【6月生死线】伊朗欲封霍尔木兹,BTC跌破10万关口,多空决战逼近!

Foresight NewsPublished on 2025-06-23Last updated on 2026-08-24

Abstract

特朗普称为让伊朗「再次伟大」,不惜促其政权更迭。

撰文:1912212.eth,Foresight News

6 月 22 日晚间,伊朗议会国家安全委员会委员库萨里表示,议会已得出结论认为应关闭霍尔木兹海峡,但最终决定权在伊朗最高国家安全委员会手中。消息一经公布,BTC 从 102810 美元一路下滑,最终跌破 10 万美元下探至 98200 美元,现已回升至 100800 美元附近。ETH 则一度跌至 2111 美元,日线再度四连跌。SOL 跌至 126 美元,24 小时跌幅 3.45%,其他山寨币普跌。

合约数据方面,据 coinglass 数据显示,全网未平仓合约 24 小时爆仓 6.58 亿美元,其中多单爆仓 5.26 亿美元,最大单笔爆仓单发生在 HTX - BTC-USDT 价值 3545.03 万美元。

市场风云突变,BTC 短时跌破 10 万美元,伊朗最终真会关闭霍尔木兹海峡吗?

霍尔木兹海峡位于阿曼和伊朗之间,连接了东部的阿曼湾和西部的波斯湾,是海湾地区石油输往世界各地的唯一海上通道,全球约三分之一的海运原油贸易都要途经霍尔木兹海峡。伊朗控制着霍尔木兹海峡西岸的大量高地、洞库和关键岛屿,如霍尔木兹岛、法尔斯岛、拉克岛等,一旦下令封锁,可以立刻建立起一套“分层火力封锁网”。

历史上,伊朗曾多次威胁封锁霍尔木兹海峡,但均未真正实施。例如,在 20 世纪两伊战争期间,伊朗虽曾威胁封锁,但最终并未完全落实。近年来,在美国退出伊核协议并恢复对伊制裁后,伊朗也曾多次发出类似威胁。

伊朗经济严重依赖霍尔木兹海峡对外出口能源。如果关闭海峡,伊朗经济将遭受重创,民众生活将更加困难,可能加速政权的合法性危机。此外,封锁海峡将严重恶化伊朗的对外关系,使其在国际社会上更加孤立。

上海环太国际战略研究中心副理事长兼学术委员会主任刘强博士表示「如果伊朗是理性的,最终大概率不会通过封锁海峡的决定。封锁海峡对伊朗来说弊大于利,目前国际社会都倾向于同情伊朗,一旦实施封锁,只会引发各国反对,扭转对自己有利的国际舆论。」

美国副总统万斯表示「伊朗封锁霍尔木兹海峡的企图将对他们的经济带来自杀式的效果。在他看来,伊朗不太可能决定这么做。」

特朗普北京时间 6 月 23 日凌晨在其社交平台 Truth 表示,「使用「政权更迭」这个术语在政治上是欠妥的,但如果当前的伊朗政权无法让伊朗再次变得伟大,为什么不能发生一场政权更迭呢?MIGA」

伊朗究竟会做出何种抉择,市场在屏息以待。

加密圈一片哀嚎声,加密市场的牛市还在吗?现在适合抄底吗?

交易员 Eugene Ng Ah Sio 昨日晚 10 点在个人频道发文表示,「这里我相当积极地开了多单,包括比特币和一些山寨币。我认为,今天早些时候美国的轰炸行动,加上霍尔木兹海峡的关闭,是一次对早期多头的连续打击,已经足够洗盘,现在正是「逢低买入」的时候。如果市场直接跳空跌到 95,000 美元,那就只能说「晚安」了,但这是多头的最后一战,而我已经就位了。」

CryptoQuant 研究主管 Julio Moreno 表示,比特币需求在经历一段加速上涨、价格接近 112,000 美元之后,正在出现降温迹象。现货需求仍在增长,但增速已经放缓,目前低于历史趋势。巨鲸和 ETF 的比特币购买量已经减半。新增投资者的需求也在下降。在期货市场,投资者近期选择获利了结,并开始建立新的空头头寸。

如果需求持续疲软,比特币可能会在 92,000 美元附近寻得支撑,该价位对应交易者的链上实际成本价,是牛市期间的典型支撑区。如果此支撑失效,下一个支撑位可能在 81,000 美元,接近交易者链上实际成本价的下轨。

