Pendle peut-il maintenir 2 dollars après que Polychain ait tiré la prise avec une perte de 4 millions de dollars ?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-14Last updated on 2025-12-14

Abstract

Depuis son rejet il y a environ 6,2 mois, Pendle (PENDLE) évolue dans une tendance baissière prononcée, atteignant un plus bas à 2,02 $. Au moment de la rédaction, le token se négociait autour de 2,17 $, en baisse de 4,1 % sur un jour et de près de 18,5 % sur un mois, reflétant une pression baissière soutenue. Cette faiblesse prolongée a poussé les détenteurs à long terme, y compris les institutions, à capituler. Polychain Capital a notamment vendu sa position après avoir détenu le token pendant plusieurs mois. La firme avait accumulé environ 4,114 millions de PENDLE entre mars et septembre à un prix moyen d'environ 3,16 $, pour un total de 13 millions de dollars. Quatre mois plus tard, elle les a vendus à environ 2,19 $, réalisant une perte estimée à 3,99 millions de dollars. Les données de Coinalyze ont montré un delta d'achat/vente négatif pendant neuf jours consécutifs, confirmant une pression de vente soutenue. L'Indice de Force Relative (RSI) est tombé à 36, proche du territoire de survente, et l'Indice Directionnel Positif a glissé à 13, soulignant une forte dynamique baissière. Si la pression vendeuse se poursuit, Pendle pourrait perdre le support clé à 2 $, ouvrant la voie vers 1,80 $. Pour que le sentiment se stabilise, le prix devrait reconquérir 2,25 $, signe d'une défense renouvelée des acheteurs.

Depuis qu'il a essuyé un rejet il y a près de 6,2 mois, Pendle a évolué dans une tendance baissière prononcée, tombant finalement à un plus bas de 2,02 dollars.

Au moment de la rédaction, Pendle s'échangeait autour de 2,17 dollars, en baisse de 4,1 % sur la journée et de près de 18,5 % sur le mois, reflétant une pression baissière soutenue.

Cette faiblesse prolongée semble avoir poussé les détenteurs à long terme, y compris les institutions, vers la capitulation.

Polychain sort avec une perte

Malgré les brèves reprises enregistrées par Pendle [PENDLE] au cours du mois écoulé, le comportement des baleines est resté constant.

Le Spot Average Order Size de CryptoQuant a montré que les Grosses Commandes de Baleines ont persisté pendant près de 30 jours consécutifs, signalant une activité soutenue des grands acteurs.

Cependant, cette activité était largement orientée vers la distribution.

Un vendeur notable était Polychain Capital, signalé par le tracker on-chain EmberCN. Selon EmberCN, Polychain Capital a liquidé sa position sur Pendle après avoir détenu le jeton pendant plusieurs mois.

La firme avait accumulé environ 4,114 millions de PENDLE entre mars et septembre à un prix moyen proche de 3,16 dollars, pour un total d'environ 13 millions de dollars.

Environ quatre mois plus tard, Polychain Capital a vendu ses avoirs pour environ 2,19 dollars, verrouillant une perte estimée à 3,99 millions de dollars.

Ce type de sortie à perte reflète souvent un changement de sentiment, où la conviction s'affaiblit sous une pression baissière prolongée.

Ce changement s'est étendu au-delà d'un seul portefeuille.

Les données de Coinalyze ont montré que Pendle a affiché un Delta Achat Vente négatif pendant neuf jours consécutifs, confirmant une pression de vente soutenue sur le spot. Des lectures de delta négatives indiquent que les ordres de vente ont systématiquement surpassé les achats, renforçant la domination baissière.

Le support des 2 dollars peut-il survivre ?

AMBCrypto a observé que la tendance baissière plus large de Pendle restait intacte alors que les vendeurs continuaient de contrôler l'action des prix. Sur le graphique journalier, l'Indice de Force Relative est tombé à 36, plaçant le jeton près du territoire de survente.

