Dua Pendiri Blockchain Tua Tiongkok NEO Bertengkar, Transparansi Keuangan Jadi Penyebab Utama

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-01Last updated on 2026-01-01

Abstract

**Ringkasan: Konflik Pendiri NEO Terbuka, Transparansi Keuangan Jadi Isu Inti** Konflik antara dua pendiri NEO, Erik Zhang (Zhang Zhengwen) dan Da Hongfei, memanas di media sosial. Inti permasalahannya adalah kurangnya transparansi keuangan dalam yayasan NEO. Zhang, yang sebelumnya sempat hengkang, kembali pada September lalu dan langsung meminta laporan keuangan detail serta aliran dana yayasan, namun menghadapi kendala. Zhang menuduh yayasan di bawah kendali tunggal Da Hongfei beroperasi bagai "kotak hitam" dan menggunakan sumber daya NEO untuk mengembangkan proyek blockchain independen, EON. Ia juga menyebutkan bahwa ekosistem NEO sebelumnya hanya menciptakan "kemakmuran palsu" melalui hackathon tanpa pengguna yang nyata. Sebagai balasan, Da Hongfei menuduh Zhang justru mengendalikan sebagian besar aset inti NEO/GAS dan hak suara node konsensus, serta menunda pemindahan dana ke alamat multisig yayasan. Da berjanji akan merilis laporan keuangan untuk akhir tahun 2025 pada kuartal pertama 2026. Zhang secara sepihak mengumumkan bahwa mulai 1 Januari 2026, Da akan fokus pada pengembangan sidechain NeoX dan proyek SpoonOS, dan tidak lagi terlibat dalam urusan mainnet NEO.

Tidak disangka blockchain tua Tiongkok bisa mengalami hari seperti ini, yang lebih menyedihkan adalah, proyek AI top Tiongkok seperti Manus, Kimi, Minimax selama dua hari berturut-turut memiliki berita besar, baik diakuisisi puluhan miliar dolar AS maupun pendanaan ratusan juta, tetapi blockchain tua malah mulai bertengkar.

Saat ini, dua pendiri bersama blockchain NEO yang didirikan tahun 2014, Zhang Zhengwen (Erik Zhang) dan Da Hongfei, pada dasarnya telah benar-benar putus, dan masih saling menyindir di X. Berdasarkan pernyataan kedua belah pihak, serta informasi publik online, mencoba memahami apa yang sebenarnya terjadi antara dua pendiri blockchain tua ini.

Kotak Hitam Keuangan

Sebenarnya Zhang Zhengwen telah meninggalkan NEO beberapa tahun yang lalu, ini juga dikonfirmasi di twitternya sendiri, kemudian secara resmi kembali pada bulan September tahun ini. Pemicu pertengkaran ini terjadi pada bulan November, menurut pesan komunitas dan data publik, Zhang Zhengwen sebagai inti teknis mengalami hambatan ketika mencari laporan keuangan detail dan aliran dana yayasan Neo.

Kemudian Zhang Zhengwen menuduh yayasan Neo telah beroperasi tidak transparan dalam jangka panjang, kondisi aset seperti "kotak hitam". Dia menunjuk, Da Hongfei telah lama mengendalikan secara tunggal aset yayasan selain token NEO/GAS, dan kurangnya mekanisme pengungkapan yang lengkap dan dapat diaudit.

Dalam saling sindir kedua belah pihak hari ini, kami juga menemukan alasan Zhang Zhengwen meninggalkan sebelumnya, dia berkata Da Hongfei secara terpisah mencarinya, berkata bahwa efisiensi rendah jika dua orang bertanggung jawab atas NEO, jadi dia memilih untuk sementara keluar dari manajemen untuk "meningkatkan efisiensi". Namun, dia menemukan Da Hongfei menggunakan sumber daya NEO untuk mengembangkan proyek blockchain independen EON. Ini juga mendorongnya untuk kembali dan turut campur dalam tata kelola yayasan.

Dalam komunikasi komunitas bulan November, Zhang Zhengwen pernah menyatakan NEO sebelumnya mengandalkan hackathon untuk menciptakan "kemakmuran palsu", tidak ada pengguna nyata, banyak proyek hackathon menghilang setelah memenangkan hadiah.

