加密市场血雨 BTC 或跌至 10 万 ETH 急挫瞄准 3900 XDOG 苦撑 LINK 却被大佬扫货

金色财经Published on 2025-08-18Last updated on 2025-08-18

今早比特币、以太坊大跌,山寨又跟着被血洗!最近24小时,全球共有 126,975 人被爆仓 ,爆仓总金额为 $5.35 亿!

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

BTC

比特币118000关键点位失守,此处为成交量极值,多空双方激烈博弈,投入最大力量决出胜负。目前需下探寻找新需求,积累市场共识。

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

周线显示BTC明显顶部信号,如长上影线和吞没形态,暗示行情偏空。若本周确认死叉和顶背离,比特币可能跌破10万美元。尽管议息会议和就业数据可能带来短期反弹,但技术面仍偏向下行。日线未现理想反弹,未来可能先反弹再下跌。

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

关键价位:若无反弹,首看11.2万美元,跌破后可能形成大级别顶部,下探9.9万美元。历史数据显示,跌破维加斯通道常为现货布局良机,值得长期投资者关注。

ETH

以太坊触及历史高点(2021年峰值),首要任务是防守。无论你的成本高低,别主观认为一定能突破。实际操作中,突破是否站稳很难判断,往往带点运气。因此,我倾向于保护已有利润,而不是赌突破单。如果是真突破,后面机会多;假突破则可能亏大。

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

当下ETH多头想守住周线的突破,比如4150这些关键位置。空头一直想破坏结构,今天周一应该有好戏看了,多空大战。若4200无法支撑,下一步将看向3900(暂时观望等止跌再冲锋)

今日以太坊为何暴跌

Hyperliquid上一名大户的以太多单濒临清算,最高盈利超2000万未止盈,现处爆仓边缘。爆仓价4258,刚才价格插针至4255,疑似被捡尸体的聪明钱抢跑导致清算失败。

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

山寨

这一轮牛市里,山寨币这么难炒的原因很简单——行情不持续!

现在市场上 90% 的山寨币像 LPT 一样,从底部反弹几十个点上去,然后又掉回来,而且反弹基本都会突破压力位,让很多散户产生“突破关键点,要涨了”的错觉。结果第二天就跌回原点。

反复几次,散户不断止损,本金被消耗干净。等到下一波持续一个月的山寨行情来了,散户以为这次真的要涨,重新充钱进场,又被套住。

这样下去,玩山寨币的人会越来越少,资金最后会集中到几个头部主流币上,行情两极分化会越来越明显。

链上

OKB 没怎么下跌,链上的 meme 币却一夜之间全线崩盘,只剩下龙头 XDOG 在艰难支撑。

xdog走的真硬,不愧是龙一,市值又站稳一千万了。

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

LINK

链上大庄换仓link,一方面以太坊性价比不再高,但是他们还想复利,又能承载大资金、叙事万金油的link作为首选,Link现阶段有收入自己回购做先做Treasury在考虑做别的比其它山寨币合理很多,也更适合传统市场看懂。每周1M的量看起来没很多,但是给市场注入了很高的预期,可以逢低布局一点。

0?wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg

最后想说

整体来看,本轮下跌并不意味着牛市的终结,而更像是一次健康的回调。震荡≠见顶,回调=蓄力。在恐慌蔓延时,守住关键支撑、稳住筹码,才能在下一轮行情到来时站稳脚跟。对于长期投资者而言,真正的机会或许正藏在市场最恐慌的时候。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

The article argues that as tokenization frameworks for Real-World Assets (RWA) mature, the ability to issue assets is becoming less of a competitive advantage. The focus is shifting to what happens *after* issuance: which RWA operations can build enduring trust, maintain stable operations, and remain integrated into the financial ecosystem over the long term. The piece introduces the concept of a **Reserve Layer**—infrastructure that connects tokenized assets to the necessary verification, liquidity, and operational systems for on-chain finance. For an asset to serve as a reliable reserve (e.g., short-term U.S. Treasuries, gold), it needs predictable value, standardized features, deep markets, and observable pricing. However, the true, hard-to-replicate advantage lies not just in the underlying asset but in the **operational track record** built over time. This includes consistent reserve management, independent audits, successful redemptions, maintained liquidity, and protocol integrations. Each successful operation adds evidence, creating a reinforcing cycle: more evidence builds stronger institutional confidence, leading to wider distribution, deeper liquidity, and more use cases as collateral. The article presents a framework combining two dimensions: an asset's suitability as a reserve and the issuer's operational capability. The most sustainable model combines **high-quality reserve assets with strong, long-term operational discipline**. A critical blind spot is an asset with high reserve suitability (like gold) issued by an entity with a limited operational track record; the quality of the infrastructure is separate from the quality of the asset itself. In conclusion, the next phase of RWA will be defined by participants who can pair appropriate reserve assets with the operational rigor to support them through market cycles, thereby transforming tokenized RWAs into durable financial infrastructure.

