一周代币解锁:XPL解锁价值千万美元代币

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-21Last updated on 2026-06-21

Abstract

本周,两个项目将进行大规模代币解锁,总价值超过千万美元。 **SoSoValue** 将解锁1303万枚代币,价值约387万美元。该项目是一个人工智能驱动的投资研究平台,旨在结合CeFi效率与DeFi透明度,解决加密市场信息过载和跨链资产管理问题。 **Plasma** 将解锁1.1亿枚代币,价值约1042万美元。该项目是专为全球稳定币支付构建的Layer 1区块链,具有高吞吐量、稳定币原生功能和EVM兼容性,支持定制Gas代币、零费用USDT转账和隐私支付。 两个项目均公布了其代币的具体释放曲线。

SoSoValue

项目推特:https://x.com/SoSoValueCrypto

项目官网:https://sosovalue.com/

本次解锁数量:1303万枚

本次解锁金额:约387万美元

SoSoValue 是一个人工智能驱动的投资研究平台,它将 CeFi 的高效性与 DeFi 的透明性相结合,致力于解决加密货币市场中信息过载和跨链资产管理等挑战。

具体释放曲线如下:

Plasma

项目推特:https://x.com/Plasma

项目官网:https://www.plasma.to/

本次解锁数量:1.1亿枚

本次解锁金额:约1042万美元

Plasma 是专为全球稳定币支付打造的 Layer 1 区块链。它融合了高吞吐量、稳定币原生功能以及完整的 EVM 兼容性,为开发者构建下一代支付和金融应用提供了基础架构。它还支持可定制的 Gas 代币、零费用 USDT 转账、隐私支付。

具体释放曲线如下:

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q根据文章,哪两个项目将进行代币解锁?

A根据文章,将进行代币解锁的两个项目是SoSoValue和Plasma。

QSoSoValue本次解锁的代币数量和金额分别是多少?

ASoSoValue本次解锁的代币数量是1303万枚,金额约为387万美元。

QPlasma项目本次解锁的代币金额约多少美元?

APlasma项目本次解锁的代币金额约为1042万美元。

QSoSoValue是一个什么样的平台?

ASoSoValue是一个人工智能驱动的投资研究平台,它将CeFi的高效性与DeFi的透明性相结合,致力于解决加密货币市场中的信息过载和跨链资产管理等挑战。

QPlasma是一个什么样的区块链项目?其主要特点或目标是什么?

APlasma是专为全球稳定币支付打造的Layer 1区块链。其主要特点或目标是融合高吞吐量、稳定币原生功能以及完整的EVM兼容性,为开发者构建下一代支付和金融应用提供基础架构,还支持可定制的Gas代币、零费用USDT转账和隐私支付。