Pendant ce temps, l'Indice de Mouvement Directionnel a montré que l'Indice Directionnel Positif glissait à 13, soulignant un fort momentum baissier. Cet alignement favorise typiquement la continuation de la tendance.

Si la pression de vente persiste, Pendle pourrait perdre le niveau de support de 2 dollars, ouvrant la porte vers la zone des 1,80 dollar.

Pour que le sentiment se stabilise, le prix devrait repasser au-dessus de 2,25 dollars, signalant une défense renouvelée des acheteurs.

Un maintien soutenu au-dessus de ce niveau pourrait alors permettre une tentative de reprise vers 2,50 dollars.


Réflexions Finales

  • La sortie de Polychain Capital a marqué une rupture visible dans la conviction à long terme, mais ce n'était pas le seul signal pesant sur Pendle.
  • Des ventes au comptant soutenues et un momentum faible suggèrent une hésitation plus large parmi les acheteurs.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QQuelle a été la perte estimée subie par Polychain Capital lors de la vente de ses tokens Pendle ?

APolychain Capital a subi une perte estimée à 3,99 millions de dollars lors de la vente de ses tokens Pendle.

QÀ quel prix moyen Polychain Capital avait-il initialement acquis ses tokens Pendle ?

APolychain Capital avait acquis ses tokens Pendle à un prix moyen d'environ 3,16 dollars.

QQuel indicateur technique montrait que Pendle se trouvait près du territoire de survente ?

ALe Relative Strength Index (RSI) sur le graphique quotidien était tombé à 36, indiquant que le token se trouvait près du territoire de survente.

QQuel niveau de prix Pendle doit-il reconquérir pour signaler une stabilisation potentielle du sentiment ?

APendle doit reconquérir le niveau de prix de 2,25 dollars pour signaler une stabilisation potentielle du sentiment et une défense renouvelée des acheteurs.

QQue signifie un 'Buy Sell Delta' négatif pendant neuf jours consécutifs pour Pendle ?

AUn 'Buy Sell Delta' négatif pendant neuf jours consécutifs signifie que les ordres de vente ont constamment dépassé les ordres d'achat, confirmant une pression de vente soutenue sur le marché au comptant.

Related Reads

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit22m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit22m ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is DOGE M

Doge Matrix ($doge m): The New Breed of Community-Driven Cryptocurrency Introduction In the ever-evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, new projects constantly emerge, each aiming to capture the interest of investors and enthusiasts alike. One of the latest entrants to this domain is Doge Matrix, represented by the ticker symbol $doge m. This project has attracted attention thanks to its roots in the popular meme culture surrounding Dogecoin, establishing its place within the web3 space. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Doge Matrix, covering its overview, creator, investors, functionality, timeline, and notable aspects. What is Doge Matrix ($doge m)? Doge Matrix is a community-driven cryptocurrency project that seemingly builds upon the widespread appeal of Dogecoin, a digital currency known for its Shiba Inu mascot and its meme origins. While the overarching objectives of Doge Matrix are not extensively defined, it is characterised by a commitment to harnessing community involvement and support. Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies that often emphasise utility or intrinsic value through underlying technologies, Doge Matrix positions itself within a space that embraces the cultural phenomenon of cryptocurrencies, particularly appealing to those who resonate with the ethos of meme-based assets. Drawing on the strengths of the Dogecoin community, Doge Matrix operates as part of a broader ecosystem, inviting participation and engagement from users who share an interest in cryptocurrency and the digital landscape. Who is the Creator of Doge Matrix ($doge m)? The identity of the creator of Doge Matrix remains unknown. This lack of transparency is not an uncommon occurrence in the cryptocurrency space, where some projects are launched without revealing the identities of their founders. The absence of information regarding the founding team can raise questions among potential investors about the project’s accountability and direction. Who are the Investors of Doge Matrix ($doge m)? As it stands, there is no publicly available information detailing the investors or investment foundations that back Doge Matrix. The project appears to rely primarily on community support rather than institutional investment. This model aligns with the community-driven nature of the initiative, fostering an environment where the direction of the project is shaped by its participants rather than being dictated by a select few financial backers. How Does Doge Matrix ($doge m) Work? The specifics regarding the operational mechanisms of Doge Matrix are somewhat vague, reflecting a broader trend of projects in the meme coin space where innovative functionalities are not always clearly articulated. Nonetheless, Doge Matrix seems designed to tap into the existing cryptocurrency ecosystem by encouraging user participation while tapping into the familiar cultural references associated with Dogecoin. Its potentially unique characteristics derive from community interactions rather than technological advancements, emphasising shared experiences and collaboration among token holders. While the exact innovations have not been explicitly outlined, the project appears to create a space where community members can engage, share ideas, and propel the project's potential forward. Timeline of Doge Matrix ($doge m) Reflecting on the project’s timeline reveals notable events that have defined its journey thus far: November 25, 2024: Doge Matrix reached its all-time high value, marking a significant milestone in its early history. January 1, 2025: Conversely, Doge Matrix hit its all-time low value, illustrating the volatility often associated with cryptocurrencies, especially in the early stages of a project's lifecycle. Ongoing: The project continues to be actively traded and supported by its community, although specific future milestones or objectives have yet to be disclosed. Key Points About Doge Matrix ($doge m) Community Focus At the heart of Doge Matrix is a commitment to community engagement. The project thrives on the premise of collaboration and shared objectives among its members, emphasising the importance of collective effort. Unlike centralised projects that often have a defined leadership structure, Doge Matrix at present showcases a more fluid approach to governance, where every community member's voice matters. Volatility The cryptocurrency market is notorious for its volatility, and Doge Matrix is no exception. Its price history reflects significant fluctuations between high and low values, which is typical of many new cryptocurrencies but underscores the risks associated with investment in emerging tokens. Lack of Detailed Information One of the most striking features about Doge Matrix is the scarcity of detailed information regarding its technological underpinnings and operational mechanisms. This ambiguity necessitates that potential investors conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with the project. Conclusion In summary, Doge Matrix ($doge m) illustrates a new wave of cryptocurrency projects that lean heavily on community engagement and cultural relevance. While lacking in certain specifics—such as clear leadership, defined objectives, and detailed functionality—the project has managed to generate interest within the crypto community, leveraging the established appeal of meme culture. As with any investment in the cryptocurrency space, understanding the inherent risks and conducting comprehensive research is essential for potential participants. Doge Matrix stands as a reminder of the dynamic, sometimes unpredictable nature of the crypto industry, marked by constant evolution and enthusiasm for community-driven initiatives.

