XPL uji permintaan $0,08 saat bear menekan keras: Akankah terjadi pembalikan?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

Harga Plasma (XPL) anjlok 12% dalam 24 jam, mendekati zona permintaan kritis di $0.08. Tekanan jual meningkat dengan volume perdagangan naik 38% dan indikator Bull Bear Power menunjukkan bearish yang kuat. Funding Rate negatif (-0.0437%) mengonfirmasi pesimisme trader futures, sementara aktivitas jaringan turun 12% dalam dua minggu. Meski $0.08 sebelumnya memicu pemulihan, kekuatan bearish yang berkelanjutan dan penurunan aktivitas membuat rebound sulit terjadi. Risiko downside masih ada, dan jika $0.08 ditembus, XPL berpotensi mencetak rekor rendah baru.

Beberapa minggu lalu, rantai yang terkait dengan narasi stablecoin berkembang pesat tetapi sejak itu kehilangan daya tarik. Plasma [XPL] adalah salah satunya, dengan fokus pada pembayaran stablecoin, yang juga menampilkan USDT milik Tether.

XPL kehilangan lebih dari 12% dari total kapitalisasi pasarnya hanya dalam 24 jam. Lonjakan volume perdagangan harian sebesar 38% mengkonfirmasi tekanan jual.

Selain itu, rasio perputaran koin sebesar 0,436 menunjukkan sebagian besar kapitalisasi sedang diperdagangkan. Dapatkah bull masuk seperti sebelumnya saat harga mendekati zona permintaan kunci?

XPL mendekati zona permintaan kunci

Harga XPL memperpanjang penurunannya untuk hari kedua berturut-turut menjadi 18% menyusul kerugian hari itu.

Kekuatan bear saat ini, seperti yang terlihat dari indikator Bull Bear Power yang batang-batangnya semakin membesar, mendorong harga menuju zona $0,08.

Berdasarkan indikator Market Structure Break dan OB Probability, $0,08 adalah zona permintaan kunci. Awalnya, XPL rebound dari zona ini dan mendorong harga di atas $0,10.

Meskipun penurunan ke zona $0,08 dapat memicu bull untuk membeli, kekuatan bear masih sangat terasa. Bahkan, itu meningkat dengan setiap penutupan lilin, dengan BBP di negatif 0,0148.

Nilai ini setengah dari yang berhasil dicapai oleh bear terkuat pada bulan Februari.

Penurunan ini membuat rebound potensial di $0,08 menjadi sulit dengan kondisi saat ini. Mungkin, pesimisme di antara trader dan aktivitas rantai yang rendah memperbesar kerugian.

Trader Futures Perpetual XPL dalam kondisi pesimis ekstrem

Melihat data Futures Perpetual untuk XPL, trader menunjukkan pesimisme. Tingkat Pendanaan Tertimbang OI turun tajam ke wilayah negatif, mencapai 0,0437%.

Data menunjukkan bahwa pasar terlalu ramai di sisi short, sebuah indikasi panic selling. Selain itu, para short ini membayar long untuk menjaga posisi mereka tetap terbuka serta membuka lebih banyak order jual.

Penurunan tajam ini bisa berarti risiko penurunan lebih lanjut, terutama jika bull tidak masuk. Menembus di bawah $0,08 akan menciptakan low baru untuk altcoin ini, melampaui low saat ini di $0,0709.

Aktivitas turun tajam dalam dua minggu

Aktivitas jaringan XPL juga mengikuti aksi harga. Dalam dua minggu terakhir, jumlah transaksi turun lebih dari 12%, dari 416,5K menjadi 365,9K.

Namun dari perspektif harian, transaksi naik 4,28%, sementara total biaya transaksi naik 56%. Lonjakan aktivitas ini mungkin berasal dari para trader yang menjual token tersebut.