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is PLASMA

Plasma: A Cutting-Edge Solution for Blockchain Scalability Introduction to Plasma As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, there is an increasing need for enhanced efficiency within blockchain networks. Plasma, a Layer 2 scaling solution, emerges as a pioneering player in this area, particularly in the sphere of Web3 development. By strategically shifting a significant portion of tasks from the main chain to a series of smaller chains, Plasma aims to significantly enhance the scalability and performance of Ethereum—a widely-used blockchain platform that is at the forefront of decentralised applications. What is Plasma? Plasma is an innovative off-chain scaling solution specifically designed for the Ethereum blockchain. It was introduced in August 2017 by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Joseph Poon, a prominent advocate of scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Plasma serves as a framework that enables the creation of scalable applications by establishing a hierarchical structure of child chains that sit above the main Ethereum chain. At its core, Plasma facilitates the development of potentially unlimited side chains that can operate independently while still relying on the Ethereum network for security and consensus. This architecture is supported by smart contracts and Merkle Trees, which efficiently manage transactions and data storage. Core Objectives of Plasma The primary goal of Plasma is to increase the throughput of the Ethereum network. By diverting a significant volume of transactions away from the congested main chain, Plasma's architecture offers higher transaction speeds, more efficient data processing, and lower transaction costs. This is particularly crucial in an age where the demand for decentralised applications—especially in finance, gaming, and supply chain management—is reaching unprecedented levels. Creator of Plasma Plasma is the brainchild of two renowned figures in the blockchain community: Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon. Buterin is celebrated primarily for co-founding Ethereum and pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve. Poon, on the other hand, is known for advocating scalable solutions that enable faster and more cost-effective transactions on blockchain networks. Their collaboration on the Plasma framework has significantly contributed to its innovative nature, merging advanced technical insights with practical applications. Investors of Plasma While the specific investment foundations or organisations supporting Plasma remain undisclosed, the project has attracted interest from various prominent figures and players in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. With its potential for enhancing scalability within Ethereum, it has captured the attention of various entities aiming to push the boundaries of blockchain technology. How Does Plasma Work? Plasma's unique functionality stems from its architectural framework that relies on child chains and their interaction with the main Ethereum network. Below are some key factors that contribute to Plasma's innovative approach: Child Chains: Plasma establishes numerous child chains that can execute transactions independently of the main Ethereum chain. Each child chain operates as a separate smart contract with unique features, allowing developers to create tailored solutions based on their specific requirements. Smart Contracts and Merkle Trees: The framework utilises smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements with predefined conditions, combined with Merkle Trees that enable efficient verification of data. This technology allows Plasma to achieve both high scalability and security. Transaction Compression: By batching transactions on the child chains, Plasma reduces the data load on the Ethereum network. This implies that fewer transactions need to be recorded on the main chain—thereby freeing up space and alleviating congestion. Enhanced Security: Despite being off-chain, Plasma leverages the security measures of the main Ethereum network, ensuring that all transactions on child chains maintain a high level of integrity and security. Timeline of Plasma Understanding the development of Plasma involves tracing its significant milestones: August 2017: Plasma was first introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon as a scalable solution to address Ethereum's performance challenges. 2018: The Plasma framework was officially developed and made available on GitHub, marking a crucial step towards its implementation in practical applications. 2019: As awareness about Plasma grew, it began to attract developers interested in scaling Ethereum applications, thus increasing its adoption. 2020: Plasma continued evolving, with substantial enhancements made to its architecture and functionality—making it even more appealing to developers. Key Features of Plasma Plasma boasts several characteristics that position it as a transformative solution in the blockchain space: Scalability: By creating multiple child chains, Plasma can handle a higher volume of transactions without placing further strain on the main Ethereum chain. Speed: Each child chain can process transactions more rapidly, providing users with a better experience and service. Lower Transaction Costs: Plasma's structure effectively reduces the costs associated with transactions by minimising the burden on the main chain. Interoperability: The architecture allows Plasma to seamlessly interact with multiple blockchains, enhancing cross-network functionality. Security: By harnessing the security of Ethereum’s main chain, Plasma ensures the integrity of its operations while using its child chains. Use Cases for Plasma The innovative architecture of Plasma opens the door for various practical applications across different sectors: Decentralised Finance (DeFi): Plasma has the capacity to enhance the scalability and efficiency of DeFi applications, creating smoother and more effective trading processes. Gaming: The framework facilitates the development of quick and cost-efficient gaming experiences, making it appealing to developers in the gaming industry. Supply Chain Management: With the ability to achieve efficient transaction processing, Plasma can promote the development of decentralised supply chain management solutions. Conclusion Plasma stands at the forefront of blockchain technology, positioned as a pivotal Layer 2 scaling solution aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Ethereum network and beyond. Through its unique structure of child chains, smart contracts, and Merkle Trees, Plasma presents a compelling solution to the scalability crisis that has long plagued blockchain networks. As blockchain technology continues to advance, solutions like Plasma promise to reshape how developers approach scalability challenges, potentially revolutionising how decentralised applications function. The ongoing efforts by its creators and the interest of various stakeholders indicate a bright future for Plasma as it seeks to elevate blockchain capabilities to new heights in the digital realm.

187 Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.03Updated 2024.12.03

What is PLASMA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XPL (XPL) are presented below.

活动图片