Can VIRTUAL hold its 21% gain as active users return to 3.7K?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-03Last updated on 2026-01-03

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL], an artificial intelligence token, has defied expectations of a potential weak performance following projections of a bubble phase, instead extending its move to the upside.

The asset, which had been on a downward trajectory after recording a 12% loss, emerged as the top gainer over the past day, posting a 21% rally at press time.

This move followed a community vote in which more than 86,000 out of 104,000 investors turned bullish, representing roughly 83% of participants. The shift has since been reflected across both on-chain and off-chain user activity.

User growth and revenue support price action

Investor activity around VIRTUAL has remained elevated. According to Artemis, there has been a noticeable increase in both user engagement and protocol revenue over the past day.

Data shows that the number of active spot users trading VIRTUAL across decentralized exchanges climbed to 3,700, a level last seen on the 19th of December.

The rising trading volume suggests increased adoption and usage of VIRTUAL, which has translated into price appreciation and stronger revenue performance.

DeFiLlama data shows that protocol revenue generated over the past day alone exceeded $26,000, a level last recorded in mid-December when broader market sentiment remained deeply fearful.

The combined rise in user participation and revenue points to a strengthening positive outlook that could support further price growth.

Other drivers remain in place

The derivatives market has also played a key role in VIRTUAL’s recent performance, driven by rising liquidity from investors opening long positions.

Market data indicates that liquidity surged by more than $24.4 million over the past day, with the majority of flows linked to buy-side contracts.

CoinGlass data on the Open-Interest-Weighted Funding Rate, which reflects perpetual market liquidity based on long and short positioning, supports this trend.

A positive Funding Rate typically signals buyer dominance in the perpetual market. At press time, the rate stood at 0.0055%, indicating a moderately bullish environment.

Similarly, long-to-short data, which tracks relative buy and sell volume, shows stronger buy pressure, with more long contracts changing hands than short positions.

Unfilled levels remain a key risk

An analysis of liquidation clusters on the price chart shows that downside risk remains.

Liquidation clusters often act as price magnets and can function as either support or resistance zones. These areas are typically highlighted in different shades, including green and yellow.

At present, a larger concentration of liquidity clusters remains below the current price, indicating that downside pressure still outweighs upward pull.

However, the risk of a sharp decline appears limited, as short liquidations have exceeded long liquidations, giving long traders a relative advantage.

At the time of writing, short liquidations stood at $491,000, compared with $134,000 in long liquidations.


Final Thoughts

  • VIRTUAL saw a majority of community members vote in favor of a rally as capital inflows reached $24.4 million.
  • On-chain activity remains positive, while revenue and active user numbers continue to grow.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage gain of VIRTUAL token at press time, and what was the key community activity that preceded this rally?

AVIRTUAL posted a 21% rally at press time. This move was preceded by a community vote in which more than 86,000 out of 104,000 investors (roughly 83%) turned bullish.

QAccording to Artemis data, what was the significance of the number of active spot traders reaching 3,700?

AThe number of active spot users trading VIRTUAL climbed to 3,700, a level of user engagement last seen on the 19th of December.

QHow much protocol revenue did VIRTUAL generate in the past day, and how does this compare to a previous period?

AThe protocol revenue generated over the past day alone exceeded $26,000, a level last recorded in mid-December.

QWhat does a positive Open-Interest-Weighted Funding Rate of 0.0055% indicate about the market sentiment for VIRTUAL?

AA positive Funding Rate of 0.0055% typically signals buyer dominance in the perpetual market, indicating a moderately bullish environment.

QWhat is the current risk indicated by the larger concentration of liquidation clusters below VIRTUAL's price, and what data suggests the risk of a sharp decline is limited?

AThe larger concentration of liquidity clusters below the current price indicates that downside pressure still outweighs upward pull. However, the risk of a sharp decline appears limited because short liquidations ($491,000) have exceeded long liquidations ($134,000), giving long traders a relative advantage.

Related Reads

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit5m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit5m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit15m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit15m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit29m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit29m ago

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit31m ago

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy GAIN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing GriffinAI (GAIN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy GriffinAI (GAIN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your GriffinAI (GAIN)After purchasing your GriffinAI (GAIN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade GriffinAI (GAIN)Easily trade GriffinAI (GAIN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.09.24Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy GAIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of GAIN (GAIN) are presented below.

活动图片