Sementara itu, jumlah transaksi kumulatifnya berada di 155,76 juta dengan kecepatan 4,5 TPS. Secara umum, sebagian besar metrik XPL lemah, termasuk aksi harganya, yang mendekati zona permintaan kunci.


Ringkasan Akhir

  • XPL kehilangan 12% karena Tingkat Pendanaan Tertimbang OI berubah menjadi merah dan aktivitas turun tajam.
  • Harga XPL mendekati zona permintaan di $0,08, tetapi kekuatan bearish tidak kunjung reda.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QApa yang menyebabkan penurunan harga XPL sebesar 12% dalam 24 jam?

APenurunan harga XPL disebabkan oleh tekanan jual yang kuat, ditandai dengan peningkatan volume perdagangan harian sebesar 38% dan tingkat turnover ratio 0.436 yang menunjukkan sebagian besar kapitalisasi diperdagangkan.

QZona permintaan kunci yang disebutkan untuk harga XPL berada di level berapa?

AZona permintaan kunci untuk XPL berada di level $0.08, di mana sebelumnya harga sempat memantul dan naik di atas $0.10.

QApa yang ditunjukkan oleh OI-Weighted Funding Rate yang negatif untuk XPL?

AOI-Weighted Funding Rate yang negatif sebesar -0.0437% menunjukkan pesimisme ekstrem trader futures, dengan pasar didominasi posisi short dan panic selling.

QBagaimana tren aktivitas jaringan XPL dalam dua minggu terakhir?

AAktivitas jaringan XPL turun lebih dari 12% dalam dua minggu, dari 416.5K menjadi 365.9K transaksi, meski dari perspektif harian terjadi kenaikan 4.28%.

QApa risiko yang mungkin terjadi jika harga XPL break di bawah $0.08?

AJika harga XPL break di bawah $0.08, akan terbentuk low baru untuk altcoin ini yang melebihi low sebelumnya di $0.0709, menunjukkan potensi penurunan lebih lanjut.

Related Reads

The Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

A well-known and highly profitable Ethereum MEV Bot, Jaredfromsubway.eth, suffered a sophisticated on-chain attack this Saturday, losing over $7.5 million. Analysis by Blockaid and others reveals this was not a conventional phishing or smart contract exploit, but a targeted "counter-MEV honeypot attack." The attacker meticulously laid a trap over several weeks, deploying 66 fake token contracts and liquidity pools disguised as major assets like WETH and USDC. These pools created the illusion of arbitrage opportunities. The MEV Bot's automated system detected these signals, executed trades, and in the process, granted approval permissions to attacker-controlled contracts. These approvals were not revoked, creating a persistent vulnerability. The attacker then exploited this in a single transaction, draining the bot's ETH, USDC, and USDT holdings. Jaredfromsubway.eth is notorious as one of Ethereum's most active and profitable MEV Bots, primarily known for executing "sandwich attacks" to profit from transaction slippage. Estimates suggest it has earned tens of millions in MEV revenue. The incident highlights escalating crypto security threats, demonstrating that even top-tier automated "predators" are vulnerable to novel, logic-based attacks designed to exploit their own operational rules. Following the hack, an unverified X account impersonating Jaredfromsubway.eth emerged, falsely offering a bounty for the return of funds, prompting developer warnings for users to stay vigilant.

