以太坊(ETH)价格重返5000美元上涨趋势的四大信号

Cointelegraph中文Published on 2025-07-08Last updated on 2025-07-08

Abstract

尽管以太坊多次在2800美元遭遇阻力,但更多利好迹象显示,ETH价格在2025年依然有望冲击5000美元。

要点总结:

  • 以太坊ETF持续获资金流入,显示机构需求依旧强劲。
  • 交易所ETH供应降至八年新低,“巨鲸”不断增持。
  • MVRV价格区间与V型走势暗示ETH有望挑战4000至5000美元价位。

自4月以太坊自1400美元下方低点累计反弹逾100%至2800美元以来,价格已在400美元的窄幅区间震荡近八周。尽管夏季市场表现平淡,多项数据依然表明,ETH价格在2025年有望再度冲击5000美元。

现货以太坊ETF资金持续流入

以太坊能否创下新高,同样受到以太坊相关投资产品资金持续流入的推动,这反映了机构投资者的持续兴趣。

CoinShares数据显示,上周全球以太坊相关投资产品净流入达2.264亿美元。过去11周,这类产品平均每周资金流入占管理资产的1.6%,而同期比特币仅为0.8%。

CoinShares研究主管James Butterfill表示:

“这凸显出投资者情绪正明显偏向以太坊。”

据Farside Investors数据显示,美国现货以太坊ETF以BlackRock旗下iShares Ethereum Trust(ETHA)为代表,周四资金净流入达1.485亿美元,过去两周累计净流入约5.1亿美元。

上周标志着这些投资产品连续第八周的正流入,净流入超过61000枚ETH。

若这一趋势持续,并推动ETH重回2800美元上方,预计2025年下半年价格有望创下历史新高。

交易所ETH供应量降至八年新低

支撑看涨情绪的一个重要因素是交易所供应的持续减少。链上数据提供商Glassnode数据显示,交易所上的ETH余额已降至13.5%,为八年来最低水平,上一次出现这一比例还是在2016年7月。

以太坊在交易所上的供应减少,或预示着由“供应冲击”驱动的价格上涨即将到来,这通常发生在需求上升且供应下滑时。

巨鲸通常在买入后将ETH提离交易所,表明其仍在持续积累。随着可供出售的币数量减少,短期卖压也随之减弱。

过去几周,巨鲸加速积累进一步印证了这一趋势。更多Glassnode数据显示,自5月底以来,持有10万枚及以上ETH的钱包所持ETH数量持续增加。

如上图所示,持有10万枚及以上ETH的钱包中的ETH数量已从5月21日的1810万枚增至本周一的1880万枚,说明巨鲸在近期行情上涨中并未选择抛售。

以太坊SOPR暗示ETH仍有上行空间

已花出产出利润率(SOPR)数据显示,尽管大多数ETH持有者已实现盈利,但市场上尚未出现大规模获利了结。

SOPR用于衡量短期持有者相较于初次买入时是盈利还是亏损。该数值高于1,表示有较高比例的币实现了短线盈利;低于1,则说明大部分币处于亏损状态。

目前以太坊的SOPR为1.01,反映出市场信心较强,投资者不愿意亏损卖出。从历史表现看,SOPR在上涨趋势中持续高于1通常意味着价格仍有上行空间。

以太坊MVRV区间暗示ETH有望涨至5000美元

根据Cointelegraph Markets Pro和TradingView的数据,自5月以来,以太坊价格大致在2400美元至2800美元之间波动。

这一区间由市场价值实现价值(MVRV)比率界定,该比率用于判断资产是否被高估。

以太坊的MVRV极端偏离区间显示,在投资者持有的未实现利润尚未达到下方图表中两条最高MVRV区间所对应的极端水平(4000美元至5000美元之间)前,ETH价格仍有进一步上涨空间。

自2024年12月以来,如下图所示,以太坊价格在周线图上形成了V型反转结构。

目前ETH价格处于2600美元至2800美元这一关键供需区间下方,该区间内分别位于100日和50日简单移动均线(SMA,Simple Moving Average)。多头若能推动价格突破此区域,将有望进一步推动价格升至4100美元颈线,从而完成V型反转结构。

若能突破该水平,下一个合理目标将是2021年创下的历史高点4800美元,较当前价格上涨92%。

多位分析师也认为,ETH今年有望涨至5000美元。他们的理由包括以太坊网络升级,Power of 3(三重力量)价格形态预测,以及来自以太坊金库公司的机构资金流入不断增加。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片