Deutsche Bank заявил об опасном разрыве между рынками акций и кредитов в США

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-07-13Last updated on 2025-11-14

  • Банк фиксирует расхождение в оценках рисков между фондовым и кредитным рынками.
  • Ожидается расширение кредитных спредов и рост дефолтов до середины 2026 года.
  • Инвесторам рекомендуют готовиться к повышенной волатильности и пересмотру стратегий.

Рынки акций и кредита больше не движутся синхронно, что вызывает обеспокоенность Deutsche Bank. Аналитики отмечают, что оптимизм на фондовом рынке контрастирует с более жесткими условиями на кредитном, где инвесторы закладывают повышенные риски и ухудшение экономической конъюнктуры.

По словам банка, текущая ситуация отражает нарастающий разрыв между оценкой рисков в двух секторах. Эксперты уверены, что подобное положение дел нельзя считать устойчивым в долгосрочной перспективе.

В отчете подчеркивается, что на дисбаланс повлияли:

  • рост маржинальной задолженности;
  • высокая стоимость заимствований;
  • сохраняющаяся инфляция;
  • геополитическая неопределенность.

На этом фоне рынок облигаций сигнализирует о возможных проблемах в корпоративном секторе, подчеркнули аналитики. При это акции, в первую очередь технологических компаний, продолжают торговаться на повышенных оценках.

Разрыв между рынками усиливается

По оценке Deutsche Bank, кредитный рынок в ближайшие 12 месяцев может столкнуться с расширением спредов высокодоходных облигаций США на 80–120 б.п. и ростом дефолтов до 4,8% к середине 2026 года.

Это противоречит динамике на рынке акций, где сохраняется уверенность в устойчивом росте корпоративных доходов. Дополнительным фактором риска называют рост просрочек по потребительскому кредитованию, включая карты, студенческие займы и автокредиты.

Особенно уязвимы компании со значительной долговой нагрузкой, эмитенты со спекулятивными рейтингами и бизнесы, зависящие от рынка высокодоходных облигаций, говорится в отчете.

Как отмечают представители банка, удорожание капитала может привести к сокращению инвестиций и усложнить рефинансирование. В выигрыше остаются компании с устойчивой ликвидностью, предсказуемыми денежными потоками и минимальной зависимостью от внешнего финансирования.

Последствия и сценарии развития

Deutsche Bank указывает, что расхождение между рынками может привести к неожиданным корректировкам и ошибочному распределению капитала. При неблагоприятном развитии событий возможен рост потерь у банков и фондов, снижение кредитной активности и давление на корпоративные балансы.

Регуляторы уже отслеживают ситуацию, отметили эксперты. В случае усиления стресса могут потребоваться меры для стабилизации ликвидности, ужесточения кредитных стандартов и контроля рисков.

Исторические параллели — от пузыря доткомов до кризиса 2008 года — служат напоминанием о последствиях недооценки риска, уверены в Deutsche Bank.

Ближайшие месяцы, по оценке аналитиков, могут пройти в условиях повышенной волатильности. Это особенно актуально для высокооцененных акций и компаний с крупными обязательствами.

«Это расхождение представляет собой серьезную угрозу финансовой стабильности», — сказано в отчете.

Далее возможны три сценария, заявили аналитики. Речь идет о мягкой корректировке и постепенном выравнивании оценок, резком спаде при усилении кредитного давления или затяжном периоде разнонаправленной динамики без четкого тренда.

Ключевые индикаторы, за которыми предлагают следить:

  • траектория процентных ставок и сигналы ФРС;
  • показатели дефолтов и просрочек;
  • способность компаний рефинансировать долги;
  • спрос на высокодоходные облигации;
  • геополитические события и их влияние на инфляцию.

В заключении Deutsche Bank отмечает, что рынок вступает в период, когда фундаментальная устойчивость компаний и качество их балансов будут играть ключевую роль.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Manufacturing's Share Drops Below 25%: Is Hangzhou Unconcerned?

