瑞·达利欧:中国主导的“朝贡体系”重现,AI产业将如电动汽车产业一样发展

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-08Last updated on 2026-06-08

Abstract

桥水基金创始人瑞·达利欧近期就世界格局与人工智能(AI)产业发展发表观点。他认为,随着美国全球信誉下降及中国影响力提升,世界正步入由中国主导的“朝贡体系”时期,即各国通过访华等方式承认其实力,形成基于相对实力的等级化国际关系。这一变化将加剧市场不确定性,促使投资者寻求资产多元化配置,包括黄金。 在AI领域,达利欧指出中美发展路径存在显著差异。美国公司侧重于调整商业模式以实现盈利和上市,而中国则将AI视为像水电一样的基础工具,致力于以可承受的成本让广大劳动者使用,推动生产力提升。他类比中国电动汽车产业的成功模式,认为中国AI产业将走类似道路,即通过大规模应用和市场渗透实现快速增长。摩根大通高管亦指出,中国更关注利用AI驱动产业升级,寻找如机器人技术等下一个主导领域,而非担忧AI对就业的冲击。

原文来自:《华尔街周报》节目:达利欧的警告&瑞·达利欧谈中美 AI 发展

编译 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina)

译者 | Wenser(@wenser2010)

编者按:作为世界上最大的对冲基金桥水基金的创始人,瑞·达利欧的言论历来受到了社会各界的高度关注,尤其是其对世界宏观经济局势以及不同产业的认知,更是无数人津津乐道的话题。随着上个月美国总统特朗普、俄罗斯总统普京等领导人接连访华,瑞·达利欧也针对此事提出了自己新的观点——“世界格局正在变化,由中国主导的朝贡体系正在建立”。近日,针对中美之间的“AI 巨头竞争态势”,其也给出了自己的针对性观点。以下内容由 Odaily 星球日报整理编译,部分细节有删改。

瑞·达利欧谈“中国主导下的世界”:朝贡体系再现

上个月,美国总统特朗普、俄罗斯总统普京相继访华后,瑞·达利欧接受了来自彭博社《华尔街周报》节目的 David Westin 的采访。

节目中,瑞·达利欧直言,“美国作为愿意为捍卫自身利益而战的全球强国的信誉正在下降,而中国则在不断积累属于自己的全球财富和世界影响力。这一局势正在从根本上改变世界其他国家对这两个国家的看法。”

“目前,美国在全球 80 多个国家拥有大约 750 个军事基地,因此长期以来一直被视为在面临(战争)攻击时值得信赖的盟友。”但在瑞·达利欧结束了为期一个月左右的亚洲之行后(其中包括在中国与多位领导人的近 10 天左右的会面),他感觉到了一种重要的变化:越来越多的国家逐渐认为——“无法指望美国来赢得战争”。

瑞·达里奥的言论进一步阐述了他长期以来的观点:“美国的实力正在逐渐减弱,与之相对,中国的实力则在不断增强。”得益于瑞·达利欧旗下的桥水基金与中国接触颇多,该观点受到了不少人的认可。但另一方面,由于其与中国领导人较为亲密的关系,他的这些观点也受到了不少批评。

达利欧随后表示,国际社会的认可对中国来说非常重要。目前,中国的经济规模约为美国的 60%到 70%,这一比例在过去的 20 年里增长了三倍多。他说,虽然中国并不寻求征服或占领其他国家,但它非常重视各国政治领导人的认可。“你可以看到,很多国家的领导人纷纷访华,这就好比中国历史上那种‘朝贡制度’——各国都来承认并尊重中国的强大实力,但这种体系并非压迫性的、控制性的体系。”(Odaily星球日报 注:原话为 ‘tribute system’)

“所以,这种朝贡制度其实是一种等级制度,在与其他国家打交道时,重要的是这种制度会如何影响双方之间的贸易和国家安全。我认为,从政治角度来看,我们现在正步入这样一个时期:(中国与)各个国家之间会形成类似朝贡制度的安排,而各国之间的相对实力则将成为(世界政治局势中的)决定性因素。”过程当中,瑞·达利欧也提及,知道 17 世纪中叶,西方社会才逐渐产生了国家、国界等概念,此前,西方社会中的权力格局由不同的王室家族构成,这和中国历史一直以来承袭的边疆概念是截然不同的。

他认为,这一变化会直接影响到(资本以及金融等全球)市场。因为投资者必须应对当前这一动荡局面:货币价值存在风险,(世界范围内的)不确定性则要求投资者保持流动性并实现资产多元化配置,包括投资黄金。

