Ethereum drops below $4k as selling pressure mounts: More pain ahead?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-24Last updated on 2025-09-25

Key Takeaways

Why are sharks dominating Ethereum accumulation now?

Sharks holding 10k-100k ETH are aggressively buying as whales exit spot markets, causing a surge in wealth concentration and network inequality.

What does this mean for Ethereum’s price outlook?

If shark demand strengthens and aligns with whale Futures activity, ETH could rebound toward $4,390, but failure to hold $4k risks a drop to $3,886.


Ethereum [ETH] has declined for seven consecutive days, breaching $4k, and briefly touching $3.9k before rebounding. At press time, Ethereum was trading at $4005, marking a 4.08% decline over the past 24 hours. 

Amid this price breakdown, investors, especially sharks, have taken the opportunity to accumulate aggressively. 

Sharks displace Ethereum whales

Interestingly, with ETH facing intense downward pressure, the market has witnessed a dramatic shift in power dynamics. 

According to Alphractal’s founder, Joao Wedson, the number of Ethereum whales has dropped massively, with sharks taking over. 

Ethereum addresses with 10-100k ETH

Source: Alphractal

As such, addresses holding 10k-100k ETH have turned to aggressive accumulation and now take a chunk of the market share. 

At the same time, the Gini Coefficient has started to rise, suggesting that ETH is becoming more concentrated in wealthier addresses, especially sharks.

With sharks accumulating at higher rates than smaller holders, it has resulted in a massive spike in network inequality. 

Ethereum Gini Coefficient

Source: Alphractal

In fact, AMBCrypto analysis of Nansen uncovered such purchases over the past day. On the 25th of September, a shark wallet ‘medium uniswap’ bought 21.59k ETH worth $87.43 million. 

Ethereum sharks buys

Source: Nansen

This implies that investors actively engaged with ETH at the moment are mid-sized entities and players with medium-level capital. 

On top of that, exchange activities further echoed this accumulation trend.

According to CryptoQuant data, Ethereum has recorded a Negative Exchange Netflow for two consecutive days, recording a positive value once every eight days.

Ethereum exchange netflow

Source: CryptoQuant

At press time, Netflow was -49k ETH, a drop from -118k the previous day, a clear sign of aggressive accumulation. Often, increased accumulation has resulted in a positive impact on an asset price trajectory.

Whales jump into Futures 

While sharks accumulated aggressively, Ethereum whales were not sitting idle, but were rather actively participating in the Futures market. 

According to CryptoQuant data, the Futures Average Order Size has signaled a whale comeback into the Futures market. 

Ethereum futures average order size

Source: CryptoQuant

Whales had taken a step back from the Futures, but after 27 days, the altcoin recorded Big Whale Orders for three consecutive days. 

As a result, Ethereum’s Perpetuals Volume surged to $584 million, holding within a monthly high reflecting increased participation. 

Ethereum Perpetual volume

Source: Defillama

When these two metrics rise in tandem, it suggests that whales are currently driving Futures, either through shorts or longs.

Any impact on ETH?

Surprisingly, despite increased shark accumulation, it has yet to have a positive impact on Ethereum’s price movement. As such, ETH still experiencing intense downward pressure from other market players at press time.

However, if the market finally feels shark accumulation activity, it could boost ETH towards recovery. Thus, any upside pressure will boost the king of altcoins to reclaim $4390.

Conversely, if the prevailing market conditions persist, ETH risks a dip below $4k again, with support around $3886.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

The core of recent semiconductor stock volatility is not about daily price swings, but rather the market questioning whether AI-driven semiconductor pricing has entered a new phase. Following a sharp sell-off in Korean stocks on June 23rd, led by Samsung and SK Hynix, a subsequent rebound is seen more as a technical positioning adjustment rather than a confirmed trend reversal. The key variable is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), essential for AI chips. Its supply-demand imbalance granted memory makers significant pricing power. The current market focus is on whether this dynamic remains strong enough to justify elevated valuations. All eyes are on Micron's upcoming earnings report. The critical factor is not whether results meet already high expectations, but whether the company's guidance confirms that AI memory pricing power, order visibility, and future margins are still expanding. Micron's outlook will serve as a crucial test for the broader AI semiconductor chain, including Samsung, SK Hynix, and other infrastructure players. The recent bounce appears to be a pre-earnings positioning repair. For it to evolve into a sustained uptrend, concrete evidence is needed that the AI infrastructure expansion cycle's fundamentals—particularly for high-end memory—remain robust and can continue to surpass elevated market expectations. The risk is that strong demand alone may not be sufficient if future guidance hints at peaking momentum or increasing supply-side pressures.

marsbit30m ago

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

marsbit30m ago

Global Tech Stocks Plunge: Another Stress Test for the AI Bull Market

Global tech stocks plummeted in a sharp selloff on June 23, with South Korea's KOSPI index crashing nearly 10%, triggering a trading halt. The plunge was led by semiconductor giants Samsung and SK Hynix, dragging down major Asian and US tech indexes and levered ETFs. The immediate trigger was a confluence of three signals within 24 hours: 1) reports that SK Hynix was slowing HBM4 expansion, raising doubts about a key AI chip bottleneck; 2) profit-taking ahead of Micron's earnings report after its massive year-to-date rally; and 3) a warning from Korean regulators about the risks of single-stock leveraged ETFs. The selloff's severity was amplified by Korea's uniquely leveraged market structure: record-high retail margin debt, over $30 billion in volatile single-stock leveraged ETFs requiring daily rebalancing (which creates selling pressure during declines), and the surprising shift of the National Pension Service from a net buyer to a net seller. The event reignited debates about an AI bubble. Analysts differed on timing—some warned of imminent rupture, others saw a temporary liquidity-driven correction—but agreed that sky-high valuations, a shift to retail/leveraged buying, and rising rates created a fragile setup. The parallel steep drop in SpaceX's stock, alongside its massive debt raise for AI infrastructure, underscored a broader market shift from narrative-driven "infinite imagination" to a "return on investment" calculation phase. All eyes are now on Micron's upcoming earnings report, seen as a key test for the AI hardware trade's fundamental logic. A strong report could stabilize markets, while a miss could validate deeper fears. The episode serves as a stark warning: when a bull run becomes dependent on leveraged bets on a single narrative, a violent and rapid correction should not be a surprise. The core question for investors is how much drawdown they are willing to tolerate to stay invested.

marsbit32m ago

Global Tech Stocks Plunge: Another Stress Test for the AI Bull Market

marsbit32m ago

Ethereum Foundation Cuts 20% of Staff, 54 Depart: The Survival Logic Behind the Restructuring

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major restructuring, resulting in the departure of 54 staff members, representing approximately 20% of its workforce. This reorganization is not merely a cost-cutting measure but a strategic refocusing. The EF will now concentrate its resources on what it deems critical and unique tasks, structured around five new operational clusters. The new structure comprises clusters dedicated to: the Protocol Layer (ensuring Ethereum's core properties like censorship resistance and security); the Access Layer (enabling trusted, non-intermediated user interactions); the User Layer (grounding decisions in real user needs and constraints); the Community Layer (representing EF's stance and building alliances); and the Institutional Layer (engaging with enterprises, governments, and academia to promote principled adoption). The foundation stated that the layoffs were a difficult but necessary step to align its organization and spending with its long-term mandate, insulating its core work from short-term market fluctuations. Affected employees were offered a severance package and transition support. The restructured EF emerges as a leaner and more focused organization, poised to prioritize the development and preservation of Ethereum's foundational promise of self-sovereignty. Further details on the new operational model are expected in the coming weeks.

marsbit35m ago

Ethereum Foundation Cuts 20% of Staff, 54 Depart: The Survival Logic Behind the Restructuring

marsbit35m ago

Talking About Returns But Not Collection? Goldfinch's Liquidation Sounds the Alarm for RWA Credit

Goldfinch, a crypto lending platform connecting investors with real-world borrowers, has proposed a full wind-down via governance proposal GIP-87. The plan would halt all new development, shut down its flagship Goldfinch Prime product, and allocate 150,000 USDC to manage the collection of outstanding loans. While the proposal is under community vote, it highlights a critical shift for the RWA (Real World Asset) lending sector: the transition from a growth phase focused on yields to a difficult recovery phase focused on collections. The proposal reveals that while the protocol's on-chain TVL is low, it still holds tens of millions in active, non-performing loans off-chain. This gap underscores that tokenizing debt makes tracking exposure transparent but does not simplify the offline, labor-intensive, and legally complex process of loan recovery. The case of the Lend East pool, where only an estimated 42% of a $10.15 million loan may be recovered, exemplifies the potential for significant investor losses. The wind-down plan forces token holders to govern not expansion but the maintenance of a debt collection system, including funding legal trust structures and preserving user access for repayments. This move starkly contrasts with the sector's typical narrative of rapid, AI-powered underwriting and high yields, exposing the often-overlooked necessity for robust borrower vetting, standardized disclosure, and sustainable collection mechanisms. Ultimately, Goldfinch's situation serves as a crucial stress test for the entire RWA lending space. It demonstrates that a platform's true resilience is tested not during capital deployment but during the protracted, costly, and uncertain process of recovering defaulted loans from real-world borrowers, a challenge blockchain transparency alone cannot solve.

Foresight News40m ago

Talking About Returns But Not Collection? Goldfinch's Liquidation Sounds the Alarm for RWA Credit

Foresight News40m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片