SOL反弹冲140遇阻、33成关键支撑、破145才能开启新行情？

金色财经Published on 2025-11-26Last updated on 2025-11-26

Solana最近的反弹势头有点意思！在135美元上方掀起一波反弹后，现在价格进入盘整，眼看要摸到140美元区间，却遇到了阻力卡壳了——这走势和比特币、以太坊还挺像。

先看技术面：斐波回撤+趋势线给的信号

市场之前从145美元的高点跌到121美元低点，现在刚好回弹到这个下跌波段的61.8%斐波回撤位附近。而且小时图上还有条看涨趋势线，支撑位就在133美元。目前SOL稳稳站在134美元以上，还超过了100小时简单移动平均线，短期基础算扎实。

上行空间：140是坎，145是关键

往上走的话，第一个直接阻力就是140美元——这也是从145美元到121美元下跌波段的76.4%斐波回撤位。过了140，下一个阻力是142美元，再往上就是145美元的主要阻力位。

划重点：要是能稳稳收盘突破145美元这个阻力区，那可能就为新一轮稳步上涨铺好路了，接下来能看155美元，再涨甚至能摸到162美元。vVXUPa2SO3MnLl7jhDnwtyZaa3WVdzHKdu1EjLJA.png

下行风险：133是第一道防线

要是冲不过140美元阻力，那SOL可能就得回调了。下行的第一道支撑就是133美元区间和那条趋势线；再往下，第一个主要支撑在128美元附近；要是连128都跌破了，价格可能会跌到122美元支撑区；要是收盘价也跌破122，那近期说不定要探到115美元区间。

技术指标亮绿灯还是黄灯？

- 小时MACD：SOL/USD的MACD还在多头区块里，但涨势有点减速了，得留意动能变化。

- 小时RSI：相对强弱指数在50以上，说明短期多头还占点优势。

总结一下关键点位

主要支撑位：133美元、128美元 主要阻力位：140美元、145美元

接下来就看140美元能不能啃下来，以及133美元支撑稳不稳，这俩点位定短期方向~

Related Reads

Ethereum weakens as U.S. investors remain bearish: Will ETH fall below $2K?

Ethereum's price declined amid broader crypto market volatility, dropping from $2171 to a low of $2087 and trading at $2100 at press time, down 1.6% daily. This fall below the 50-day EMA indicates a bearish short-to-mid-term trend shift. A significant whale moved 60,001 ETH ($128.8M) to Coinbase, raising concerns about potential selling pressure. U.S. investor sentiment remains bearish, reflected in a negative Coinbase Premium Gap for 16 of the last 30 days. However, whale accumulation is noted at the $2.1K support level. Technical indicators show weak upside momentum, with ETH likely to range between $2100 and $2300. A breakdown could push prices toward $1980 if demand weakens further.

ambcrypto34m ago

Ethereum weakens as U.S. investors remain bearish: Will ETH fall below $2K?

ambcrypto34m ago

The Overestimated Individual: A Survival Guide to China's 'One-Person Companies'

The article "The Overestimated Individual: A Survival Guide to China's 'One-Person Companies'" explores the rise and challenges of solo entrepreneurship in China. It contrasts viral success stories, like Maor Shlomo's $80M exit and Pieter Levels' $2.7M annual revenue, with the harsh reality for most Chinese OPC founders. Based on a community of 2,500+ solo founders, only 20% achieve a sustainable business, with an annual revenue ceiling of ~¥1.2M due to the constraints of trading time for money. Most successful founders don’t stick to their original industry but instead identify unmet market needs. Breaking through the ceiling is extremely difficult. While AI and automation are often touted as solutions, they are hard to implement effectively due to complex delivery chains and the risk of quality degradation. Alternative paths include forming collaborative networks with other solo founders or scaling by handing off validated business models to a team. The author concludes that the window of opportunity for OPCs is temporary. Lower barriers to entry mean markets get crowded faster, shortening the "shelf life" of an idea. A one-person company is not a sustainable end state but a precarious, time-sensitive phase to validate a idea before the competition catches up or the market window closes.