marsbit1m ago

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

marsbit1m ago

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

Researchers have demonstrated a novel attack, dubbed ToolLeak, that can easily compromise AI coding assistants like Claude Code. The method exploits a "mode gap" by stealing the system prompts (instructions) not through direct chat queries, but by tricking the model into leaking them as parameters during tool calls. This extracted information is then used to craft a "two-channel prompt injection" attack. Attackers register a malicious tool with a description formatted to mimic legitimate instructions, prompting the AI agent to call it. The tool's return value then instructs the agent to execute a malicious command (e.g., `curl | bash`), achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE). In tests against six major AI programming tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Trae) using older versions, all were fully compromised, with attack success rates reaching up to 1.0. Notably, Claude Code's secondary guard model (Haiku) was overridden by the main model (Sonnet), which had been manipulated by the injected instructions. Newer versions show improved defenses. Claude Code and Cursor implemented mitigations like "progressive tool description exposure," reducing RCE success to 0 and 0.3 respectively in some configurations. However, tools like Cline, Windsurf, and Trae paired with certain models remained fully vulnerable. The research underscores that architectural isolation is crucial for defense, as long as tool return values can ambiguously function as both data and executable instructions, the threat of tool hijacking persists. The paper "TIPExploit: Tool-Invocation Prompt Extraction and Exploitation in AI Coding Agents" has been accepted at ISSTA 2026.

marsbit5m ago

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

marsbit5m ago

Bernstein Analysis: Samsung's HBM4 Accelerates Volume, Q3 Revenue May Overtake SK Hynix

South Korea’s July memory export data, serving as an early indicator for HBM business in Q3, shows overall HBM demand remains robust. While total exports to Taiwan and Malaysia declined 32% month-on-month from June’s peak—largely due to seasonality—they were still up 13% compared to April and rose 64% year-on-year. However, a divergence emerged between Samsung and SK Hynix. Samsung’s exports from Chungcheongnam-do (a proxy for its HBM shipments) surged, reaching $2.2 billion in July, up 122% from April. Based on regression analysis, Bernstein estimates Samsung’s Q3 HBM revenue could hit around $12 billion, roughly 30% above its prior forecast, driven by a rapid ramp in higher-value HBM4. The unit value of Samsung’s exports has doubled since April, signaling a shift toward HBM4, which carries a significantly higher price. In contrast, exports linked to SK Hynix from Chungcheongbuk-do and Icheon fell 28% month-on-month and 27% versus April. Bernstein’s base model suggests SK Hynix’s Q3 HBM revenue could drop to about $5.6 billion, though this could rebound to $12 billion if shipments concentrate later in the quarter as historically seen. The weakness may relate to potential delays in HBM4 shipments for Nvidia’s Rubin platform. Notably, HBM pricing is decoupling from general DRAM, with HBM4 mix driving average selling prices rather than broad-based hikes. Exports to Malaysia also surged, possibly linked to Intel’s EMIB packaging facilities, though the exact drivers remain unclear. While July data reinforces Samsung’s accelerating momentum in HBM4, it is insufficient to confirm a full-year market share reversal. Key factors to watch are Samsung’s August-September export performance, whether SK Hynix recovers lost ground, and upcoming 2027 HBM contract pricing negotiations.

marsbit6m ago

Bernstein Analysis: Samsung's HBM4 Accelerates Volume, Q3 Revenue May Overtake SK Hynix

marsbit6m ago

The New Rules of the AI Race: Nvidia Shifts from Chips to Energy Resources and Construction Sites

Nvidia is providing a $105 billion financial guarantee for the construction of OpenAI's data center campus in Ohio, signaling a strategic shift in the AI industry from competing on chips to battling for physical infrastructure and energy resources. The guarantee, detailed in an SEC filing, acts as insurance against tenant default rather than direct construction funding. OpenAI must repay any sums drawn. Nvidia will also invest $1.5 billion in SB Energy for the project's power component. The planned campus has a capacity of 4.25 GW, with OpenAI's current commitments to Nvidia reaching 12 GW. This move underscores that leading AI development now requires securing space, power, and financial backing for massive, long-term projects. Tech giants are taking on roles akin to developers and financial institutions. Concurrently, AI firms are diversifying suppliers: OpenAI and Anthropic have signed major deals with AMD for GPU deployments. Nvidia is also scaling its financial model through partnerships with investment firms to mobilize over $500 billion in external capital. The paradigm in AI is shifting from hardware supremacy to building comprehensive ecosystems. Future industry growth will depend on balancing innovation with real-world infrastructure capabilities, turning abstract computations into tangible industrial projects. An AI analysis notes the deal's resemblance to vendor financing schemes from the telecom bubble of the late 1990s and questions the long-term viability of gas-dependent energy infrastructure for AI, should market growth slow.

cryptonews.ru15m ago

The New Rules of the AI Race: Nvidia Shifts from Chips to Energy Resources and Construction Sites

cryptonews.ru15m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片