Eskalasi Konflik

Pada bulan Desember, Zhang Zhengwen merilis pernyataan publik, menuntut Da Hongfei memenuhi kewajiban pengungkapan keuangan yang dijanjikan sejak 9 Desember. Yang lebih eksplosif adalah, Zhang Zhengwen secara sepihak mengumumkan, berdasarkan perjanjian telepon sebelumnya, mulai 1 Januari 2026, Da Hongfei tidak akan lagi berpartisipasi dalam urusan mainnet NEO, beralih fokus pada pengembangan dan operasi sidechain NeoX dan proyek baru SpoonOS.

Da Hongfei juga segera merespons, berkata bahwa Zhang Zhengwen sebenarnya mengendalikan sebagian besar dana di ekosistem NEO (termasuk aset inti token NEO dan GAS), dan mendominasi hak suara node konsensus, juga menuduh Zhang Zhengwen selama bertahun-tahun dengan berbagai alasan (seperti menunggu migrasi N3 selesai) menunda transfer dana ke alamat multisig yayasan (Multisig).

Da Hongfei berkomitmen akan merilis laporan keuangan akhir tahun 2025 pada kuartal pertama tahun 2026, dan akan berbagi data awal sebelumnya.

Related Questions

QApa yang menjadi penyebab utama perselisihan antara dua pendiri NEO, Erik Zhang dan Da Hongfei?

APenyebab utama perselisihan adalah ketidaktransparanan keuangan dalam yayasan NEO, di mana Erik Zhang menuduh Da Hongfei mengontrol aset yayasan secara tunggal tanpa mekanisme pengungkapan yang dapat diaudit.

QMengapa Erik Zhang sempat meninggalkan NEO sebelum kembali pada September tahun ini?

AErik Zhang meninggalkan NEO karena Da Hongfei mengatakan bahwa kepemimpinan bersama mereka tidak efisien, dan ia memilih keluar untuk 'meningkatkan efisiensi', tetapi kemudian mengetahui Da Hongfei menggunakan sumber daya NEO untuk mengembangkan proyek blockchain independen EON.

QApa yang dimaksud dengan 'kotak hitam' yang disebutkan Erik Zhang terkait keuangan NEO?

A'Kotak hitam' merujuk pada kondisi aset yayasan NEO yang tidak transparan, di mana aliran dana dan laporan keuangan detail sulit diakses atau diaudit oleh pihak lain.

QApa tanggapan Da Hongfei terhadap tuduhan Erik Zhang tentang kontrol keuangan?

ADa Hongfei membalas dengan menyatakan bahwa Erik Zhang justru mengontrol sebagian besar aset ekosistem NEO (termasuk token NEO dan GAS) dan hak suara node konsensus, serta menunda transfer dana ke alamat multisig yayasan.

QApa komitmen yang diumumkan Da Hongfei terkait laporan keuangan NEO?

ADa Hongfei berkomitmen untuk merilis laporan keuangan akhir tahun 2025 pada kuartal pertama 2026 dan akan berbagi data awal sebelumnya.

Related Reads

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns investors against excessive concentration in AI stocks. He argues the current market, dominated by a few AI giants, mirrors historical patterns where revolutionary new technologies lead to high risk, volatility, and uncertainty. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential, Dalio emphasizes that most investors fail at this stage of the cycle by over-concentrating in a handful of leading companies. He cites inherent risks: companies cannot accurately forecast investment needs or external shocks (e.g., monetary policy, geopolitics, taxes), face potential disruption from future technologies and international competition (notably from China), and experience significant price swings. Dalio's core advice is diversification, calling it his "Holy Grail of Investing." He presents a mathematical case that a well-diversified portfolio of 15-20 uncorrelated, good bets offers a superior risk-adjusted return compared to a concentrated position. Dalio also offers a cautious outlook, suggesting U.S. stocks may deliver real returns of -5% to -10% over the next 5-10 years based on valuation and bubble indicators. He concludes that in the face of high uncertainty, the prudent strategy is not to avoid betting entirely, but to avoid large, concentrated bets where one lacks sufficient informational edge. Instead, investors should build a strategically balanced, diversified portfolio.

marsbit1h ago

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

marsbit1h ago

Rain Valuation Approaches $20 Billion: The Battle for U-Cards Extends to Rewards Systems

