Merlin Chain surges – Is a MERL pullback next after $75M OI peak?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-13Last updated on 2025-12-13

Abstract

Merlin Chain (MERL), a Bitcoin layer-2 solution, surged 16% amid increased on-chain activity, reaching a new all-time high in Open Interest at $75.79 million. This reflects strong bullish sentiment, with a taker Buy/Sell Ratio of 1.05 indicating dominant buying pressure. Spot market accumulation and exchange outflows further support the upward trend. However, the liquidation heatmap suggests potential downside risk, as unfilled liquidity clusters below current levels could trigger a short-term pullback. Despite the bullish momentum, recent buying hasn't fully offset prior selling pressure, leaving some risk of volatility.

Merlin Chain [MERL], the Bitcoin [BTC] layer-2 solution, has recorded a notable increase in on-chain activity over the past day, even as Bitcoin’s price remains largely range-bound.

The asset rallied sharply, gaining 16%, at press time, while the number of token holders climbed to 173,800. Although performance appears decisively bullish, signs of a potential price pullback still loom within the broader market structure.

Liquidity boom lifts price

The recent surge in MERL price can be largely attributed to a sharp liquidity inflow across the derivatives market.

MERL perpetual Open Interest (OI), a metric that reflects the total value of outstanding derivative contracts and overall market liquidity, has climbed to a new all-time high of $75.79 million, as of writing.

Notably, this spike highlights the bullish sentiment currently circulating in the market. OI reached this level after expanding by approximately $27 million within a single day.

Such a large one-day inflow typically includes positions from both long and short traders. In this instance, trading data indicates that long positions dominate market activity.

Trading volume has also turned decisively positive, with the taker Buy/Sell Ratio reaching 1.05. This reading suggests that taker buy orders are leading cumulative volume, reinforcing short-term bullish pressure.

Spot investors step in

Spot market participants have also continued to accumulate MERL, helping to restrict available supply.

In context, exchange outflows remain relatively modest, with roughly $700,000 worth of MERL withdrawn from centralized platforms over the past day.

On its own, this level of outflow does not strongly confirm a bullish market structure, as the amount remains comparatively small.

However, sustained accumulation alongside consistent net outflows increases the likelihood that MERL maintains its upward trajectory, as bullish investors view current levels as an attractive entry point.

Notably, the accumulation/distribution indicator has ticked higher, pointing to stronger buying pressure relative to selling. That said, the indicator remains in negative territory.

This negative reading suggests that recent buying has yet to fully offset the heavier selling pressure observed over the past week, which contributed to the prior decline.

Risk of a pullback?

Despite recent gains, MERL still shows downside risk, as indicated by the liquidation heatmap.

This tool highlights liquidity concentrations above and below the current price to signal potential moves. Liquidity positioned above often draws prices upward, while clusters below suggest possible declines as the market moves to fill those levels.

Currently, MERL’s rally has pushed the price higher, clearing major liquidity zones above. As a result, most liquidity clusters now sit below the current trading range.

Based on classical market behaviour, this setup increases the possibility of a short-term pullback. However, such outcomes are not guaranteed.

One key exception emerges when bullish momentum continues to strengthen, allowing price to defy typical liquidity-driven retracements.


Final Thoughts

  • MERL has recorded a massive liquidity inflow from the derivatives market, while spot investors continue to accumulate.
  • The liquidation heatmap shows a likelihood of price volatility, with unfilled liquidity clusters sitting below current levels.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit36m ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit36m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy MERL

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Merlin chain (MERL) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Merlin chain (MERL) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Merlin chain (MERL)After purchasing your Merlin chain (MERL), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Merlin chain (MERL)Easily trade Merlin chain (MERL) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.19Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy MERL

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MERL (MERL) are presented below.

活动图片