587 Total ViewsPublished 2025.02.03Updated 2025.02.03

What is DOGE M

What is $M

Understanding Mantis ($M): A New Era in Cross-Chain Interoperability In the continually evolving landscape of Web3 and cryptocurrency, new projects strive to offer innovative solutions aimed at enhancing the user experience and expanding functional possibilities within the decentralised financial ecosystem. One such project garnering attention is Mantis ($M), a pioneering protocol founded on the principles of cross-chain interoperability and intent-based settlements. This article delves into the essential aspects of Mantis, including its core functionality, creators, investment backing, innovative features, and critical milestones. What is Mantis ($M)? Mantis is described as a multi-domain intent settlement protocol that simplifies cross-chain interactions, enabling users to execute complex financial transactions across various blockchain platforms seamlessly. The protocol operates through three primary layers: Intent Expression: Users can articulate their transaction goals using natural language facilitated by the DISE LLM, an advanced AI language model. For instance, a user might express a desire to swap Ethereum (ETH) for Solana (SOL) with a specific slippage tolerance of 1%. Execution: This layer employs a network of solvers that compete to fulfil user intents. Transactions are executed using mechanisms such as Coincidence of Wants (CoWs) and Order Flow Auctions (OFAs), which ensure that user demands are met optimally. Settlement: Leveraging the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol, Mantis enables atomic cross-chain transactions, allowing users to operate across various supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. Mantis is engineered to introduce native yield generation for idle assets, employing cryptographic proofs to maintain the integrity of transactions throughout the entire process. Creators & Development Team Mantis was conceived by the Composable Foundation, a research-driven organisation notable for its emphasis on blockchain interoperability solutions. This foundation collaborates with esteemed academic institutions, including Harvard University and the University of Lisbon, contributing to extensive research and development efforts that inform Mantis's architecture and functionality. The Composable Foundation’s commitment to fostering innovation in the blockchain space positions Mantis as a robust solution for the growing demand for interoperability among multiple blockchain networks. Investors & Backing While specific details about individual investors have not been publicly disclosed, Mantis enjoys substantial backing from various entities, including: Ecosystem grants from IBC-enabled chains, which support the protocol's growth and integration within decentralised finance ecosystems. Strategic partnerships with infrastructure providers that enhance Mantis's network capabilities and deployment strategies. Funding through the Composable Foundation's treasury, ensuring sustained financial support for ongoing development and operational costs. These collaborative efforts reflect a consensus among stakeholders about the importance of enhancing cross-chain functionality and the potential utility of Mantis's infrastructural innovations. Key Innovations Mantis sets itself apart through several pioneering innovations that enhance its functionality and utility: Chain-Agnostic Intents: Users can initiate transactions from any supported chain while settling on another. This flexibility empowers users, driving increased interaction among different platforms. AI-Powered Interface: The integration of DISE LLM allows users to conduct complex DeFi operations using natural language, thereby simplifying interactions and making blockchain technology accessible to a broader audience. Cross-Domain MEV Capture: Mantis creates an internal market for maximal extractable value (MEV) through competitions among solvers. This innovative approach allows for greater efficiency and value extraction in complex transactions. Modular Settlement Layer: The protocol supports various verification methods, including zero-knowledge proofs and optimistic rollups, providing a versatile framework that can adapt to emerging blockchain technologies. Historical Timeline Mantis's development is marked by several critical milestones that chart its trajectory and growth: | Year | Milestone | |————|————————————————————————-| | 2022 | Initial concept development within the Composable Foundation's research division. | | Q3 2024 | Launch of the testnet with bridging capabilities between Solana and Ethereum. | | Q1 2025 | Anticipated Token Generation Event (TGE) alongside the mainnet launch. | | Q2 2025 | Expected integration of DISE LLM and expansion of cross-chain capabilities. | | 2025 H2 | Planned support for over 15 chains through further IBC upgrades. | This timeline outlines Mantis's evolution, from conceptual discussions to active implementation and future growth phases. Ecosystem Growth Strategy Mantis's strategy for ecosystem growth includes several initiatives designed to encourage user participation and developer engagement: Credits System: Users can earn protocol credits by providing liquidity and engaging in referral programmes. These credits are redeemable for incentives in the future, fostering a robust user community. Modular Software Development Kit (SDK): This toolkit empowers developers to create applications based on intent-driven models utilising Mantis's infrastructure, thus promoting innovation within its ecosystem. Governance Model: As the protocol matures, $M token holders will have a voice in protocol governance, allowing them to vote on proposed upgrades and changes, thereby enhancing community engagement and decentralisation. Mantis represents a significant advancement in the realm of cross-chain architecture. By seamlessly integrating advanced AI algorithms with a robust settlement framework, Mantis seeks to tackle the problems of fragmentation within multi-chain ecosystems. Its innovative approach prioritises improved user experiences while adhering to the foundational principles of decentralisation and security, setting a new standard for the future interoperability of blockchain technologies. As Mantis continues its journey of growth and implementation, it promises to be a project to watch closely in the competitive landscape of Web3 and decentralised finance. With its focus on crossing boundaries and elevating user engagement, Mantis is poised to be an integral part of the future developments in the cryptocurrency space.

101 Total ViewsPublished 2025.03.18Updated 2025.03.18

What is $M

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of M (M) are presented below.

活动图片