a sharp sell-off in AI and semiconductor stocks in July. Jane Street, an investor in the fund, was significantly impacted. Compounding the loss were substantial declines in Jane Street's own Asian non-AI equity long positions, which had performed well earlier in the year. The firm described the losses as a concentrated reversal of previously successful trading strategies in AI and tech sectors. Despite the historic monthly loss, Jane Street's net trading income for the year to date remains strong at over $40 billion. In response, the firm stated it has become more selective in risk-taking, closing specific losing exposures and reducing risk in other strategies. Coinciding with the loss, Jane Street is undergoing a major debt refinancing of approximately $14.6 billion, led by JPMorgan. The move aims to shift more debt from public markets to private investors like Pimco and Fidelity, accepting higher costs for greater flexibility and less public disclosure. The Situational Awareness incident highlights systemic risks in the prime brokerage ecosystem, where leveraged bets on crowded AI trades can lead to forced liquidations and market volatility. Jane Street's subsequent risk reduction and debt restructuring are seen as key responses to this costly lesson.

marsbit32m ago

"AI God of Stocks" Blowup Dragged Down, Jane Street Suffered Massive 15 Billion Loss in July, First Monthly Loss in a Decade

marsbit32m ago

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

QCP Capital's latest report explains that Bitcoin has stalled around $63,000, testing the lower boundary of its recent trading range ($62,500–$64,000). The retreat wasn't due to a single catalyst but stems from several cross-market pressures: heightened geopolitical risks, rising oil prices, uncertainty around global liquidity, and a muted reaction to positive U.S. macroeconomic data. While U.S. inflation and jobs data softened, reducing expectations of imminent Fed tightening, Bitcoin's price response has been subdued. This highlights the importance of other factors like trader positioning, liquidity conditions, and overall risk appetite. The regulatory landscape is progressing on two tracks: congressional legislation (like the CLARITY Act) is delayed, but SEC rulemaking continues. Corporate treasury activity, exemplified by Strategy's new Bitcoin monetization program, now creates a potential two-way flow, adding complexity to supply dynamics. Geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz keep oil prices elevated, impacting crypto indirectly through inflation expectations and financial conditions. Historical seasonality shows August and September are typically weak for Bitcoin, but this is descriptive, not predictive, in today's ETF-driven market. In conclusion, Bitcoin has shown resilience by absorbing multiple negative forces without a decisive breakdown. However, it has failed to convert improving macro fundamentals into sustained upward momentum. The market awaits key events like the U.S. PCE data, the Jackson Hole symposium, and the September FOMC meeting for a potential catalyst to break the current range.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片