Hangzhou is entering a critical phase of industrial restructuring. While its manufacturing-to-GDP ratio has fallen below 25%, the city is not alarmed. Instead, it is strategically navigating a dual focus: advancing advanced manufacturing and expanding its service sector, particularly producer services. Recently, the city celebrated the IPO of a humanoid robotics company, seen as a milestone in moving beyond its e-commerce era. Simultaneously, it set an ambitious target for its service sector: to exceed 2 trillion yuan in value by 2030, with producer services making up over 60%. Data shows a clear trend: the service sector's share of GDP has risen to 75.3%, while manufacturing's share has declined to around 20.1%. This shift revives the debate on whether a strong service sector weakens a city's manufacturing "foundation." Hangzhou's approach challenges the notion of a fixed manufacturing "red line" near 25%. The city argues that the quality and integration of industries matter more than simple ratios. Its strategy is "using software to drive hardware," leveraging its core strengths in digital economy and producer services—like R&D, software, and supply chain management—to empower and add value to manufacturing. This is embodied by its emerging "AI era" companies, whose innovation in Hangzhou feeds into national industrial chains. The city believes that for a hub like Hangzhou, the key is not merely boosting visible manufacturing output, but strengthening the "invisible" competitive edge provided by high-end producer services, which ultimately determine manufacturing profitability. National policy is also shifting from insisting on a "stable" manufacturing share to acknowledging a "reasonable" range, allowing for quality-focused development. Hangzhou's future industrial blueprint aims for a manufacturing share above 22% of GDP by 2027, coupled with a dominant, high-value service sector. The goal is not to choose between manufacturing and services, but to deeply integrate them, using advanced services as the accelerator for next-generation manufacturing.

marsbit25m ago

Manufacturing's Share Drops Below 25%: Is Hangzhou Unconcerned?

marsbit25m ago

SEC Suddenly Proposes "Regulation Crypto": U.S. Token Fundraising May Become Legal Again

On August 18, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a landmark set of permanent rules, "Regulation Crypto Assets," specifically designed for crypto asset investment contracts. The 402-page proposal introduces two registration exemption paths and a groundbreaking safe harbor mechanism, representing the SEC's first dedicated crypto-specific regulatory framework. Two exemption tiers are proposed: a "Startup Exemption" allowing a one-time raise of up to $5 million within four years with basic disclosure requirements, and a "Financing Exemption" permitting raises of up to $75 million every 12 months with stricter obligations, including financial statements and ongoing reporting. Both paths require "principles-based narrative disclosure," a flexible approach distinct from traditional IPO forms. The most transformative element is the investment contract safe harbor. It provides a legal path for tokens to "graduate" from being classified as securities. If an issuer completes or permanently ceases its "essential managerial efforts" as promised in the investment contract and meets specific conditions, it can file with the SEC to have the token exit the securities framework. This creates a novel legal lifecycle where a token can begin as a regulated security for fundraising and later become a non-security asset as the network decentralizes. This move is seen as the SEC pragmatically filling a legislative vacuum, as the stalled CLARITY Act in Congress faces significant delays. The proposal aims to offer a compliant pathway for token offerings within the U.S., countering the trend of projects moving overseas. While currently a proposal open for a 60-day public comment period, it signals a major potential shift from an enforcement-heavy approach toward establishing clearer rules for the crypto industry.

marsbit29m ago

SEC Suddenly Proposes "Regulation Crypto": U.S. Token Fundraising May Become Legal Again

marsbit29m ago

Late Qing County Magistrates' 'Official Debt' and the Crypto World's 'Exchange Listings': The Cross-Temporal Truth of Financializing Power

This article draws parallels between financialization of power in late Qing Dynasty China and the modern cryptocurrency industry. It opens with a staggering contemporary corruption case involving billions, illustrating how official positions control massive cash flows, akin to toll booths. The core analysis focuses on Du Fengzhi, a late Qing county magistrate. His 22-year journey from passing the provincial exam to finally obtaining a post highlights how bureaucratic "qualification" (like a VC investment) doesn't guarantee immediate benefit. Crucially, upon receiving his appointment, Du had to borrow heavily—"official debt"—to cover travel and networking costs to actually assume his position. Lenders, seeing his future post as a revenue-generating asset, offered loans with exorbitant effective interest rates (e.g., borrowing 4000 taels but receiving only 2000), effectively discounting and financializing his future power. Once in office, Du faced immense pressure from both public tax quotas and his crippling private debt. His diaries reveal aggressive, sometimes extreme, tax collection methods (sealing ancestral temples, pressuring local gentry) to meet these demands. The article argues this created a system where public duty and private financial survival became indistinguishable, with corruption evolving from operational necessity to normalized practice. The piece consistently analogizes this to crypto: VC funding as mere "qualification," the costly "listing" process on exchanges, the role of market makers and KOLs as intermediaries akin to local gentry, and the relentless pressure on funded projects to deliver returns—often leading to perpetual pivots, artificial metrics, and ultimately, the extraction of value from retail liquidity. Both systems, it concludes, are driven by the financialization of future potential, trapping individuals in cycles of debt and obligation with limited alternatives for upward mobility.

