Coinbase and Strategy post record Q3 earnings — Both double down on Bitcoin holdings

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-30Last updated on 2025-10-30

Key Takeaways

Why do Coinbase and Strategy’s earnings matter to Bitcoin investors?

Both firms are expanding BTC holdings, signaling that institutional conviction remains strong even as prices dip.

Could this trend affect Bitcoin’s next move?

Continued balance sheet accumulation could anchor BTC’s price in the $105K–$110K zone and trigger a recovery if demand stays firm.

Coinbase and Strategy Inc. [formerly MicroStrategy] posted strong Q3 2025 earnings. The earnings report signals a deepening wave of institutional Bitcoin accumulation even as the asset trades lower near $107,000.

Coinbase doubles down

Coinbase reported $1.8 billion in revenue and $433 million in net income, marking its strongest quarter since 2021. 

CEO Brian Armstrong confirmed the company’s expanding exposure, stating, “Coinbase is long Bitcoin. Our holdings increased by 2,772 BTC in Q3 — and we keep buying more.”

Coinbase Q3 earningsCoinbase Q3 earnings

Source: X

According to data from Bitcoin Treasuries, Coinbase now holds 14,548 BTC, making it the ninth-largest holder.

The exchange’s stablecoin revenue climbed to $355 million, while derivatives trading volume surpassed $840 billion, earning Coinbase the top position among U.S. exchanges offering 24/7 perpetual contracts. Its assets under custody now stand at $300 billion.

Strategy’s Bitcoin-led windfall

Strategy Inc. recorded $2.8 billion in quarterly profit and $12.9 billion in unrealized BTC gains. The firm now holds 640,808 BTC, valued at around $70.9 billion at current market prices. 

It remains the largest corporate holder of BTC, according to data from Bitcoin Treasuries.

The company is targeting a 30% annual BTC yield by year-end — a sharp contrast to traditional treasury strategies, reflecting its commitment to Bitcoin as a primary reserve asset.

Institutional accumulation deepens

The reports from Coinbase and Strategy show that corporations are no longer just supporting ETFs, they are buying Bitcoin directly and expanding crypto-linked revenue streams.

This trend coincides with stablecoin market growth past $160 billion, record on-chain derivatives volumes, and a rise in corporate treasury exposure.

Together, these highlight the growing institutional infrastructure surrounding Bitcoin.

Bitcoin outlook

Bitcoin has declined by approximately 2% over the past 24 hours to $107,585, despite institutional optimism. On-chain data and exchange flows suggest continued accumulation in the $106K–$115K range.

Bitcoin price trendBitcoin price trend

Source: TradingView

A move above $110K could reignite momentum if these corporate inflows persist into November.

Next: EOS token plunges 10% amid sell-offs – Why THIS support is key!
Share

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit20m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit20m ago

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

TSMC Gains Another Strategic Advantage as Samsung Delays 1.4nm Process Samsung Foundry has adjusted its advanced process roadmap, postponing the mass production timeline for its 1.4nm process from 2027 to 2029. This two-year delay signals a strategic shift from aggressively pursuing the next node to focusing on maturing and scaling its 2nm platform. Samsung plans to extend the commercial lifespan of its 2nm technology through derivative versions optimized for different applications, including those incorporating backside power delivery for AI and HPC chips. A notable aspect of this shift is Samsung's cautious approach toward High-NA EUV lithography. The company views it as essential for 1nm-class nodes and beyond but not as an immediate necessity for 1.4nm, opting instead to refine its existing Low-NA EUV-based processes. This highlights a broader industry trend where the competition is evolving beyond simply reaching the next node. Success now depends on achieving high yield, managing soaring costs, integrating new transistor architectures like GAA, and delivering a compelling overall package of performance, power efficiency, and area (PPA) at a viable cost. While Samsung consolidates its 2nm efforts, TSMC continues its advance. Its N2 node is in production, and the A16 node (post-2nm, ~1.6nm) is scheduled for mass production in the second half of 2026. A16 introduces TSMC's Super Power Rail backside power delivery technology, which is expected to deliver significant performance and power efficiency gains. TSMC's previously stated cautious stance on High-NA EUV appears validated by Samsung's roadmap adjustment. The delay underscores that the competition in leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing is entering a new phase. It is no longer just a race to smaller node numbers but a multifaceted contest involving process maturity, yield, cost, design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), and advanced packaging. Samsung aims to solidify its 2nm platform over the next three years. However, as it targets 1.4nm for 2029, the industry will be watching how far ahead TSMC and Intel have moved by then.

marsbit26m ago

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

marsbit26m ago

The Top 'Doghead Strategist' in the Blind Date Scene: Doubao

"The 'First Dating Strategist': AI's New Role in Love and Deception This article explores the growing, and often troubling, reliance on AI, specifically tools like the chatbot 'Doubao', for navigating modern relationships. It begins by highlighting a cultural shift where having the social intelligence of an AI is seen as a compliment, and people increasingly turn to algorithms for solutions to romantic dilemmas, from analyzing chat histories to crafting responses. The piece then delves into a stark case study involving internet celebrity Han Anran, who was allegedly targeted in an 'AI-powered pig-butchering scam' by her ex-boyfriend. He reportedly used AI to create a detailed, coldly calculated manual from their very first day of dating. This document outlined strategies for emotional manipulation, psychological control, and resource extraction, setting a 10-billion-yuan financial goal over a decade. This incident underscores how AI can systematize deception, turning complex emotional exploitation into a scalable, efficient operation. Beyond high-stakes fraud, the article examines the pervasive, everyday use of AI 'proxy chatting' in dating. People outsource everything from flirty replies to breakup messages to AI, resulting in generic, awkward, and often easily detectable interactions. This 'outsourcing of love' creates a facade of connection while eroding genuine emotional effort and authenticity. While some users see it as a helpful crutch, it often reveals a lack of sincerity and a disrespect for the partner's intelligence. The commentary argues that we are entering a 'love cheating era'. While AI began as a benign tool to compensate for social awkwardness, its misuse is reshaping the rules of engagement. Relationships risk becoming data exchanges between systems, with humans as secondary players. The deeper crisis is not that AI is becoming more human-like, but the growing belief that humans are inferior to AI in providing perfect, calculated responses. The article concludes with a critical reflection: AI itself is amoral; it merely amplifies the intentions of its users. It did not invent deception but has made it more efficient and detached. In a world where affection can be algorithmic and intimacy can be a scam, the piece poses urgent questions: Do we still dare to love a flawed, specific person? And in an age of pervasive 'cheating', are those who offer their awkward, un-augmented genuine selves still worthy of love?"

marsbit30m ago

The Top 'Doghead Strategist' in the Blind Date Scene: Doubao

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions