比特币的涨幅为何会停滞?

深潮Published on 2025-09-09Last updated on 2025-09-10

比特币现货积累仍在进行,否则比特币价格很可能远低于当前水平。

撰文:Matt Crosb

编译:AididiaoJP,Foresight News

尽管机构持续增持,但比特币的价格走势仍不尽如人意,供需动态显示长期持有者正在获利了结。

近几周,比特币的价格让许多投资者感到困惑。尽管机构和国库公司大量增持,比特币价格却一直处于横盘状态。这究竟是机构增持的谎言,还是我们仅仅目睹了供需之间的拉锯战?

在深入研究了链上数据、国库持仓以及衍生品活动,以区分事实与阴谋论,并解释真正推动比特币价格的因素。

机构增持与比特币价格停滞的矛盾

过去几个月,ETF 和国库公司估计累计增持了 20 万枚 BTC。从整体来看,国库总持仓量现已接近 100 万枚比特币。然而尽管有这些资金流入,比特币价格在短暂触及 12 万美元以上的历史新高后回落至 10.8 万美元,之后便一直横盘整理。

为什么这种机构需求没有反映在比特币价格上?答案在于长期持有者的获利了结。自 7 月以来,已有超过 45 万枚 BTC 从长期钱包转移至新的短期市场参与者手中。这种派发行为实际上抵消了机构资金流入对比特币价格的看涨影响。

长期持有者正在获利了结

链上数据清楚显示,持有比特币四至十年的群体正在抛售。这些投资者以远低于当前的价格积累比特币,如今随着比特币价格创下历史新高,他们正在实现利润。

这种模式并不新鲜。从历史上看,长期持有者会在散户和机构推高比特币价格时减少持仓,等到市场冷却后再重新积累。当前数据表明,这一群体的抛压正在加速,加剧了比特币价格的横盘震荡。

衍生品因素的影响

对比特币价格走势形成拖累的另一个因素是期货和期权活动的增加。自 7 月以来,各交易所的衍生品未平仓合约量增加了约 5 万枚 BTC。虽然这不能直接证明「杠杆比特币」的存在,但这确实意味着资金流入了杠杆赌注,而非现货积累,从而限制了比特币价格的上行压力。

CME 期货和期权市场也显著扩张,放大了衍生品对短期比特币价格走势的影响。其净效应是:更多流动性被锁定在合约中,BTC 本身的直接买压减少。

供需动态的作用

那么,比特币价格是否被杠杆比特币操纵?证据并不强烈支持这一结论。我们正在目睹的是实时供需经济学在发挥作用:

机构累计增持 20 万枚 BTC。

长期持有者派发 45 万枚 BTC。

5 万枚以上 BTC 锁定在衍生品市场。

综合来看,这解释了为什么尽管机构需求登上头条,比特币价格却依然停滞不前。

比特币价格下一步如何走?

尽管当前状况表明短期内可能继续震荡整理,但这并不像是市场顶部。如果资金费率转为负值,一场空头挤压可能会推动比特币价格再次上涨。然而就目前而言,积累与派发之间的不平衡表明横盘走势可能持续。

放眼全局,比特币的牛市依然完好。担心「杠杆比特币」的投资者应记住:现货积累仍在进行,如果没有它,比特币价格很可能远低于当前水平。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit34m ago

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit34m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit35m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit35m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit54m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit54m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片