瑞·达利欧谈“中美两国 AI 竞争态势”:中国 AI 产业将如电动汽车产业一样发展

6 月,Business Insider 报道了瑞·达利欧对中美两国 AI 赛道竞争的观点,同样提及了两者之间的巨大差异和潜在影响。

瑞·达利欧表示,中国将人工智能视为一种应该为所有劳动者所拥有的重要工具。“这就像电和自来水一样,是每个人都应该享有的东西,”

作为早在 1984 年就曾首次访问中国的知名企业家,瑞·达里奥长期以来一直非常看好中国的发展。此前他曾在纽约举行的《福布斯》杂志会议上告诉与会者:“中国通过出口获得了巨额利润,而这些资金被广泛利用于人工智能领域的研发,从而通过提高生产效率来推动经济增长。”

值得一提的是,瑞·达利欧强调道,当 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 等美国公司正在调整( AI 模型的)订阅套餐结构、努力增加收入以准备上市时,中国的公司则致力于让尽可能多的普通员工能够使用他们的模型。“它不一定要价格昂贵,甚至也不一定(现在)非得盈利才行。”

“某种程度上,”达利欧认为,“它模仿了该国在电动汽车产业等领域的成功路径——中国的本土企业比亚迪等企业在欧洲等市场实现了快速增长。”

在达里奥演讲后的嘉宾讨论中,摩根大通高管 Mary Callahan Erdoes 指出,与美国“将就业问题视为政治话题”的社会氛围不同,中国 AI 企业的高管和政界人士在提及 AI 时,“并没有 AI 冲击就业的恐惧”。相反,该国更注重“利用 AI 来推动各项发展”,并致力于寻找下一个可以取得主导地位的产业领域。“机器人技术赛道基本上可以被视为中国的‘下一代电动汽车产业’,”她说道。

Related Questions

Q瑞·达利欧认为中国正在建立什么样的国际体系?他使用了什么历史概念来形容?

A瑞·达利欧认为中国正在主导建立一个以“朝贡体系”(tribute system)为参照的国际秩序。他强调,这种体系并非压迫或控制性的,而是一种等级制度,其核心在于各国领导人通过访华等方式,承认和尊重中国的强大实力,这种相对实力将成为世界政治局势的决定性因素。

Q瑞·达利欧如何看待中美两国在AI产业发展路径上的主要差异?

A瑞·达利欧认为,中美两国在AI产业发展路径上存在根本差异。美国公司(如OpenAI和Anthropic)更关注调整订阅套餐、增加收入和准备上市,带有商业盈利导向。而中国则将AI视为像水电一样的基础设施和普惠工具,致力于让尽可能多的普通劳动者使用,现阶段并不强求立即盈利,其发展路径类似于在电动汽车产业上的成功模式。

Q在AI发展的社会态度上,中美两国有何不同?摩根大通高管的评论是什么?

A在AI发展的社会态度上,美国社会更多地将AI带来的就业冲击视为一个政治话题,存在一定的恐惧。而根据摩根大通高管Mary Callahan Erdoes的评论,中国AI企业高管和政界人士在谈论AI时,“并没有AI冲击就业的恐惧”。他们更注重利用AI来推动各项发展,并致力于寻找下一个可以取得主导地位的产业领域,例如将机器人技术视为“下一代电动汽车产业”。

Q瑞·达利欧对全球投资者在当前局势下的资产配置提出了什么建议?

A瑞·达利欧认为,当前世界格局变化带来了动荡和不确定性。他建议全球投资者必须应对这种局面,意识到货币价值存在风险。为此,投资者应保持资产的流动性并进行多元化配置,其中包括投资黄金以对冲风险。

Q根据文章,瑞·达利欧通过什么现象来佐证其关于中国国际影响力上升的观点?

A瑞·达利欧主要通过近期多国领导人(如上月美国总统特朗普、俄罗斯总统普京)接连访华这一现象来佐证其观点。他认为这类似于中国历史上的“朝贡制度”,即各国领导人通过访问来承认和尊重中国的强大实力,这标志着由中国主导的国际影响力体系正在建立。

