12月22日：BTC、ETH、SOL、LIGHT、MERL、PIPPIN行情分析

金色财经Published on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

12月22日加密货币行情分析：比特币（BTC）现价89240美元，处于震荡区间，顶部压力位89.5K-90K，突破失败可能继续下跌。短期波动区间上轨90500，下轨87900，关键支撑在82569-85710，强支撑位于78000-79050。宏观层面下跌空间有限，反弹或在未来一个月出现。以太坊（ETH）站上3000美元，多单可部分止盈或设保本止损，目标看3144、3269。若回调至2980-2950可考虑介入。 SOL表现疲软，涨幅不足3%，主力资金集中在BTC和ETH。本周压力位134附近可考虑做空，次空点131.5。 LIGHT凌晨突遭砸盘，山寨币风险高，建议关注XPIN、NIGHT、BEAT等币种，等待明确信号再操作。 MERL多次冲击0.5美元后回落，12月集中解锁7000万枚，抛压严重，建议逢高做空，目标0.3，止损0.52以上。 PIPPIN涨幅超200倍，日线两次冲高回落，大概率见顶。整体市场波动较大，建议谨慎操作，避免盲目追高。

周末的比特币缺乏流动性,交易量,波动下降严重,不过好在周末结束了抛压趋势,昨晚开始最高又回到了90000美金左右。

周线级别有止跌信号,宏观层面目前看不到下跌的理由,当前区间属于下跌有限上涨无限的位置,反弹需求将在未来一个月出现。

2026年Q1川普扬言要直接发?,所以希望还是蛮大的,不过到时候还要具体问题具体分析。

BTC

现价89240,依然处于大震荡市场中 89.5K-90K目前看作震荡区间的顶部压力位(做空) 突破失败继续下跌,看涨需要完全突破这个区间短期围绕这个震荡支撑阻力位置做交易

当前波动上轨在90500,下轨在87900,对应的短线压制在90777~92410(不做空),短线支撑在85710~82569

第二压制93668~95240(放量突破后回踩可入;仅抵达,回踩短线压制可入),第二支撑83540~82650

箱体外部: 往上,10万大关±2000U的压制不变,参考98110~101116, 往下,79050~78000的支撑有效,75750~74635的支撑有效。

ETH

ETH 经过两天的盘整终于是站上了3000的位置持有多单的可以设置保本止损或者止盈一部分了接下来的目标 3144,3269 两个位置。

今天美股开盘回向下回调一下继续上涨,手上没有多单的可以等个回调大概在2980-2950

SOL

SOL3天过去了上涨幅度连3%都不到...就挺可悲的链上的造福效益也不好,主力资金只认BTC\ETH.本周反弹一下后,后市还将继续下探新低。

本周最大压力是134,这里是116反弹上来的波段最高点。接近133.85附近都可重点做空,这里做空短线上盈亏比最大。次空点是131.5附近。

LIGHT

LIGHT凌晨突然砸盘,多头几乎没有反应时间。在小币里,这不是意外,是常见操作。说句直白的: 这类币,大多数人是赚不到钱的。周期极短、节奏极快,结局往往不是横盘出货,就是一路走向归零。

目前山寨整体位置并不稳, 别急着满仓、别被几根大阳线带节奏。现阶段我更愿意放在观察池里的,是 $XPIN 、 $NIGHT 、 $BEAT 这些方向, 不抢、不追, 等结构走清楚、信号给出来,再考虑动手。市场不缺机会, 缺的是在情绪最热的时候, 还能稳得住的人。

MERL

MERL最近三次摸0.5美元附近,每次都冲上去没多久就掉头往下砸,抛压重得要命,典型的量价背离,12月解锁量太集中了,12、15、16、19号几天加起来7000万枚直接进流通,卖压这么实、这么确定,买盘却没什么像样的支撑,价格很容易先慢慢阴跌,预期一发酵就可能加速往下走.