marsbit1h ago

The Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

marsbit1h ago

The Reality of Payments in Latin America Is Not What You Think

The payment landscape in Latin America is undergoing a fundamental shift, driven by on-the-ground realities that challenge common perceptions. Based on over 500 hours of field research across the region, key insights emerge. Firstly, QR code payments, like Brazil's Pix, are becoming the dominant payment method in most emerging markets, overtaking cards. However, these domestic instant payment systems lack international interoperability, creating a significant gap for cross-border users. Secondly, the narrative around crypto cards is often misunderstood; their primary volume comes from high-net-worth professionals using them for salary conversions (e.g., USDT to local currency via Pix), not retail micro-payments. Competition in payments is shifting from customer acquisition to controlling the settlement layer, leading fintechs to acquire banking licenses for efficiency. Thirdly, treating "Latin America" as a single market is a mistake. Countries like Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico have distinct economic realities, user segments, and regulatory approaches. Brazil alone has at least five distinct user segments with different financial flows. Overlooked markets like Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador (the "forgotten five") offer high remittance volumes with lower competitive density. Finally, regulation in Latin America is often ahead of the US, with clearer frameworks for digital assets and a pragmatic approach from regulators focused on safety rather than obstruction. The margin on stablecoin forex is rapidly compressing toward zero, meaning future winners will be those building value-added services on top of the infrastructure, not just the cheapest exchange.

marsbit1h ago

The Reality of Payments in Latin America Is Not What You Think

marsbit1h ago

Making Music in a Bear Market: The Survival Experiment of a Bitcoin Band

"Orange Pill Jam: A Bitcoin Band's Survival in the Bear Market" Orange Pill Jam is a musical group exploring themes of financial sovereignty and privacy, born from the Bitcoin community. Formed after singer Mermaid performed her song "Dollar Apocalypse" at a 2022 conference, the band creates music intended for both Bitcoin enthusiasts and general audiences. Their creative process involves Mermaid writing lyrics and melodies, which producer/multi-instrumentalist Michi then shapes with a precise, rhythm-focused approach, often demanding numerous retakes to achieve his unique standard of timing. Their songs, like "Cypherpunks' Manifesto" and "Fire of Freedom," tackle concepts of digital privacy, the pitfalls of "free" services, and personal sovereignty, influenced by experiences in places like El Salvador. Despite operating in a crypto bear market with a Copyleft model (offering music for free sharing/remixing and accepting optional Bitcoin donations), they face practical challenges. Their growth is slow on platforms like YouTube and Spotify, which aren't optimized for their niche content. The band also navigates the rise of AI-generated music. While acknowledging AI's efficiency for certain tasks, they believe human creativity occupies a unique space that algorithms cannot replicate—the ability to create new genres and capture intangible rhythmic feeling. For Orange Pill Jam, the core argument for both Bitcoin in a downturn and human artistry in the AI age lies in this irreplaceable, intentional, and imperfectly human creative process. Their project persists as an anti-algorithm experiment, valuing the unquantifiable impact of music over scalable metrics.

