Члены криптосообщества обвинили стартап Fantasy в удержании 4000 ETH комиссий

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-07-12Last updated on 2025-11-13

Криптосообщество обвинило проект Fantasy в несправедливом распределении доходов после заявления, что при заработке около 4 тыс. ETH на комиссиях команда выделила всего 22 ETH для призового фонда дебютного турнира. Пользователи социальной сети X отметили, что проект ранее обещал направлять часть доходов обратно в экосистему, однако их доля оказалась мизерной, а большая часть, по всей видимости, перешла в кошельки разработчиков.

Популярный аналитик под псевдонимом punk9059 напомнил, что изначально верил в обещания команды, но позже разочаровался: «Жадные разработчики не становятся щедрыми со временем. Те, кто привык оставлять средства себе, редко начинают инвестировать в сообщество». Его пост вызвал бурную реакцию среди пользователей.

Многие комментаторы назвали ситуацию показательной для крипторынка, где отсутствуют реальные обязательства по распределению прибыли. Юзеры подчеркнули, что у проекта не было юридических требований возвращать средства, следовательно, наивно было ожидать щедрости от создателей.

Другие участники дискуссии были менее сдержанными. Пользователи назвали действия команды бессовестными и заявили, что разработчики «украли $15 млн у сообщества». Они назвали проект убыточным. По словам специалистов, совокупные убытки инвесторов, трейдеров и геймеров составляют более $13 млн.

Некоторые пользователи иронизировали над ситуацией, отмечая, что команда поблагодарила сообщество за «заработанные $12 млн» и выделила при этом лишь около $66 000 для призового фонда. Они назвали это насмешкой над участниками. Инцидент вновь поднял вопрос о прозрачности и подотчетности криптопроектов. Несмотря на заявления о ценности сообщества и справедливости со стороны разработчиков, большинство подобных инициатив не регулируются, что оставляет инвесторов без механизмов защиты.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Century-Old Interlocking Director Law Revived, a16z Faces Antitrust Investigation

The US Department of Justice has reportedly launched an antitrust investigation into venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). The probe focuses on whether a16z's investment partners have improperly held board seats at competing artificial intelligence companies, specifically Databricks Inc. and Fivetran Inc. a16z co-founder Ben Horowitz sits on Databricks' board, while partner Martin Casado is a board member at Fivetran. Both companies are direct competitors in the business of collecting, organizing, and analyzing large-scale enterprise data. The investigation has run parallel to the DOJ's review of Fivetran's acquisition of a similar company, dbt Labs, which was completed last year and ultimately approved. A potential resolution could require the a16z partners to resign from one of the competing boards, a common remedy in similar cases during the Biden administration. The probe highlights the enforcement of a 1914 law against "interlocking directorates," where individuals or entities serve on the boards of rival firms. This case is notable as the alleged conflict involves multiple partners from the same firm, rather than a single individual. a16z, managing $90 billion in assets, is a major political donor and has significant influence in AI policy. The investigation's outcome remains uncertain, and the DOJ may ultimately take no action.

marsbit9m ago

Century-Old Interlocking Director Law Revived, a16z Faces Antitrust Investigation

marsbit9m ago

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit28m ago

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit28m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit29m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit29m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit48m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions