以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-31Last updated on 2026-07-31

Abstract

以太坊网络上因希望进行质押的验证者数量激增,形成了约250万枚ETH的激活队列,新参与者需等待约43天才能激活其代币。然而,Sygnum Bank的托管与质押部门负责人托马斯·布伦纳指出,这种漫长的等待不应被直接解读为强烈的看涨信号。 布伦纳表示,验证者队列的拥堵虽然反映了机构需求,但也受到以太坊协议技术特性的显著影响。他提到,自Dencun升级后,每日验证者吞吐量被限制在约57,600枚ETH,且这一限制在Pectra升级中并未提高。Pectra升级允许单个验证者最多持有2048枚ETH并支持自动复利功能,大型质押运营商可以向现有验证者追加ETH而非创建新验证者。但即便仅向现有验证者添加1枚ETH,该交易也会与新的质押者一同进入相同的激活队列。 因此,布伦纳认为,并非队列中的所有ETH都源自新投资者的需求,其中部分积累来自于已质押ETH的再分配、对现有验证者的补充以及复利过程。他指出,一个更重要的市场信号是提款队列几乎为空,这表明现有参与者正在维持其网络头寸,显示出真实的信心。 目前,以太坊网络上已质押约4120万枚ETH,约占流通总量的33.8%。布伦纳还强调,尽管ETH价格有所疲软,机构投资者并未放弃质押。许多机构将质押收益视为以太坊内在的基本特性,但机构参与的最大障碍之一仍是隐私问题。由于验证者地址、存款地址和提款交易在区块链上可被追踪,机构投资者对扩大其质押规模持谨慎态度,隐私问题仍是制约以太坊机构质押市场更快增长的主要障碍。

希望在以太坊网络中质押其代币的验证者数量激增,导致激活队列中积压了约250万枚$ETH。由于当前网络拥塞,新的质押参与者需要等待大约43天才能激活其代币。然而,Sygnum Bank的托管与质押部门负责人托马斯·布伦纳指出,如此长的等待时间不应被直接解读为强烈看涨趋势的直接标志。

布伦纳表示,尽管验证者队列的拥塞反映了机构需求,但其也在很大程度上受到以太坊协议技术特性的影响。他指出,在Dencun升级之后,验证者的每日吞吐量被限制在大约57,600枚$ETH,并且这个限制在Pectra升级中并未提高。

Pectra升级允许单个验证者最多存储2,048枚$ETH,并具备自动复利功能。大型质押运营商可以向现有验证者添加$ETH,而无需创建新的验证者。然而,即使只是向现有验证者添加1枚$ETH,该笔交易也会被纳入与新的质押参与者相同的激活队列。

因此,布伦纳指出,并非队列中所有的$ETH都是由于新投资者的需求。部分积压是由于重新分配已质押的$ETH、对现有验证者的追加以及复利过程造成的。

布伦纳表示,关于以太坊市场一个更强烈的信号是几乎为空的提款队列。投资者没有排队提取他们已质押的$ETH,这表明现有参与者继续持有他们在网络中的头寸。

布伦纳说:“几乎没有人退出他们的质押头寸。这反映了真正的信心。进入队列既反映了需求,也反映了基础设施机制。”

根据当前数据,以太坊网络中大约质押了4,120万枚$ETH。这大约占流通中以太坊总量的33.8%。

布伦纳还指出,尽管$ETH价格疲软,但机构投资者并未放弃质押。他表示,许多机构将质押收益视为以太坊天然且根本的特性,但机构投资者参与的最大障碍之一是隐私问题。

以太坊质押中使用的验证者地址、存款地址和提款交易都可在区块链上追踪,这使得机构投资者在扩大其质押操作规模时持谨慎态度。布伦纳表示,未解决的隐私问题仍然是阻碍以太坊机构质押市场更快增长的主要障碍之一。

*本文不构成投资建议。

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q什么导致以太坊质押形成了43天的等待队列?

A由于希望质押ETH的验证者数量激增,导致激活队列中积压了约250万个ETH。同时,Dencun升级后,协议将每日激活的验证者吞吐量限制在了约57,600个ETH,且后续的Pectra升级未提高此限制,从而造成了长时间的等待。

Q专家托马斯·布伦纳认为,长时间等待质押是强烈的牛市信号吗?为什么?

A不完全是。布伦纳认为,排队时间长虽然反映了机构需求,但同样受到了以太坊协议技术特点的重大影响,例如激活吞吐量上限。此外,队列中的ETH不全来自新投资者,也包含了现有验证者的增持和利息复合过程。

Q根据专家的观点,什么才是衡量以太坊市场信心的更强信号?

A布伦纳指出,提现队列几乎为空是衡量市场信心的更强信号。这意味着现有质押者并未排队赎回他们的ETH,表明他们愿意继续持守仓位,这反映了真实的信任。

Q当前以太坊网络上质押的ETH总量和占比是多少?

A根据文章数据,当前以太坊网络上质押了约4120万个ETH,这大约占流通中ETH总量的33.8%。

Q机构投资者扩大以太坊质押业务面临的主要障碍是什么?

A主要的障碍是隐私问题。因为验证者地址、存款地址和提款交易在区块链上都是公开可追溯的,这使得机构投资者对于大规模开展质押业务持谨慎态度,担心其操作规模和动向被暴露。

Related Reads

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit49m ago

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit49m ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片