11月18日:熊市指南 BTC、ETH、SOL、XPL、TAO 、LTC行情分析

金色财经Published on 2025-11-19Last updated on 2025-11-19

比特币昨晚继续跟随美股下跌,贝莱德背后的投资者持续抛售比特币,目前还没有丝毫止跌迹象,这背后可能有散户不知道的真相,也许等大家都知道什么原因跌的时候,行情才会止跌反弹拉升。 

比特币暴跌之际,山寨已经不跟风了,反而部分山寨一路飞扬,这又是另一个信号,大盘已经影响不了一些优质山寨走势。  这几天就看比特币什么时候止跌,等止跌了,山寨拉升会更加猛烈。

BTC

BTC90000上方的强压力位93300-94000,所以在没有站稳92000前不能追涨,短线上只能91400-89666低吸。多头的防守89000。日线以内反抽的最大压力在94800附近。未来当88000跌破,下方继续再下跌10000点的空间又将打开。  

图片

从中长线上看,btc空头的大趋势是雷打不动的,这个一定要非常明确。空头的趋势反转,构成的唯一条件是日线级别的连续性反抽,而目前都属于小时级别反抽,最大级别的反抽就是12小时,所以基本就已经提前确定了反弹的天花板。

ETH

ETH在2970触底形成W双底反弹,ETH处于上升三角,3097支撑趋势线共振,以太坊RSI15分钟和1H线触发超卖, 3000是个重要心理关口,且有放量阳线承接,应该没那么容易破 ,开了个短多,止损打到1%!

图片

SOL

SOL142是接近日线EMA7的位置,所以是小时级别反抽的最大压力,137.25-136.25是个支撑。短空单可以止盈一部分,多单反弹到137.5-139.5即可止盈,140-142的鱼尾可以不吃。下一个抄底点:130二次跌破后再抄底的点位就是125.65。误差不超过1个点。

图片

XPL 

XPL 自高位急跌后出现明显的“跌不动”形态。近期已突破小级别的市场框架左侧高点,若后续收稳,则目标区域看向 0.31–0.32 美元。关键在于确认是否假突破,只要不再创新低,则反弹结构可延续。

图片

TAO

TAO在 539 高点回落后持续位于均线下方,但下方箱体属于明显的大级别震荡区。近期强势日线收复至关键区间,若能站稳 Vega 通道上方,则中期有望冲击 400区域。

图片

LTC

LTC目前均线高度缠绕,与ZEC起涨前的形态极为接近,而且LTC是在 BTC接连下跌的基础上。  这表明了LTC多头的强势,若能连续两根强势日线突破下降趋势线,则可能迎来更大级别反弹。短线关键在于收复 98 美元,若突破并站稳,则市场框架将明显转多。

图片

“熊市生存手册”

1. 不碰任何没流动性的资产,就算它现在看起来再怎么蓝筹。

熊市没有任何流动性的时候,这些资产有人卖一点价格就砸下去,甚至到后面你都卖不出去,而且一年内没人知道会发生什么

2. 山寨币一点都不要买,就算它再蓝筹,千万不要幻想着“够低了。

熊市买山寨本身就是一件巨愚蠢的事情,因为脚斩的不只是币价的流动性,还有所有crypto公司的业务收入,可能现在看起来很solid的业务,到了熊市就是一滩没人用的垃圾,因为很多公司的业务模式只在有充足的流动性下才成立。

3. 千万不要把钱放在小所里!!!

4. 熊市的思路要完全转变,你现在要每天想的是你能空点什么,而不是什么跌到位了,我今天该买点什么,熊市大部分币是没有底的。

5. 尽量不参与打钱局和新协议的理财局,除非你对项目有很强的信息和信心。

6.熊市最常见的死法就是合约。我不反对玩合约,但不要开高于一两倍的杠杆,熊市是典型的震荡行情,你在未来一年会看到特别多画门和插针,你杠杆稍高一点,画几次门就死了。

7. 熊市比的是耐心,长期仓位不要着急建,别套住了就洗脑自己“我持有的是btc、eth,长期一定能赚的”。

8. 未来一年你只有一个任务:活下来,留在牌桌上。

Image航情瞬息

每一波暴跌后迎来的都是星辰大海,对后续行情布局相当迷茫的可以关注甜梦,交硫葳:RFGH8689

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is PLASMA

Plasma: A Cutting-Edge Solution for Blockchain Scalability Introduction to Plasma As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, there is an increasing need for enhanced efficiency within blockchain networks. Plasma, a Layer 2 scaling solution, emerges as a pioneering player in this area, particularly in the sphere of Web3 development. By strategically shifting a significant portion of tasks from the main chain to a series of smaller chains, Plasma aims to significantly enhance the scalability and performance of Ethereum—a widely-used blockchain platform that is at the forefront of decentralised applications. What is Plasma? Plasma is an innovative off-chain scaling solution specifically designed for the Ethereum blockchain. It was introduced in August 2017 by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Joseph Poon, a prominent advocate of scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Plasma serves as a framework that enables the creation of scalable applications by establishing a hierarchical structure of child chains that sit above the main Ethereum chain. At its core, Plasma facilitates the development of potentially unlimited side chains that can operate independently while still relying on the Ethereum network for security and consensus. This architecture is supported by smart contracts and Merkle Trees, which efficiently manage transactions and data storage. Core Objectives of Plasma The primary goal of Plasma is to increase the throughput of the Ethereum network. By diverting a significant volume of transactions away from the congested main chain, Plasma's architecture offers higher transaction speeds, more efficient data processing, and lower transaction costs. This is particularly crucial in an age where the demand for decentralised applications—especially in finance, gaming, and supply chain management—is reaching unprecedented levels. Creator of Plasma Plasma is the brainchild of two renowned figures in the blockchain community: Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon. Buterin is celebrated primarily for co-founding Ethereum and pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve. Poon, on the other hand, is known for advocating scalable solutions that enable faster and more cost-effective transactions on blockchain networks. Their collaboration on the Plasma framework has significantly contributed to its innovative nature, merging advanced technical insights with practical applications. Investors of Plasma While the specific investment foundations or organisations supporting Plasma remain undisclosed, the project has attracted interest from various prominent figures and players in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. With its potential for enhancing scalability within Ethereum, it has captured the attention of various entities aiming to push the boundaries of blockchain technology. How Does Plasma Work? Plasma's unique functionality stems from its architectural framework that relies on child chains and their interaction with the main Ethereum network. Below are some key factors that contribute to Plasma's innovative approach: Child Chains: Plasma establishes numerous child chains that can execute transactions independently of the main Ethereum chain. Each child chain operates as a separate smart contract with unique features, allowing developers to create tailored solutions based on their specific requirements. Smart Contracts and Merkle Trees: The framework utilises smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements with predefined conditions, combined with Merkle Trees that enable efficient verification of data. This technology allows Plasma to achieve both high scalability and security. Transaction Compression: By batching transactions on the child chains, Plasma reduces the data load on the Ethereum network. This implies that fewer transactions need to be recorded on the main chain—thereby freeing up space and alleviating congestion. Enhanced Security: Despite being off-chain, Plasma leverages the security measures of the main Ethereum network, ensuring that all transactions on child chains maintain a high level of integrity and security. Timeline of Plasma Understanding the development of Plasma involves tracing its significant milestones: August 2017: Plasma was first introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon as a scalable solution to address Ethereum's performance challenges. 2018: The Plasma framework was officially developed and made available on GitHub, marking a crucial step towards its implementation in practical applications. 2019: As awareness about Plasma grew, it began to attract developers interested in scaling Ethereum applications, thus increasing its adoption. 2020: Plasma continued evolving, with substantial enhancements made to its architecture and functionality—making it even more appealing to developers. Key Features of Plasma Plasma boasts several characteristics that position it as a transformative solution in the blockchain space: Scalability: By creating multiple child chains, Plasma can handle a higher volume of transactions without placing further strain on the main Ethereum chain. Speed: Each child chain can process transactions more rapidly, providing users with a better experience and service. Lower Transaction Costs: Plasma's structure effectively reduces the costs associated with transactions by minimising the burden on the main chain. Interoperability: The architecture allows Plasma to seamlessly interact with multiple blockchains, enhancing cross-network functionality. Security: By harnessing the security of Ethereum’s main chain, Plasma ensures the integrity of its operations while using its child chains. Use Cases for Plasma The innovative architecture of Plasma opens the door for various practical applications across different sectors: Decentralised Finance (DeFi): Plasma has the capacity to enhance the scalability and efficiency of DeFi applications, creating smoother and more effective trading processes. Gaming: The framework facilitates the development of quick and cost-efficient gaming experiences, making it appealing to developers in the gaming industry. Supply Chain Management: With the ability to achieve efficient transaction processing, Plasma can promote the development of decentralised supply chain management solutions. Conclusion Plasma stands at the forefront of blockchain technology, positioned as a pivotal Layer 2 scaling solution aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Ethereum network and beyond. Through its unique structure of child chains, smart contracts, and Merkle Trees, Plasma presents a compelling solution to the scalability crisis that has long plagued blockchain networks. As blockchain technology continues to advance, solutions like Plasma promise to reshape how developers approach scalability challenges, potentially revolutionising how decentralised applications function. The ongoing efforts by its creators and the interest of various stakeholders indicate a bright future for Plasma as it seeks to elevate blockchain capabilities to new heights in the digital realm.

187 Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.03Updated 2024.12.03

What is PLASMA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XPL (XPL) are presented below.

活动图片