倾向于逢高开空,短期目标我自己定在0.3那片支撑,止损放0.52上面,反正解锁前这段时间,我是宁可空着也不想硬抗这波压力。

PIPPIN

PIPPIN拉了二百多倍,日线有两次的冲顶回落,这个币大概率见顶了。昨天二次冲顶的时候没有看到,真的是太可惜了。

如果觉得我们的内容不错,就把我们的公众号分享给你的小伙伴吧!欢迎加入关注关照,了解币圈最新信息!每一波暴跌后迎来的都是星辰大海,对后续行情布局相当迷茫的可以关注甜梦,交硫葳:RFGH8689

Trending Cryptos

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Circle Q2 revenue falls short of Wall Street estimates

Circle reported second-quarter fiscal 2026 revenue and reserve income of $701 million, a 7% year-over-year increase, but slightly missed Wall Street estimates averaging $713.32 million. Net income from continuing operations was $48 million. The company noted a 5% rise in reserve income, driven by a 25% increase in average USDC circulation. Despite the earnings miss, shares rose 5.7% in pre-market trading. Circle announced the founding validators for its upcoming Arc blockchain, set to launch on September 16, including major firms like BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard. Management raised its full-year guidance for other revenue, which includes Arc token presale revenue, to $310-$330 million from $150-$170 million. The results come amid a broader stablecoin market contraction, with total supply falling to $153 billion. Circle's USDC, with a $72 billion circulating supply, remains the second-largest stablecoin. According to a Talos spokesperson, USDC facilitated 72% of the $15.6 trillion in adjusted on-chain transfer volume in the quarter.

cointelegraph2m ago

Circle Q2 revenue falls short of Wall Street estimates

cointelegraph2m ago

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is reportedly drafting a ban on importing new models of Chinese-made optical transceiver modules, with a potential implementation target of 2026. This "decoupling" move comes as Chinese firms, led by industry leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink, dominate the global optical module market with over 60% share, and hold an even larger position in the high-speed 800G and 1.6T segments critical for AI data centers. Market reactions were mixed: U.S. optical module stocks initially rose, while Chinese A-shares opened lower but largely recovered by the close. Analysis suggests a complete U.S. decoupling from Chinese modules faces significant hurdles. North American cloud giants (Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon) and NVIDIA have massive demand for high-speed modules, estimated at around 40 million units in 2026. U.S. manufacturers' combined monthly production capacity for these modules is less than one-fifth that of a single major Chinese player like Zhongji Innolight, which reported production of 23.76 million units in 2025. Chinese companies are heavily reliant on the U.S. market, with over 90% of revenue for top firms coming from overseas, primarily the U.S. However, they have begun mitigating risks by establishing assembly plants in Southeast Asia and Mexico. Industry observers note the final impact depends on whether any potential U.S. restrictions target specific companies or products based on origin. Past U.S. sanctions on Chinese tech firms have often spurred increased domestic R&D and market diversification. Despite initial stock volatility, shares of major Chinese optical module companies pared losses, indicating market belief in the sector's resilience and the practical difficulties of abruptly replacing Chinese supply.

marsbit10m ago

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

marsbit10m ago

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

The competition in chip manufacturing equipment is no longer solely about who has the most advanced technology. While performance, yield, and cost remain key, U.S. export controls are adding a critical new dimension: long-term supply chain reliability. Major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix, despite having mature supply chains with leading American and European vendors, are reportedly evaluating etching equipment from China's AMEC for their Chinese factories. This move is not primarily about immediate replacement or AMEC's current capabilities. Instead, it's a risk mitigation strategy. Companies are concerned that future U.S. policies could disrupt their access to spare parts, software updates, and maintenance for existing equipment over its decade-long lifespan. For chipmakers investing billions in fabs with long planning cycles, this policy-induced uncertainty is a significant new risk. The U.S., through its controls, is inadvertently eroding the very reliability and certainty that were foundational strengths of its equipment suppliers. This creates a pivotal shift for Chinese semiconductor equipment. Previously seen largely as a "domestic replacement" option when foreign gear was unavailable, they are now being assessed as potential "contingency suppliers" by global players—even before a supply disruption occurs. This provides a crucial entry point for validation in real production lines, which is essential for iterative improvement. Chinese equipment, particularly in areas like etching, has progressed from prototypes to participating in mass production within China, gaining valuable experience. However, this does not signify full global competitiveness. Gaps remain in advanced lithography, metrology, and other key tools. The current evaluations are largely confined to foreign firms' China-based fabs, not their global procurement networks. The core change is in the decision-making framework. Efficiency-driven globalization favored single, optimal suppliers. An era of heightened geopolitical risk is forcing companies to value "replaceability." While technical prowess remains paramount, supply chain certainty is now being factored into a device's competitive equation. Ultimately, U.S. policies have not made Chinese equipment more advanced, but they have given global customers a compelling reason to start testing it. The competition has expanded: it's no longer just about who is more advanced, but also about who can be relied upon to stay.

