Bitcoin Has Been Co-Opted’: Jim Bianco Says Wall Street Hijacked It

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-08-04Last updated on 2025-08-04

Abstract

In an interview with Scott Melker on August 3, veteran macro analyst Jim Bianco leveled a stark critique of Bitcoin’s...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In an interview with Scott Melker on August 3, veteran macro analyst Jim Bianco leveled a stark critique of Bitcoin’s trajectory, arguing that the asset has been “co-opted” by the very institutions it was created to resist. According to Bianco, Wall Street’s embrace of Bitcoin through vehicles like ETFs and corporate treasuries has shifted the network’s purpose from disruptive innovation to speculative asset chasing.

Has Wall Street Co-Opted Bitcoin?

“Bitcoin is amazing,” Melker said, reflecting on his own controversial tweet that sparked backlash from Bitcoin maximalists. “But it’s obviously been co-opted to some degree by the very people that it was created to [hedge] against. Many of the most ardent early whales have seen their faith shaken and have been selling at these prices.” Bianco responded without hesitation: “Yeah, it does,” aligning himself with the view that Bitcoin’s original ethos has been undermined.

“I have been a big fan of these products as a disruptive force for the financial market,” Bianco said, referring to early crypto projects. “The financial market and the banking system is in desperate need of change and disruption. And I saw these [crypto assets] as vehicles that could do that.” But that vision, he argues, has been eclipsed by FOMO and “number go up” culture driven by ETFs, institutional endorsements, and speculative hype cycles.

The institutionalization of Bitcoin—via BlackRock’s ETF, corporate treasuries like MicroStrategy, and the wider TradFi pivot into digital assets—has created what Bianco calls a “disincentive to innovation.” Rather than pushing for payment infrastructure reform or financial sovereignty, the focus has become price action. “I’m just here for number go up,” he said mockingly, summing up the prevailing mindset. “I’m not here to understand where this will fit in, how this will make us a better financial system.”

Bianco contrasted Bitcoin’s current role with Ethereum’s evolving utility, expressing a preference for platforms that aim to “become a new version of a financial system.” While acknowledging that this view may provoke Bitcoin maximalists, Bianco emphasized Ethereum’s potential to enable structural reform—despite being heavily influenced in recent months by regulatory tailwinds like the Genius Act and figures such as Tom Lee.

Still, his criticism extended beyond Bitcoin. He argued that the broader crypto space is repeating past mistakes, especially in regard to stablecoins. “This whole conversation we’re having about stablecoins sounds a lot like the exact conversation we were having in 2021,” he said, cautioning that overhyped narratives often ignore the technological and regulatory challenges still unresolved.

And Solana?

He expressed particular concern that stablecoin infrastructure is veering toward centralization, with projects like JPMorgan Coin and potential Fed-backed instruments masquerading as stablecoins. “That’s a CBDC,” Bianco said bluntly, warning that this trend could gut the decentralized promise of crypto. “There will not be an investable opportunity there for the average person.”

According to Bianco, even Solana—once touted as an institutional-grade blockchain—has strayed from its mission. “It had the promise of being that competitor to JP Morgan and the Federal Reserve,” he said. “And it kind of got lost in this memecoin mania.” He noted that Solana’s price action now appears to be “the metric of memecoins,” and that its identity has been eclipsed by speculative euphoria—an observation reinforced by the network hosting over 10 million memecoins, many of which never trade.

Ultimately, Bianco’s critique centered on the disconnection between crypto’s stated goals and its market behavior. “The Maxis’ argument that everything’s going to zero and you have to have your money in Bitcoin is demonstrably wrong because everything’s at an all-time high right now,” he said. Bitcoin, in his view, now behaves like “a levered risk asset,” moving in tandem with equity markets rather than serving as a true hedge or alternative.

For Bianco, the signal of peak complacency is clear. “This is some of the best investing I’ve ever seen—right up until the moment you’re killed,” he said, likening the market’s current posture to the infamous Top Gun quote. In an environment of frothy valuations, political rate-cut pressure, and inflationary fiscal dominance, the original vision of Bitcoin as an antidote to centralized monetary abuse, he suggests, may be slipping further from reach.

At press time, BTC traded at $114,469.

Bitcoin price
BTC recovers above the EMA50, 1-day chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit6m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit6m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手7m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手7m ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

Summary: The trend of major U.S. technology firms adopting more cost-effective Chinese AI models is gaining momentum. A prime example is Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, which reportedly halved its AI expenditure by switching to Chinese models GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7, while its usage volume increased. This was achieved through a sophisticated cost-saving system featuring intelligent model routing (selecting the most suitable model per task), dramatically improving cache hit rates from 5% to 60%, and implementing "Context Engineering" to streamline prompts. This shift is not isolated. Other companies like the AI startup Lindy and data cloud firm Snowflake are making similar moves, drawn by the significant price disparity. For instance, GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens (input/output), compared to $5/$25 for Claude Opus 4.7. While top Western models may offer slightly higher stability or speed in complex tasks, the performance gap is narrowing, making the price difference harder to justify for many enterprise use cases. The implications are significant for both businesses and individual users. It highlights the importance of a multi-model strategy based on task requirements, the value of caching and reusing outputs, and the effectiveness of providing concise context. Ultimately, this migration signals a potential reshaping of the AI industry's pricing model, moving competition from pure performance benchmarks to practical cost-effectiveness, with increased choice and downward price pressure benefiting end-users.

链捕手13m ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

链捕手13m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

575 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片