XPL kiểm tra vùng cầu $0.08 khi phe gấu ép bán mạnh: Đảo chiều sắp tới?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

XPL đã giảm hơn 12% giá trị vốn hóa chỉ trong 24 giờ, với áp lực bán mạnh đẩy giá về gần vùng hỗ trợ quan trọng 0,08 USD. Mặc dù đây từng là vùng kích hoạt mua trước đó, sức mạnh giảm giá vẫn duy trì khi chỉ số Bull Bear Power (BBP) đạt -0.0148. Dữ liệu Futures cho thấy tâm lý bi quan cực độ khi tỷ lệ tài trợ (Funding Rate) âm sâu ở mức 0.0437%, đồng thời khối lượng giao dịch hàng ngày tăng 38% cho thấy nhiều lệnh bán. Hoạt động mạng lưới cũng suy yếu với số giao dịch giảm 12% trong hai tuần. Nếu giá phá vỡ dưới 0,08 USD, XPL có nguy cơ giảm sâu hơn và thiết lập mức đáy mới.

Vài tuần trước, các chuỗi liên quan đến xu hướng stablecoin đã phát triển mạnh nhưng kể từ đó đã mất đi sự nổi bật. Plasma [XPL] là một trong số đó, với trọng tâm vào thanh toán bằng stablecoin, vốn cũng có sự góp mặt của USDT của Tether.

XPL đã mất hơn 12% tổng vốn hóa thị trường chỉ trong 24 giờ. Mức tăng đột biến 38% về khối lượng giao dịch hàng ngày xác nhận áp lực bán.

Ngoài ra, hệ số luân chuyển của đồng tiền này là 0,436 cho thấy một phần đáng kể vốn hóa đang được giao dịch. Liệu phe bò có thể vào cuộc như trước đây khi giá tiếp cận vùng cầu quan trọng?

XPL tiếp cận vùng cầu quan trọng

Giá XPL tiếp tục giảm trong ngày thứ hai liên tiếp, lên tới 18% sau những thua lỗ trong ngày.

Sức mạnh của phe gấu hiện tại, rõ ràng từ chỉ báo Bull Bear Power với các thanh ngày càng tăng về kích thước, đang đẩy giá về phía vùng $0,08.

Theo chỉ báo Market Structure Break và OB Probability, vùng $0,08 là vùng cầu quan trọng. Ban đầu, XPL đã bật tăng trở lại từ vùng này và đẩy giá vượt trên $0,10.

Mặc dù việc giảm xuống vùng $0,08 có thể kích hoạt phe bò mua vào, nhưng sức mạnh của phe gấu vẫn còn hiện diện rõ rệt. Trên thực tế, nó đã tăng lên sau mỗi lần đóng nến, với BBP ở mức âm 0,0148.

Giá trị này chỉ bằng một nửa so với mức mà phe gấu mạnh nhất trong tháng Hai đã đạt được.

Đợt giảm giá này khiến một đợt phục hồi tiềm năng ở mức $0,08 trở nên khó khăn trong các điều kiện hiện tại. Có lẽ, tâm lý bi quan trong giới giao dịch và hoạt động chuỗi thấp đã khuếch đại các khoản lỗ.

Nhà giao dịch Hợp đồng Tương lai Perpetual của XPL ở trạng thái cực kỳ bi quan

Nhìn vào dữ liệu Hợp đồng Tương lai Perpetual cho XPL, các nhà giao dịch tỏ ra bi quan. Tỷ lệ Tài trợ Tính theo OI đã giảm mạnh vào vùng âm, chạm mức 0,0437%.

Dữ liệu cho thấy thị trường đang tập trung quá mức vào phe bán, một dấu hiệu của bán tháo hoảng loạn. Hơn nữa, những vị thế bán khống này đang trả tiền cho phe mua để giữ các vị thế của họ mở cũng như mở thêm các lệnh bán.

Đợt giảm mạnh này có thể đồng nghĩa với rủi ro giảm giá thêm, đặc biệt nếu phe bò không vào cuộc. Việc phá vỡ dưới $0,08 sẽ tạo ra mức thấp mới cho altcoin này, vượt qua mức thấp hiện tại là $0,0709.