marsbit11m ago

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

marsbit11m ago

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

Circle's Q2 performance presents a seemingly contradictory picture: the transaction volume of its stablecoin USDC surged 151% year-over-year to $14.8 trillion, while its "Total Revenue & Reserve Revenue" grew by only 7% to $701 million. This discrepancy highlights the core of Circle's business model. Revenue is primarily driven not by transaction volume, but by the average amount of USDC in circulation and the yield generated from its reserves. Key points: 1. **Revenue Drivers:** Over 90% of revenue comes from "reserve income," which is a function of average USDC circulation (up 25% YoY) and the reserve yield (which fell by 66 basis points). The net effect was a mere ~5% increase in reserve income. 2. **Transaction vs. Revenue:** High transaction volume indicates robust usage of USDC for payments and settlements, but does not translate directly to revenue. It must first convert into a sustained, average circulating balance. 3. **Cost Structure:** After accounting for distribution and other costs, the metric "Revenue Less Direct Costs" (RLDC) grew faster than total revenue, with its margin improving. However, rising operating expenses (up 23% YoY) meant that Adjusted EBITDA growth was limited to 8%. 4. **New Initiatives:** Circle reported progress on new networks like the Circle Payments Network and upcoming products (Arc, Agent Stack), but these are currently measured by adoption metrics (e.g., transaction run-rate, number of services) rather than material revenue contribution this quarter. In summary, the financial results are determined by the interplay of USDC circulation, reserve yields, and cost structures, while high transaction volume signals underlying network strength that has not yet fully flowed through to the income statement.

marsbit28m ago

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

marsbit28m ago

Samsung China, Another Step Back

Samsung China Takes Another Step Back Samsung Electronics is further retreating from the Chinese consumer market. Following the exit of its home appliance business in May, its mobile phone division is now reportedly scaling down. Stores with monthly sales below 300,000 RMB are being closed in several cities. Data shows Samsung's smartphone market share in China has plummeted to 0.1% in Q2 2026, a stark contrast to its 22% global leadership. The decline is attributed to intense competition from domestic brands offering better value, higher specs (like faster charging), and superior localization in software and services. Samsung's premium pricing and less adapted One UI system have struggled against rivals like Huawei, Xiaomi, and Honor. This consumer electronics retreat coincides with Samsung's record-breaking semiconductor profits, driven by the AI boom. In Q2 2026, the chip division contributed nearly all operating profit, while the mobile and home appliance unit posted its first-ever operating loss. Internal dynamics, like the chip division charging market prices to the mobile unit, have increased cost pressures. Samsung's strategy now appears to be a focused retreat towards the ultra-premium segment in China, similar to its global push in high-end foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold8. The company is likely to retain only key stores in major cities to serve a niche, high-end clientele. While its deep semiconductor reserves offer a cushion, this shift away from mass-market consumer electronics reduces business diversification. The move is pragmatic but signifies a fundamental transformation; Samsung is ceding mass-market influence and betting heavily on its semiconductor strength and a narrowed premium product focus.

marsbit32m ago

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.5k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

Meet ZetaChain: The Universal L1 for Apps That Work Everywhere — Even on Bitcoin

ZetaChain is the first ever Universal Blockchain to enable native connection across all blockchain ecosystems.

48.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.06.16Updated 2025.06.16

Meet ZetaChain: The Universal L1 for Apps That Work Everywhere — Even on Bitcoin

Fractal Bitcoin: Scaling Bitcoin as a Recursive System

Fractal Bitcoin is a Layer-1 scalability solution built on the Bitcoin core code, enabling infinite scalability through a recursive approach.

48.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.06.30Updated 2025.06.30

Fractal Bitcoin: Scaling Bitcoin as a Recursive System

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.