marsbit48m ago

The Overestimated Individual: A Survival Guide to China's 'One-Person Companies'

marsbit48m ago

Chinese Large Models: This Time, the Script Is Different

By early 2026, Chinese large language models (LLMs) have gained significant global traction, representing six of the top ten most-used on the AI model aggregation platform OpenRouter. This shift, led by models like Xiaomi's MiMo-V2-Pro, occurred after Chinese models' weekly token usage surpassed that of U.S. models in February 2026. A key driver is the substantial price gap: Chinese models are often 10–20 times cheaper for input and up to 60 times cheaper for output tokens than leading U.S. models like OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 and Anthropic’s Claude Opus. This cost advantage became critical with the rise of agentic applications like OpenClaw, which automate complex tasks (e.g., programming, testing) and consume tokens at a much higher volume than traditional chat interfaces. While U.S. models still lead in complex reasoning benchmarks, Chinese models have nearly closed the gap in programming tasks—evidenced by near-parity scores on the SWE-Bench coding evaluation. This enabled cost-conscious developers, especially in AI startups using open-source stacks, to adopt a "layered" approach: using Chinese models for routine tasks and reserving premium U.S. models for harder problems. Rising demand led Chinese firms like Zhipu and Tencent to increase API prices in early 2026, yet usage continued growing sharply. Analysts note that China’s cost edge stems from large-scale, efficient compute infrastructure and widespread adoption of MoE (Mixture of Experts) architecture. Unlike the low-margin electronics manufacturing analogy ("AI-era Foxconn"), Chinese LLM firms are demonstrating pricing power and rapid technical advancement, suggesting a different trajectory from traditional assembly-line roles.

marsbit50m ago

Chinese Large Models: This Time, the Script Is Different

marsbit50m ago

Strategy’s latest 4.8K BTC purchase – 3 reasons why it’s buying Bitcoin dip

Strategy continues its Bitcoin accumulation strategy despite market consolidation, purchasing 4,871 BTC (worth $330 million) to bring its total holdings to 766,970 BTC. This move accounted for 94% of all corporate BTC purchases in March. Unlike many firms, Strategy buys during price weakness rather than breakouts, signaling long-term conviction but limited short-term upside expectations. Funding for these purchases comes primarily from equity raises rather than debt), providing flexibility and avoiding forced selling risks. The recent acquisition was supported by a $473.9 million equity raise, leaving the company with a $2.25 billion cash buffer. This approach allows continued buying during downturns but introduces gradual shareholder dilution. While demonstrating strong belief in Bitcoin’s future, Strategy’s retained cash and measured accumulation reflect a cautious stance amid ongoing market uncertainty and unconfirmed price structure.

ambcrypto59m ago

Strategy’s latest 4.8K BTC purchase – 3 reasons why it’s buying Bitcoin dip

ambcrypto59m ago

The Real Quantum Threat to Bitcoin: 99% of People Get It Wrong

Quantum Computing's Real Threat to Bitcoin: 99% Misunderstand The article clarifies widespread misconceptions about quantum computing's threat to Bitcoin. Key points: - Bitcoin uses digital signatures, not encryption, making "collect now, decrypt later" attacks irrelevant. - Quantum computers cannot crack Bitcoin mining (requires energy exceeding the sun's output) but threaten signatures via Shor's algorithm. - Only ~6.26M BTC (30-35% of supply) are at risk due to exposed public keys (legacy P2PK, reused addresses). Modern unused addresses remain safe. - Media exaggerations (e.g., "9-minute break") misrepresent research; actual quantum attacks require non-existent hardware and are likely decades away. - Bitcoin can upgrade (BIP-360 proposes post-quantum signatures), but the community must accelerate efforts (estimated 7-year timeline). - The real urgency stems from classical cryptographic risks (e.g., mathematical breakthroughs breaking secp256k1), not just quantum threats. - Recommendations: avoid address reuse, monitor BIP-360, migrate to quantum-resistant addresses when available, and ignore sensationalized headlines. Conclusion: The threat is real but distant. Panic is unwarranted, but complacency is dangerous. Proactive engineering is essential.

marsbit1h ago

The Real Quantum Threat to Bitcoin: 99% of People Get It Wrong

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions