Merlin Chain 暴涨——在7500万美元未平仓合约峰值后,MERL会回调吗?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-13Last updated on 2025-12-13

Abstract

梅林链(MERL)作为比特币二层解决方案,近期链上活动显著增加,尽管比特币价格波动有限。MERL价格上涨16%,持币地址数增至17.38万,永续合约未平仓头寸(OI)达到7579万美元的历史新高,单日增长约2700万美元,市场流动性大幅提升。多头情绪主导,交易量比率显示买盘占优。 现货市场持续积累MERL,交易所流出量虽不大(单日约70万美元),但配合资金净流出表明投资者看好当前入场机会。累积/分配指标虽仍为负值,但已回升,显示买压增强,尚未完全抵消上周的卖压。 尽管行情看涨,清算热图提示下行风险:当前价格下方存在未填充流动性区域,可能引发短期回调。但若看涨动量持续,价格或突破常规流动性回撤趋势。

Merlin Chain [MERL] 作为比特币 [BTC] 的第二层解决方案,尽管比特币价格基本保持区间波动,但在过去一天内其链上活动显著增加。

截至发稿时,该资产价格大幅上涨16%,同时代币持有者数量攀升至173,800人。尽管表现明显看涨,但在更广泛的市场结构中,潜在价格回调的迹象仍然隐约可见。

流动性激增推高价格

MERL价格的近期飙升主要归因于衍生品市场的流动性急剧流入。

截至撰写本文时,MERL永续合约未平仓合约(OI)——一个反映未平仓衍生品合约总价值和整体市场流动性的指标——已攀升至7579万美元的历史新高。

值得注意的是,这一飙升突显了当前市场弥漫的看涨情绪。OI在一天内扩大了约2700万美元后达到这一水平。

如此大规模的单日流入通常包括多头和空头交易者的头寸。在这种情况下,交易数据表明多头头寸主导了市场活动。

交易量也明显转为正值,Taker买卖比率达到1.05。该读数表明Taker买单主导了累计交易量,增强了短期看涨压力。

现货投资者入场

现货市场参与者也在继续积累MERL,这有助于限制可用供应。

具体来看,交易所流出量相对温和,过去一天从中心化平台撤出了约70万美元的MERL。

单就这一水平而言,这种流出量并不能有力确认看涨的市场结构,因为其金额仍然相对较小。

然而,持续的积累加上稳定的净流出增加了MERL维持上升轨迹的可能性,因为看涨的投资者将当前水平视为有吸引力的入场点。

值得注意的是,积累/分布指标已小幅上升,表明相对于卖出压力,买入压力更强。尽管如此,该指标仍处于负值区域。

这一负值读数表明,近期的买入尚未完全抵消过去一周观察到的更沉重的卖出压力,而该压力导致了先前的下跌。

回调风险?

尽管近期有所上涨,但MERL仍显示出下行风险,正如清算热力图所指示的那样。

该工具突出显示当前价格上方和下方的流动性集中区域,以预示潜在的价格变动。上方的流动性通常会吸引价格上涨,而下方的集群则表明随着市场填补这些水平,价格可能出现下跌。

目前,MERL的上涨已将价格推高,清除了上方的重大流动性区域。因此,大多数流动性集群现在位于当前交易区间下方。

基于经典的市场行为,这种设置增加了短期回调的可能性。然而,这种结果并非必然发生。

一个关键的例外情况是,当看涨势头持续增强时,价格可能会违背典型的流动性驱动的回撤。


最终思考

  • MERL从衍生品市场录得大量流动性流入,同时现货投资者继续积累。
  • 清算热力图显示价格波动可能性很大,未填补的流动性集群位于当前水平下方。

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QMerlin Chain (MERL) 的价格在过去一天内上涨了多少?

AMerlin Chain (MERL) 的价格在过去一天内上涨了16%。

Q推动 MERL 近期上涨的主要因素是什么?

A推动 MERL 近期上涨的主要因素是衍生品市场的大量流动性流入,其永续合约未平仓合约(OI)达到了7579万美元的历史新高。

Q根据文章,MERL 的清算热力图显示了什么风险?

A清算热力图显示,当前价格下方存在未填充的流动性集群,这增加了价格出现短期回调的可能性。

Q目前 MERL 的持币地址数量达到了多少?

A目前 MERL 的持币地址数量已攀升至173,800个。

Q文章中提到,什么指标表明买入订单在主导市场活动?

ATaker Buy/Sell Ratio(吃单买入/卖出比率)达到了1.05,这表明吃单买入订单正在主导累计交易量,加强了短期的看涨压力。

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy MERL

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Merlin chain (MERL) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Merlin chain (MERL) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Merlin chain (MERL)After purchasing your Merlin chain (MERL), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Merlin chain (MERL)Easily trade Merlin chain (MERL) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.19Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy MERL

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MERL (MERL) are presented below.

活动图片