Hoạt động giảm mạnh trong hai tuần

Hoạt động mạng lưới của XPL cũng diễn biến theo hành động giá. Trong hai tuần qua, số lượng giao dịch đã giảm hơn 12%, từ 416,5K xuống 365,9K.

Nhưng từ góc độ hàng ngày, các giao dịch tăng 4,28%, trong khi tổng phí giao dịch tăng 56%. Đợt tăng đột biến về hoạt động này có lẽ là từ các nhà giao dịch đang bán token.

Trong khi đó, số lượng giao dịch tích lũy của nó đạt 155,76 triệu với tốc độ 4,5 TPS. Nhìn chung, hầu hết các chỉ số của XPL đều yếu, bao gồm cả hành động giá, vốn đang tiếp cận một vùng cầu quan trọng.


Tóm tắt cuối cùng

  • XPL mất 12% khi Tỷ lệ Tài trợ Tính theo OI chuyển sang màu đỏ và hoạt động giảm mạnh.
  • Giá XPL đang tiếp cận vùng cầu ở mức $0,08, nhưng sức mạnh giảm giá vẫn không suy giảm.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Latin America's Payments Landscape Is Not What You Think It Is

This report challenges common misconceptions about Latin America's payment landscape, based on over 500 hours of firsthand research. Key findings include: 1) Crypto card transaction volume primarily comes from high-net-worth individuals receiving USDT salaries, not retail spending. 2) QR code payments (e.g., Brazil's Pix, Argentina's Mercado Pago) are the dominant payment method across most emerging markets, not cards. 3) A major untapped opportunity lies in enabling cross-border interoperability between domestic instant payment systems. 4) Payment competition is shifting from customer acquisition to owning the settlement layer (e.g., acquiring banks). 5) Latin America is not a single market; Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and smaller "forgotten five" countries (e.g., Guatemala, Honduras) have vastly different dynamics. 6) Stablecoin-to-fiat conversion margins are collapsing toward zero, pushing companies to build value-added services on top. 7) Future payment winners will be multi-country brands, not single-corridor specialists. 8) Marketing must target specific user segments (e.g., digital nomads, unbanked immigrants) with tailored messaging, not a generic "Brazilian" audience. 9) Contrary to perception, Latin American regulators are often ahead of the US in creating frameworks for digital assets and instant payments, with clear licensing deadlines. The core takeaway is that the region's payment rules are being rewritten, moving beyond cards and stablecoin arbitrage towards integrated, cross-border QR-based solutions.

