15分钟130万美元,永赚的永远是他们

比推Published on 2025-11-21Last updated on 2025-11-21

在比特币跌破 8.2 万美元、市场风险偏好极速降温的这周,Base 生态迎来一场不算热闹却充满争议的实验。

Base 负责人 Jesse Pollak 推出了以自己名字命名的创作者代币$jesse,意在探索“创作者经济是否可以在链上形成新的价值机制”。

1763762928538.jpg

然而,市场上讨论的热度依然来自熟悉的身影:两台链上狙击机器人率先完成了建仓与抛售的全过程。

JESSE 的初衷:把“个人品牌价值”变成可被共同持有的资产

这并非Pollak首次因发币引发争议。自2025年4月起,他就在个人及Base官方Zora账户上持续进行“内容币”实验:

2025年4月17日:Base官方账号发布“Base is for everyone”推文并被自动铸造为$BASE代币,市值在两小时内从1690万美元暴跌至130万美元,跌幅达92%。Pollak事后承认亲自批准该贴文,称其为“实验”,但仍引发市场操纵质疑。

他后续将日常推文批量铸造成币。据统计,其铸造的内容币中40%跌幅超过90%,仅3个实现增值。

与此同时,Pollak 一直在 Zora 上推动“内容币—创作者币”的概念。他试图回答一个问题:

创作者的影响力、注意力和作品,能否在链上形成一种更直接、更持久的价值流通?

他的逻辑是:

  • 创作者能够将自己的“品牌”代币化;

  • 粉丝通过持有代币成为某种意义上的“利益共同体”;

  • 创作者反过来能利用收益支持更多创作,形成飞轮。

按 Pollak 本人的说法,$jesse是“文化实验”,不是投资品。这听上去更接近一场艺术装置或社会学测试,而不是投机活动。

但链上的交易机制不以愿景为转移。实验一落地,就进入了一个远比设计者更精密、更激进的系统。

狙击机器人 15 分钟赚走 130 万美元

JESSE 的发行方式采用了“流动性一次性注入”的模式:

  • 总供应量 10 亿枚;

  • 其中 5 亿枚直接注入流动性池;

  • 但在注入的那个区块内,2.6 亿枚被两名狙击者瞬间扫走。

根据 Arkham Intelligence 数据,这两名狙击者最终分别获利:

  • $707,700

  • $619,600

合计超过 130万美金。

image.png

其中一个钱包的操作尤为典型:

  • 花费约 67 ETH(19.1 万美元)买入 7.6% 的供应量;

  • 支付了超过 $44,000 的 priority fee 购买排序优势;

  • 在短线冲高后全部卖出,将 67 ETH 迅速增值到 303 ETH,
    几分钟内获利超过 60万美金。

image.png

这是一种“抢跑即胜利”的结构:
普通用户看到价格图的那一刻,利润已经被抽走了。

这一操作的核心在于 Base 在 7 月上线的 flashblocks 机制。

名义上,Base 每两秒出一个区块;但在内部,这两秒又被拆分成多个 200 毫秒级的微区块。谁能抢到第一个微区块,谁就几乎掌握了“无风险套利”的先手。

在这种结构下,狙击不再是技术博弈,而是一场围绕“速度+费用”的竞争。机器人提前监听合约,一旦检测到流动性注入便即时下单;交易绕过公共 mempool,通过私有通道直送 sequencer;最后再用高额 priority fee 抢占排序。200 毫秒的差距,就足以决定几十万美元的收益,而普通用户这时连价格图都还没加载完成。

因此,JESSE 的走势从第一秒就被锁死:快速冲高、随后在狙击者出货后迅速回落三成以上。

这是 flashblocks 结构带来的天然倾斜——抢跑者拥有绝对优势,普通参与者则被排除在利润区间之外。

社区用户尖锐指出:项目方JESSE 上线第一分钟就关闭了网站上的个人资料获取接口(这可能是为了阻止机器人自动抓取信息)。但这个措施可能起了反作用:普通用户需要靠这个接口从官网获取合约地址才能购买,而高级狙击手直接在智能合约层面进行操作,根本不需要通过网站前端。结果就是,这个措施只妨碍了普通用户,反而为狙击手减少了竞争。

image.png

今年早些时候,Zora 铸造的 BASE 代币也曾在上线数分钟内从高点暴跌 90%。如今 JESSE 再次被狙击,难免让人怀疑:创作者代币的实验,还能否真正跑出套利机器的阴影?

截止撰稿时,JESSE代币过去24小时内价格下跌32.24%,总市值回落至1422万美元,24小时交易量478万美元,交易量与市值的比值高达33.6%。这一比例显著高于正常水平,表明市场投机氛围浓厚,资金以短线交易为主。

image.png

熊市中的 SocialFi

把 JESSE 放入更大的叙事框架里,会看到 SocialFi 赛道在熊市中正出现明显分化。创作者币更像注意力期权,难以形成长期价值沉淀。

典型案例就是已经落寞的 Friend.tech ;其他个人 IP 型代币也面临类似困境:它们的价值更多依赖热点与情绪,一旦链上活跃度下降,买盘几乎立即枯竭。

反而是基础设施正在获得更多“耐性资金”。

Zora 的平台代币 ZORA,在 Base App 接入深度提升后迎来强劲增长——创作者数量、铸币量、总交易额同步攀升。

这标志着市场正在挤出情绪泡沫,价值判断从追逐个人的“注意力资产”,回归到看重可规模化的“实用工具”。JESSE的困境正在于此:依赖热度的创作者代币天生脆弱,因为市场的“承接力”永远无法靠短暂的炒作来维系。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手53m ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手53m ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbit1h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbit1h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News2h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News2h ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbit2h ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

720 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片