marsbit36m ago

Late Qing County Magistrates' 'Official Debt' and the Crypto World's 'Exchange Listings': The Cross-Temporal Truth of Financializing Power

marsbit36m ago

U.S. Stock Market Trends (August 19th): AI Hardware Rally Loosens, Long-Term Bond Yields Challenge Tech Valuations

U.S. stocks weakened further on Tuesday, with major indices hitting two-week lows for a third consecutive session. Pressure centered on the AI hardware sector, as the previously rebounding Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell sharply. Meanwhile, persistently high long-term Treasury yields and rising oil prices fueled by Middle East tensions prompted a cautious reassessment of high-valuation tech assets. Key closing data: The S&P 500 fell 0.69%, the Dow Jones dropped 0.22%, and the Nasdaq declined 1.33%. The 10-year Treasury yield hovered near 4.70%, while the 30-year yield briefly touched a new high since 2007 before settling around 5.28%. WTI crude rose to $84.94. The chip sector led the decline, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropping about 5%. Losses spread across memory, optical communication, and AI infrastructure stocks. This shift indicates investor focus is moving from chasing AI demand momentum to evaluating valuations and earnings timing. The "Magnificent Seven" stocks showed mixed performance, with pressure more concentrated on AI hardware than software giants. The market is observing whether capital will rotate back to large-cap tech, sustaining the internal AI sector rotation, or if the broader AI trade is entering a cooling phase. Chinese stocks were mostly weaker, with the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index down about 1%. Baidu's stock fell sharply post-earnings due to profit pressure from AI investments, while Alibaba gained. Persistently high long-term bond yields and rising oil prices are re-emerging as key anchors for U.S. stock pricing, constraining valuation multiples for AI-related companies. Corporate events, including earnings from Home Depot and AI financing news like Anthropic's reported credit line expansion, continue to highlight cost and capital expenditure pressures. Focus for the coming sessions: 1) Whether the 30-year Treasury yield stabilizes below 5.30%, and 2) The market's ability to absorb the chip sector sell-off, determining if it's a pre-earnings consolidation or the start of a broader AI hardware cool-down.

marsbit40m ago

U.S. Stock Market Trends (August 19th): AI Hardware Rally Loosens, Long-Term Bond Yields Challenge Tech Valuations

marsbit40m ago

Galaxy Research: Crypto Lending Contracts for Third Consecutive Quarter, Market Undergoing Orderly Deleveraging

**Galaxy Research Report: Crypto Lending Market Sees Orderly Deleveraging for Third Consecutive Quarter** The crypto asset-backed lending market contracted for a third consecutive quarter in Q2 2026, shrinking by $11.33B (-16.78%) to a total of $56.16B. This represents a 40.13% decline from the Q3 2025 peak. The process is marked by a controlled, "stair-step" decline rather than the sharp, cascading collapses seen in 2022, suggesting a healthier, more orderly deleveraging driven by market retrenchment rather than forced liquidations. Key findings include: * **CeFi vs. DeFi:** Centralized Finance (CeFi) lending ($22.98B) surpassed Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending ($20.43B) for the first time since Q3 2023, as DeFi loan volumes fell 27.61% quarter-over-quarter. * **Market Leaders:** Tether remains the dominant CeFi lender, holding 58.54% market share. CeFi's top three players (Tether, Maple, Nexo) control nearly 75% of that segment. * **Corporate Debt:** Debt used by companies for digital asset treasury strategies declined by $1.5B to $16.1B, mainly due to a debt buyback by MicroStrategy. * **Rates & Leverage:** Stablecoin borrowing costs edged higher. Analysis of Aave V3 shows e-mode loans, primarily used for leveraged Ethereum staking strategies, carry significantly higher risk (debt-weighted avg. Health Factor ~1.06) compared to standard loans. * **Futures:** Aggregate futures open interest (OI) was relatively stable, down only 3.08% to $103.2B at quarter-end, though it has since rebounded. BTC and ETH futures OI together comprised 65% of the total. In conclusion, the crypto market continues to shed leverage in a measured manner. If this trend persists, the market may avoid the type of disorderly, cascading failures seen in the last cycle, even if lending activity continues to contract.

marsbit1h ago

Galaxy Research: Crypto Lending Contracts for Third Consecutive Quarter, Market Undergoing Orderly Deleveraging

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

404 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片