美伊谈判破裂、美联储政策夹击,BTC 何去何从?

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-04-13Last updated on 2026-08-16

Abstract

当前任何触及 7万 - 8万美元区间的尝试,都因流动性不足与获利回吐压力而限制反弹幅度。

撰文:马赫,Foresight News

加密市场的大反弹仍遥遥无期。4 月 13 日,BTC 价格徘徊在 71000 美元附近,24 小时内下跌约 2.6%,ETH 表现更弱,下跌 3.63%,报约 2200 美元。比特币市值占比仍在 58.8%,整个加密板块成交量并未显著放大。

Coinglass 数据显示,过去 24 小时全网爆仓金额 2.84 亿美元,多单爆仓 2.03 亿美元。与此同时,CoinMarketCap 恐慌指数目前为 43,显示市场情绪为中性。

传统金融市场同样波动剧烈。受中东局势影响,国际油价持续高位,布伦特原油一度逼近 107 美元 / 桶,较冲突前大幅飙升。美股方面,标普 500 在 3 月累计下跌约 5%,为近年较差月度表现之一;国际股市受能源进口压力和美元走强拖累,下跌幅度更大。债券收益率上升,通胀预期重燃,投资者在风险资产间快速切换,避险需求推高黄金等传统避险品。这种跨市场联动性再次印证,加密作为高贝塔风险资产,正同步承受宏观和地缘双重冲击。

美伊谈判破裂

本周加密市场萎靡的核心驱动因素之一,正是美伊紧张局势的急剧升级。4 月 11-12 日在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡举行的美伊面对面和平谈判历时 20 余小时,最终以失败告终。

美国副总统万斯率团与伊朗代表团未能就核心分歧达成一致,包括伊朗放弃核武器计划、停止铀浓缩的「红线」。伊朗方面则指责美方「最大主义」和「不断改变目标」。

谈判破裂后,美国总统特朗普周日在社交平台宣布,美军将立即启动对霍尔木兹海峡的封锁行动。美国中央司令部(CENTCOM)随后确认,北京时间 4 月 13 日晚 10 点,封锁针对所有进出伊朗港口的船舶,但不会阻挡非伊朗港口的正常通行。伊朗外长和军方迅速回应,警告任何军事舰艇接近海峡都将视为违反停火,并保留报复权利。

霍尔木兹海峡是全球石油运输的咽喉要道,承担全球约 20% 的原油运输。一旦封锁持续,供应链中断风险将直接推高油价,进一步引发全球通胀担忧和经济增长放缓预期。这种地缘黑天鹅事件对风险资产的打击最为直接:投资者纷纷撤离高 beta 标的,转向现金或黄金,BTC 作为「数字黄金」的避险属性在短期内反而被风险厌恶情绪压制,无法发挥对冲作用。过去类似中东危机中,加密市场往往先于传统市场反应,出现剧烈回调,正是当前低迷的直接写照。

Polymarket 最新数据显示,美国与伊朗达成永久和平协议将在今年 5 月 31 号前的概率为 27%,而在本月 30 号之前的达成协议的概率降至 14%。

不过未来美伊谈判仍充满一定变数。

据《华尔街日报》报道,知情官员透露,在伊斯兰堡举行的马拉松式和平谈判未能达成协议后,中东地区各国正竞相推动美国和伊朗重返谈判桌。

尽管美伊双方都发表了强硬声明,但外交大门依然敞开,第二轮谈判可能会在几天内举行。各地区国家正与美国协商,以确保能够延长为期两周且十分脆弱的停火期。

今年美联储降息或只有 1 次

另一个关键压制因素来自货币政策面。美联储 3 月会议纪要显示,尽管伊朗冲突带来高度不确定性,决策者仍维持 2026 年仅一次降息的预期,

4 月 10 日,CPI 数据公布,美国 3 月未季调 CPI 年率 3.3%,为 2024 年 5 月以来新高,符合市场预期 3.3%,前值 2.40%。美国 3 月季调后 CPI 月率录得 0.9%,为 2022 年 6 月以来新高,符合市场预期。美国劳工统计局表示,汽油价格的创纪录上涨贡献了当月 CPI 涨幅的近四分之三。另一项剔除食品和能源成本的指标环比涨幅放缓至 0.2%。

市场原本寄望于更激进的宽松周期来提振风险资产,但油价冲击让美联储「数据依赖」策略变得更加保守。较高的能源成本可能延迟通胀回落路径,进而推迟降息落地时间。这对高度依赖流动性的加密市场而言,无疑是雪上加霜。历史上,降息预期落空往往伴随风险资产的估值重置,BTC 当前在 71,000 美元附近的盘整,正是这种宏观预期调整的映射。

目前 Polymarket 上最新数据显示,市场押注今年美联储降息 1 次 25 个基点的概率仅为 26%,而按兵不动的概率升至 44%。

市场流动性趋紧,为加密市场的反弹蒙上阴影。

获利了结压制 BTC 价格反弹

链上数据指标真实显示加密玩家的真实意图操作。glassnode 数据显示,任何触及 7 万至 8 万美元区间的尝试都面临流动性不足和获利回吐压力,从而限制了反弹幅度。

另一次反弹至 7 万美元以上的行情因每小时超 2000 万美元的获利了结而耗尽动力。

或许在部分卖家看来,本次 BTC 反弹只是阶段性,并非反转。

目前,当 BTC 价格处于 7.08 万美元时,处于亏损状态的地址数量约为 1350 万个。

这表明网络中又有相当一部分用户是在高于当前现货价格时购入比特币的。

后续行情走势

尽管短期承压,加密行业资深人士仍多持长期结构性乐观态度。

Strategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 表示,比特币很可能已在 2 月初 6 万美元附近触底,当时被迫卖出的交易者已被清洗出市场。底部更多由卖方枯竭而非估值决定。他认为当前抛压有限,ETF 资金流入正吸收每日供应,企业将财资资产配置至比特币也带来持续需求。Michael Saylor 预测下一轮牛市的催化剂将是建立在比特币之上的银行信贷和数字信贷体系的形成,这将使比特币从非生息资产转变为资本市场引擎。

BitMEX 创始人 Arthur Hayes 曾在 3 月末表示,「当前市场存在大量对未来利好前景的幻想,个人当然希望杀戮能停止,但不会在这里买入风险资产。」

Tom Lee 发文表示市场出现越来越多迹象表明「底部已形成」,尽管市场整体仍普遍持怀疑态度。如果你仍然保持怀疑,可以考虑买入在美伊战争期间表现领先的资产。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit25m ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit25m ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit1h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit1h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit3h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit3h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片