marsbit1h ago

Making Music in a Bear Market: The Survival Experiment of a Bitcoin Band

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is PLASMA

Plasma: A Cutting-Edge Solution for Blockchain Scalability Introduction to Plasma As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, there is an increasing need for enhanced efficiency within blockchain networks. Plasma, a Layer 2 scaling solution, emerges as a pioneering player in this area, particularly in the sphere of Web3 development. By strategically shifting a significant portion of tasks from the main chain to a series of smaller chains, Plasma aims to significantly enhance the scalability and performance of Ethereum—a widely-used blockchain platform that is at the forefront of decentralised applications. What is Plasma? Plasma is an innovative off-chain scaling solution specifically designed for the Ethereum blockchain. It was introduced in August 2017 by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Joseph Poon, a prominent advocate of scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Plasma serves as a framework that enables the creation of scalable applications by establishing a hierarchical structure of child chains that sit above the main Ethereum chain. At its core, Plasma facilitates the development of potentially unlimited side chains that can operate independently while still relying on the Ethereum network for security and consensus. This architecture is supported by smart contracts and Merkle Trees, which efficiently manage transactions and data storage. Core Objectives of Plasma The primary goal of Plasma is to increase the throughput of the Ethereum network. By diverting a significant volume of transactions away from the congested main chain, Plasma's architecture offers higher transaction speeds, more efficient data processing, and lower transaction costs. This is particularly crucial in an age where the demand for decentralised applications—especially in finance, gaming, and supply chain management—is reaching unprecedented levels. Creator of Plasma Plasma is the brainchild of two renowned figures in the blockchain community: Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon. Buterin is celebrated primarily for co-founding Ethereum and pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve. Poon, on the other hand, is known for advocating scalable solutions that enable faster and more cost-effective transactions on blockchain networks. Their collaboration on the Plasma framework has significantly contributed to its innovative nature, merging advanced technical insights with practical applications. Investors of Plasma While the specific investment foundations or organisations supporting Plasma remain undisclosed, the project has attracted interest from various prominent figures and players in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. With its potential for enhancing scalability within Ethereum, it has captured the attention of various entities aiming to push the boundaries of blockchain technology. How Does Plasma Work? Plasma's unique functionality stems from its architectural framework that relies on child chains and their interaction with the main Ethereum network. Below are some key factors that contribute to Plasma's innovative approach: Child Chains: Plasma establishes numerous child chains that can execute transactions independently of the main Ethereum chain. Each child chain operates as a separate smart contract with unique features, allowing developers to create tailored solutions based on their specific requirements. Smart Contracts and Merkle Trees: The framework utilises smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements with predefined conditions, combined with Merkle Trees that enable efficient verification of data. This technology allows Plasma to achieve both high scalability and security. Transaction Compression: By batching transactions on the child chains, Plasma reduces the data load on the Ethereum network. This implies that fewer transactions need to be recorded on the main chain—thereby freeing up space and alleviating congestion. Enhanced Security: Despite being off-chain, Plasma leverages the security measures of the main Ethereum network, ensuring that all transactions on child chains maintain a high level of integrity and security. Timeline of Plasma Understanding the development of Plasma involves tracing its significant milestones: August 2017: Plasma was first introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon as a scalable solution to address Ethereum's performance challenges. 2018: The Plasma framework was officially developed and made available on GitHub, marking a crucial step towards its implementation in practical applications. 2019: As awareness about Plasma grew, it began to attract developers interested in scaling Ethereum applications, thus increasing its adoption. 2020: Plasma continued evolving, with substantial enhancements made to its architecture and functionality—making it even more appealing to developers. Key Features of Plasma Plasma boasts several characteristics that position it as a transformative solution in the blockchain space: Scalability: By creating multiple child chains, Plasma can handle a higher volume of transactions without placing further strain on the main Ethereum chain. Speed: Each child chain can process transactions more rapidly, providing users with a better experience and service. Lower Transaction Costs: Plasma's structure effectively reduces the costs associated with transactions by minimising the burden on the main chain. Interoperability: The architecture allows Plasma to seamlessly interact with multiple blockchains, enhancing cross-network functionality. Security: By harnessing the security of Ethereum’s main chain, Plasma ensures the integrity of its operations while using its child chains. Use Cases for Plasma The innovative architecture of Plasma opens the door for various practical applications across different sectors: Decentralised Finance (DeFi): Plasma has the capacity to enhance the scalability and efficiency of DeFi applications, creating smoother and more effective trading processes. Gaming: The framework facilitates the development of quick and cost-efficient gaming experiences, making it appealing to developers in the gaming industry. Supply Chain Management: With the ability to achieve efficient transaction processing, Plasma can promote the development of decentralised supply chain management solutions. Conclusion Plasma stands at the forefront of blockchain technology, positioned as a pivotal Layer 2 scaling solution aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Ethereum network and beyond. Through its unique structure of child chains, smart contracts, and Merkle Trees, Plasma presents a compelling solution to the scalability crisis that has long plagued blockchain networks. As blockchain technology continues to advance, solutions like Plasma promise to reshape how developers approach scalability challenges, potentially revolutionising how decentralised applications function. The ongoing efforts by its creators and the interest of various stakeholders indicate a bright future for Plasma as it seeks to elevate blockchain capabilities to new heights in the digital realm.

188 Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.03Updated 2024.12.03

What is PLASMA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XPL (XPL) are presented below.

活动图片