链捕手5m ago

Latin America's Payments Landscape Is Not What You Think It Is

链捕手5m ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is PLASMA

Plasma: A Cutting-Edge Solution for Blockchain Scalability Introduction to Plasma As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, there is an increasing need for enhanced efficiency within blockchain networks. Plasma, a Layer 2 scaling solution, emerges as a pioneering player in this area, particularly in the sphere of Web3 development. By strategically shifting a significant portion of tasks from the main chain to a series of smaller chains, Plasma aims to significantly enhance the scalability and performance of Ethereum—a widely-used blockchain platform that is at the forefront of decentralised applications. What is Plasma? Plasma is an innovative off-chain scaling solution specifically designed for the Ethereum blockchain. It was introduced in August 2017 by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Joseph Poon, a prominent advocate of scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Plasma serves as a framework that enables the creation of scalable applications by establishing a hierarchical structure of child chains that sit above the main Ethereum chain. At its core, Plasma facilitates the development of potentially unlimited side chains that can operate independently while still relying on the Ethereum network for security and consensus. This architecture is supported by smart contracts and Merkle Trees, which efficiently manage transactions and data storage. Core Objectives of Plasma The primary goal of Plasma is to increase the throughput of the Ethereum network. By diverting a significant volume of transactions away from the congested main chain, Plasma's architecture offers higher transaction speeds, more efficient data processing, and lower transaction costs. This is particularly crucial in an age where the demand for decentralised applications—especially in finance, gaming, and supply chain management—is reaching unprecedented levels. Creator of Plasma Plasma is the brainchild of two renowned figures in the blockchain community: Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon. Buterin is celebrated primarily for co-founding Ethereum and pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve. Poon, on the other hand, is known for advocating scalable solutions that enable faster and more cost-effective transactions on blockchain networks. Their collaboration on the Plasma framework has significantly contributed to its innovative nature, merging advanced technical insights with practical applications. Investors of Plasma While the specific investment foundations or organisations supporting Plasma remain undisclosed, the project has attracted interest from various prominent figures and players in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. With its potential for enhancing scalability within Ethereum, it has captured the attention of various entities aiming to push the boundaries of blockchain technology. How Does Plasma Work? Plasma's unique functionality stems from its architectural framework that relies on child chains and their interaction with the main Ethereum network. Below are some key factors that contribute to Plasma's innovative approach: Child Chains: Plasma establishes numerous child chains that can execute transactions independently of the main Ethereum chain. Each child chain operates as a separate smart contract with unique features, allowing developers to create tailored solutions based on their specific requirements. Smart Contracts and Merkle Trees: The framework utilises smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements with predefined conditions, combined with Merkle Trees that enable efficient verification of data. This technology allows Plasma to achieve both high scalability and security. Transaction Compression: By batching transactions on the child chains, Plasma reduces the data load on the Ethereum network. This implies that fewer transactions need to be recorded on the main chain—thereby freeing up space and alleviating congestion. Enhanced Security: Despite being off-chain, Plasma leverages the security measures of the main Ethereum network, ensuring that all transactions on child chains maintain a high level of integrity and security. Timeline of Plasma Understanding the development of Plasma involves tracing its significant milestones: August 2017: Plasma was first introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon as a scalable solution to address Ethereum's performance challenges. 2018: The Plasma framework was officially developed and made available on GitHub, marking a crucial step towards its implementation in practical applications. 2019: As awareness about Plasma grew, it began to attract developers interested in scaling Ethereum applications, thus increasing its adoption. 2020: Plasma continued evolving, with substantial enhancements made to its architecture and functionality—making it even more appealing to developers. Key Features of Plasma Plasma boasts several characteristics that position it as a transformative solution in the blockchain space: Scalability: By creating multiple child chains, Plasma can handle a higher volume of transactions without placing further strain on the main Ethereum chain. Speed: Each child chain can process transactions more rapidly, providing users with a better experience and service. Lower Transaction Costs: Plasma's structure effectively reduces the costs associated with transactions by minimising the burden on the main chain. Interoperability: The architecture allows Plasma to seamlessly interact with multiple blockchains, enhancing cross-network functionality. Security: By harnessing the security of Ethereum’s main chain, Plasma ensures the integrity of its operations while using its child chains. Use Cases for Plasma The innovative architecture of Plasma opens the door for various practical applications across different sectors: Decentralised Finance (DeFi): Plasma has the capacity to enhance the scalability and efficiency of DeFi applications, creating smoother and more effective trading processes. Gaming: The framework facilitates the development of quick and cost-efficient gaming experiences, making it appealing to developers in the gaming industry. Supply Chain Management: With the ability to achieve efficient transaction processing, Plasma can promote the development of decentralised supply chain management solutions. Conclusion Plasma stands at the forefront of blockchain technology, positioned as a pivotal Layer 2 scaling solution aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Ethereum network and beyond. Through its unique structure of child chains, smart contracts, and Merkle Trees, Plasma presents a compelling solution to the scalability crisis that has long plagued blockchain networks. As blockchain technology continues to advance, solutions like Plasma promise to reshape how developers approach scalability challenges, potentially revolutionising how decentralised applications function. The ongoing efforts by its creators and the interest of various stakeholders indicate a bright future for Plasma as it seeks to elevate blockchain capabilities to new heights in the digital realm.

187 Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.03Updated 2024.12.03

What is PLASMA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XPL (XPL) are presented below.

活动图片