以太坊的新愿景

链捕手Published on 2025-07-08Last updated on 2025-07-08

作者:francesco

编译:Block unicorn

 

前言

过去几年,以太坊一直处于十字路口。

日益增加的批评导致基金会领导层的更替,并有望进行更广泛的审查,以提高透明度和参与度,并更加注重在 L1 层面的价值捕获。

以前,很难在以太坊会议上见到执行董事在多个小组讨论中发言。本周,我很高兴看到 Tomasz K. Stańczak(以太坊基金会联合执行董事)尽可能多地参与活动和小组讨论

这真的令人耳目一新,希望这能预示未来的发展方向。

那么……以太坊的未来愿景是什么呢?

我们如何确保这一愿景得到良好的执行?

本文提供了以太坊愿景的概述。

目标

要拥有一个结构化的愿景,必须从目标开始。

图片

对于以太坊而言,主要目标如下:

1. 回归加密精神,如何保护隐私和无需信任特性。

这不仅仅是关于吸引新用户,而是要确保他们能够利用这些价值观和精神,并据此进行构建。

构建,没错,但要带有目的和价值观。

2. 确保以太坊依然是最安全和最具韧性的区块链基础设施。

这与 Vitalik 的一篇关于“万亿美元安全”的帖子相呼应。

这是关于安全性的更广泛讨论的一部分:

  • 如何提高以太坊的安全性?

  • 如何向用户充分传达这一点?

  • 如何确保机构和用户都能充分利用这一点?

最重要的是:

我们如何确保所有技术发展继续秉持以太坊的核心精神和价值观?没有捷径,也没有妥协。

最近,许多人指责以太坊并与开发者有些疏远。

然而,这种情况似乎即将改变。

事实上,我们可以预期以太坊基金会将采取略微更积极的方式,并制定新的资金政策。Thomas 表示,这将被用于探索高效且持久的 DeFi 协议,并对其进行战略性资金分配,从被动方式转变为引导式管理。

这只是一系列将对以太坊长期未来产生深远影响的挑战之一,包括:

  • 监管清晰度

  • AI 采用

  • 隐私问题

图片

其中,一个关键方面和近期主要趋势是机构采用率的提高。

图片

以太坊的未来愿景是将各个领域和行业作为模块化组件处理,使其开源并移除中间机构。

图片
反过来,这些模块将确保从 Web2 到 Web3 的平稳过渡,消除机构之间的摩擦。

想象一下,不同国家的卫生机构能够开放并贡献健康数据存储库。所有这些都通过以太坊链上的交互得到保障,保证了这些解决方案的安全性和可验证性。

最终目标?允许用户在链上交易全球所有资产。

挑战

然而,要实现这一目标,以太坊需要解决用户面临的一些主要挑战和困惑。

图片

因此,未来的重点将放在解决链上隐私和身份识别方面的一些主要挑战,并通过将以太坊打造为人工智能执行的可信层来应对人工智能的威胁。

可信中立。

全球化。

设计上隐私和安全。

所有这些将创造一个多元化的环境,建立一个使不同参与者能够协作的社会结构,最终目标是使以太坊成为一个抗脆弱的网络。

要真正抵制中心化,必须确保来自全球的参与,并纳入多种声音和方法,构建一个真正的全球化网络。

图片

这将使以太坊能够倾听重要议题,并赋予多元化和多样性。

听到关于 L1 和 L2 之间紧张关系的消息也令人耳目一新,以太坊基金会明确表示它们之间没有对立

相反,以太坊将更积极地指导如何确保这些 L2 达到第二阶段,通过以太坊作为底层基础层来保护用户。

图片

最后但同样重要的是,我们看到了实时区块链的出现,如 MegaETH,以及其他快速网络,如 Monad Hyperliquid

这也引发了互操作性和集成方面的问题:

  • 如何确保它们与以太坊主网连接?

  • 如何构建继承以太坊安全参数的 25 毫秒出块时间区块链?

图片

因此,需要引入新的工具来验证在哪些层面可以识别新的挑战,并确保客户端能够与这些网络集成。

这为客户端开发开辟了一个新的创意空间。

以太坊客户端团队均同意每个区块消耗 4500 万甚至 6000 万 Gas,目标是在今年年底或明年第一季度达到 10000 万 Gas。

内部重组将有助于实现这一目标,模块化团队将致力于实现共同目标:

  • 扩展 L1

  • 扩展 Blob

  • 改进用户体验

  • 提升互操作性

你没听错:扩展 L1(此前被忽视的领域)是这些目标之一。

图片

我个人对以太坊持乐观态度,欢迎这种觉醒,并希望看到它进一步的进展。

 

推荐阅读:

暴跌 70% 后仍溢价 100%?SharpLink 的 ETH 豪赌悬念未了

大人虎变,以太坊正在“换骨”

登顶抖音热搜榜,E 卫兵这次真的翻身了?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手3h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片