Related Reads

Google TPU Shipments Revised Up by 50%

Recent industry research indicates a significant upward revision in the shipments of Google's TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) chips. Previous expectations for 2027 were set at around 10 million units, but new estimates now point to 15 million units, a 50% increase. This substantial boost directly translates to higher demand across the entire supporting supply chain. Google's TPU clusters utilize a standardized all-optical interconnect architecture. Consequently, key hardware components are deeply integrated and scaled in fixed ratios with the chips. The 15 million TPU target will drive corresponding demand increases for NPO optical engines (roughly a 1:1 match), 1.6T optical modules, OCS optical switches, high-end server power supplies, fiber optics & MPO connectors, and liquid cooling solutions. Among these, liquid cooling is highlighted as the sector experiencing the most significant transformation and offering the most stable potential for excess returns. As next-generation TPU chips reach power levels where traditional air cooling is insufficient, liquid cooling becomes essential. 2026 is forecasted as the first year of substantial adoption for Google's liquid cooling solutions. This shift, coupled with delivery and capacity bottlenecks faced by incumbent overseas manufacturers, is creating a prime window for domestic Chinese suppliers to enter and secure Google's core supply chain. The market size for Google-specific liquid cooling is projected to potentially triple from a baseline of hundreds of billions to around 300 billion units by 2028. The logic for the fiber optic sector is also being rewritten. Once considered a cyclical commodity tied to telecom operator procurement, fiber is now a strategic and scarce resource for AI Data Centers (AIDC). A severe supply-demand imbalance, driven by the long lead time for preform production (18-24 months) and surging demand from cloud giants, is supporting strong performance. Chinese fiber manufacturers are well-positioned to capture a significant share of global AIDC demand, with exports potentially reaching 200-300 million core kilometers in 2026. Overall, the investment focus within the AI computing industry is shifting from pure "chip performance speculation" towards the more certain incremental growth in computing infrastructure and its supporting ecosystem. The upward revision in Google TPU shipments, along with the potential for further doubling by 2028, is seen as solidifying performance visibility for the entire supporting supply chain over the next two years.

marsbit1h ago

Google TPU Shipments Revised Up by 50%

marsbit1h ago

What Wall Street Really Wants After the Crypto Story Recedes

The tide of speculative crypto narratives has receded, revealing Wall Street's true objective: building a controlled, yield-generating, and compliant financial pipeline on distributed ledgers. They are migrating core functions onto blockchains, not for decentralization, but for efficiency and new revenue streams. Key developments include BlackRock's BUIDL fund, a tokenized treasury fund acting as a foundational reserve asset, and the rise of Securitize, which is going public and partnering with the NYSE to build a 24/7 digital securities trading and settlement system. This signals a major shift of securities clearing to blockchain technology. To make volatile assets like Bitcoin palatable for institutional investors, firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are creating "covered call" ETFs (e.g., BITA). These products systematically sell options on Bitcoin holdings, transforming price volatility into stable monthly income, effectively repackaging crypto as a yield-bearing asset. Stablecoins are being positioned not as speculative tools but as efficient payment rails. Companies like Stripe and Mastercard are integrating them for instant, low-cost merchant settlements and cross-border card payments, respectively. Critically, new legislation like the GENIUS Act shapes them as non-interest-bearing, heavily regulated extensions of the US dollar system. In summary, Wall Street is quietly constructing a parallel, blockchain-based financial infrastructure featuring tokenized traditional assets, structured crypto yields, and programmable dollar pipelines—all under its control and fully integrated with existing regulatory and credit frameworks.

marsbit1h ago

What Wall Street Really Wants After the Crypto Story Recedes

marsbit1h ago

Tying Itself to SpaceX: Cursor's $60 Billion Rise

This article recounts the rapid rise of AI-powered coding startup Cursor and its 25-year-old MIT graduate CEO, Michael Truell. Launched in 2023, Cursor achieved explosive growth, reaching over 10 billion USD in revenue by late 2025. However, its journey highlights a central dilemma for AI application companies: dependence on foundational model providers. Cursor initially relied heavily on Anthropic's models but faced an existential threat when Anthropic launched its own competing coding tool, Claude Code. In response, Cursor declared an internal emergency in early 2026 and accelerated development of its own model, Composer. To secure the immense computing power needed, Truell struck a pivotal deal with Elon Musk's SpaceX in April 2026. The collaboration grants Cursor access to SpaceX's supercomputing resources for Composer, while SpaceX's Grok model benefits from Cursor's programming data. The agreement includes a potential 600 billion USD acquisition of Cursor by SpaceX later in the year, though a substantial termination fee is in place if the deal falls through. The story explores Cursor's intense, sometimes controversial hiring practices involving lengthy unpaid "work trials," its complex partnership-turned-rivalry with Anthropic, and its high-stakes gamble to ensure independence through the SpaceX alliance. The core question remains: will Cursor evolve into a defining, independent "generational" software company, or become a key piece in a tech giant's AI arsenal?

marsbit1h ago

Tying Itself to SpaceX: Cursor's $60 Billion Rise

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片