链上数据分析师 Murphy 则发推表示,ETH 价格虽然比高位已回调了近 20%,但仍然不认为这里是最佳的抄底位置。因为从盈利供应百分比数据能看到目前还是 55%,意味着即便是现在这个价格,仍有 55% 的流通筹码处于浮盈状态。从历史数据来看,只有当一大半的流通筹码都处于浮亏状态,才会是更具性价比的抄底时机。

Galaxy Digital 创始人 Mike Novogratz 发推表示,接下来的 72 小时至关重要,但如果伊朗没有真正的反击,到本周末市场将会大幅上涨。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

19 New Decacorns in Half a Year: Why is the Primary Market Chasing 'Certainty'?

In the first half of 2026, China’s primary market saw a notable increase in unicorns, adding 19 new companies each valued over 100 billion RMB, particularly in sectors like embodied AI and large language models (LLMs). Firms such as Galaxy General, Zibian, and ZhiPingFang even surpassed 200 billion RMB valuations within months. Moonshot AI's valuation surged from around $10 billion to $35 billion by July 2026, with a pre-IPO target of $50 billion. This concentration of capital into a few "certain" sectors highlights a market shift. The driving force is not a general abundance of capital but a chase for "certainty"—primarily clearer exit pathways like imminent IPOs. Companies with defined public listing timelines attract intense investment despite higher valuations, as they reduce exit uncertainty for investors. Secondary market valuations of listed peers also serve as new anchors, boosting the perceived value of private companies in similar fields, though this creates dependency on public market sentiment. Another form of certainty comes from the expectation of rising valuations in subsequent funding rounds. The investment logic has shifted in some cases from assessing long-term fundamental value to betting on the next round attracting higher prices. This dynamic is also seen in deep-tech areas like nuclear fusion, where firms like NeoFusion secured a 10.6 billion RMB valuation despite early commercial stages, driven by scarcity and strategic bets. However, this trend signals a risk transfer: technical uncertainties remain but are temporarily masked by valuation inflation. As valuations climb—50 billion to 200 billion or 500 billion RMB—companies face increasing pressure to demonstrate real revenue, profit, and sustainable business models. The danger lies not in the rise of unicorns itself, but if valuations become detached from value creation and rely merely on the expectation of future funding or exits. Ultimately, the surge reflects investors seeking perceived safety in shorter-term exit certainty and transactional momentum, rather than a renewed appetite for risk. The true test will come when the market inevitably refocuses on fundamentals, questioning how many of today’s high valuations are backed by genuine economic value.

marsbit4m ago

19 New Decacorns in Half a Year: Why is the Primary Market Chasing 'Certainty'?

marsbit4m ago

Just Now, Sam Altman Blasts Dario Amodei as 'Anti-Human', Secret Model Exposed the Same Day

Just now, Sam Altman strongly criticized Dario (Amodei, co-founder of Anthropic), denouncing his "doomsday marketing" as "anti-human dictator rhetoric." This came alongside the accidental exposure of OpenAI's next-generation model, codenamed "gpt-nathree," hinting at the imminent release of GPT-6 Astra. The leak occurred when an OpenAI employee's public GitHub commit mentioned the codename. Combined with previous leaks of "gpt-mewfour," it suggests these are iterative checkpoints for OpenAI's upcoming agent model, Astra. Astra is known for multi-agent collaboration and long-duration task handling, having reportedly solved previously unsolved mathematical problems. Meanwhile, two new Anthropic model codenames, "claude-marshmallow-eap" and "claude-melon-eap," were also exposed but are believed to be iterations of the Claude 5 series, not a new flagship. In a wide-ranging podcast interview, Altman admitted he was wrong about the speed of AI-driven disruption, acknowledging societal inertia slows adoption. He fiercely criticized rivals' marketing that simultaneously promises immense benefits (like curing cancer) and warns of existential risk, calling it a dangerous "benevolent dictator" narrative that seeks to concentrate power. He emphasized that people are the ultimate purpose of AI. Altman also revealed OpenAI's unconventional, consensus-defying path: spending four and a half years in the "dark" without a public product before ChatGPT's breakthrough, driven by scaling laws rather than early customer feedback. He concluded that even with superintelligent AI, genuine human connection will remain irreplaceably valuable.

marsbit44m ago

Just Now, Sam Altman Blasts Dario Amodei as 'Anti-Human', Secret Model Exposed the Same Day

marsbit44m ago

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbit1h ago

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片