Rain, a stablecoin payments infrastructure company, is shifting the competitive focus for U Cards from simple issuance to user retention and repeated usage. On June 15, Rain launched "Rain Rewards," an embedded loyalty program capability within its card-issuing infrastructure. This allows partner businesses—like fintech platforms and neobanks—to configure branded loyalty points, earning rules, redemptions, and merchant promotions directly within their card products. The system, built from the 2025 acquisition of Uptop, ensures points are only issued upon final transaction settlement, preventing liabilities from refunds. Trials, such as with Avalanche Card, reportedly boosted spending by 25% among enrolled users. Founded by Farooq Malik and Charles Yoo-Naut, Rain evolved from a tool for managing Web3 company expenses into a full-stack enterprise platform. It is a Principal Member of Visa and Mastercard, enabling partners to issue stablecoin-backed cards and wallets while leveraging traditional payment networks. Notably, the popular U Card Plasma One is issued by Rain under Visa's authority. Rain also integrates with Visa's stablecoin settlement pilot, using USDC for network settlement. Rain's rapid funding reflects growing institutional interest in stablecoin payment infrastructure. It raised a $245 million Series A in March 2025, a $58 million Series B in August 2025, and a $250 million Series C in January of this year, reaching a $19.5 billion valuation. Annualized transaction volume exceeds $3 billion, serving over 200 partners including Western Union and Nuvei. Beyond cards, Rain is expanding into programmable payments. Its June 2026 "Agent Control Layer" allows businesses to set spending rules—like merchant categories, amounts, and frequency—for AI agents before transactions occur. This positions Rain not as a single product but as an operating system for stablecoin payments, handling everything from card issuance and wallet management to rewards, on/off-ramps, and automated compliance. The goal is to enable seamless, often invisible, real-world spending of on-chain assets.

Foresight News1h ago

Rain Valuation Approaches $20 Billion: The Battle for U-Cards Extends to Rewards Systems

Foresight News1h ago

Google TPU Shipments Revised Up by 50%

Recent industry research indicates a significant upward revision in the shipments of Google's TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) chips. Previous expectations for 2027 were set at around 10 million units, but new estimates now point to 15 million units, a 50% increase. This substantial boost directly translates to higher demand across the entire supporting supply chain. Google's TPU clusters utilize a standardized all-optical interconnect architecture. Consequently, key hardware components are deeply integrated and scaled in fixed ratios with the chips. The 15 million TPU target will drive corresponding demand increases for NPO optical engines (roughly a 1:1 match), 1.6T optical modules, OCS optical switches, high-end server power supplies, fiber optics & MPO connectors, and liquid cooling solutions. Among these, liquid cooling is highlighted as the sector experiencing the most significant transformation and offering the most stable potential for excess returns. As next-generation TPU chips reach power levels where traditional air cooling is insufficient, liquid cooling becomes essential. 2026 is forecasted as the first year of substantial adoption for Google's liquid cooling solutions. This shift, coupled with delivery and capacity bottlenecks faced by incumbent overseas manufacturers, is creating a prime window for domestic Chinese suppliers to enter and secure Google's core supply chain. The market size for Google-specific liquid cooling is projected to potentially triple from a baseline of hundreds of billions to around 300 billion units by 2028. The logic for the fiber optic sector is also being rewritten. Once considered a cyclical commodity tied to telecom operator procurement, fiber is now a strategic and scarce resource for AI Data Centers (AIDC). A severe supply-demand imbalance, driven by the long lead time for preform production (18-24 months) and surging demand from cloud giants, is supporting strong performance. Chinese fiber manufacturers are well-positioned to capture a significant share of global AIDC demand, with exports potentially reaching 200-300 million core kilometers in 2026. Overall, the investment focus within the AI computing industry is shifting from pure "chip performance speculation" towards the more certain incremental growth in computing infrastructure and its supporting ecosystem. The upward revision in Google TPU shipments, along with the potential for further doubling by 2028, is seen as solidifying performance visibility for the entire supporting supply chain over the next two years.

marsbit2h ago

Google TPU Shipments Revised Up by 50%

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy CORE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing CORE (CORE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy CORE (CORE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your CORE (CORE)After purchasing your CORE (CORE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade CORE (CORE)Easily trade CORE (CORE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy CORE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CORE (CORE) are presented below.

活动图片