索拉纳的关键 SIMD-228 提案未能通过验证者投票,令牌排放量不变

tokeninsight_newsPublished on 2025-03-14Last updated on 2025-03-15

Abstract

这一变化预计将通过将奖励分配正式转移到链上来增加透明度。

报道来自 The Block

Solana 最新的治理提案 SIMD-228 未能通过所需的 66.67% 的支持票。


SIMD-228 旨在通过引入基于质押参与的动态排放模型来减少 SOL 代币的通货膨胀。约 74% 的质押 SOL 参与了 SIMD-228 的投票,这被认为是历史上最大的加密治理投票之一。
Solana 的减通胀治理提案 SIMD-228 在创纪录的投票参与率下未能通过投票,投票于周四结束。


Solana 改进文档 228 提议重塑网络的代币经济,通过用动态市场基础系统替代固定的通胀计划,从而根据质押参与情况调整 SOL 代币的发行。


提案的排放模型旨在将 Solana 的通胀率降低到年化 1% 以下,当前的质押率约为 65%,而当前的固定通胀计划设定为每年 4.6%,每年减少 15%,直到稳定在 1.5%。


SIMD-228 的支持者认为,这有可能使 SOL 更加稀缺和有价值,从而使长期持有者受益,而反对者则认为,这可能会对小型质押者和验证者的盈利能力产生负面影响。


投票于 3 月 6 日开始,在 Solana Epoch 753 中进行,需获得 66.67% 的“是”票才能通过。投票在 Epoch 755 结束时,43.6% 的合格投票者投了“是”票,27.4% 投了“否”票,总体支持率为 61.4%。


“所以发行将保持现状,”Solana 开发平台 Helius Labs 的首席执行官 Mert Mumtaz 在 X 上表示。


SIMD-228 的投票参与率为 74%,高于过去 100 年中任何一次美国总统选举的参与率,Solana 在 X 上写道。2024 年的美国选举中,加密货币成为焦点,参与率约为 64%。


“SIMD-228 是有史以来最大的加密治理投票——无论是参与人数还是参与的市场资本,”SIMD-228 的共同作者、Multicoin Capital 的联合创始人 Tushar Jain 在 X 上发表帖子称。“这次投票证明了网络的繁荣与完全去中心化。”


另一方面,另一个治理提案 SIMD-123 在 Solana Epoch 755 结束时通过。SIMD-123 提议引入一种机制,允许验证者与其质押者分享部分收入,而目前一些验证者选择离线解决方案来激励质押者。该提案以近 75% 的支持票通过。


这一变化预计将通过将奖励分配正式转移到链上来增加透明度。


“SIMD-228 没有通过,但 123 通过了……尽管这两个提案都是为了减少验证者收入,”Solana Labs 的联合创始人 Anatoly Yakovenko 表示。“对 228 的反对并不是出于自利的动机。”

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

On July 4th, Doubao and Tongyi Qianwen announced the impending shutdown of their user-created "AI Agent" features. Doubao confirmed its agent feature will be taken offline on July 15, directing users to ByteDance's CatBox app for similar needs. On the same day, Tongyi Qianwen notified users, specifying that personalized interactive agents and user-built agent functions will cease on July 10, with all agent features and services completely deactivated by July 15. After this date, access to agent configurations and historical chat records will be lost. This adjustment impacts core user scenarios like role-playing, personal assistants, and vertical tool agents. The shutdown date coincides with the official implementation of China's "Interim Measures for the Administration of Artificial Intelligence Human-like Interactive Services" on July 15. The new regulations impose strict rules on "human-like emotional interaction services," requiring platforms to implement measures like anti-addiction systems, minor verification, and content moderation. This move is widely seen as a proactive step by the platforms to align with regulatory timelines and mitigate compliance risks. Additionally, commercial challenges are a key driver. Analysis suggests that casual, human-like chat agents generate high-frequency, low-value interactions, leading to high computational costs with poor monetization. As the AI application market shifts from user growth to proving value, sustaining such "high-cost, low-efficiency" user-generated content becomes difficult. Both platforms have outlined transition plans. Doubao will allow data viewing and self-backup for a period after shutdown, with data scheduled for permanent deletion by October 15. Tongyi Qianwen similarly advised users to save important content via copying or screenshots before the deadline. This strategic retreat from C-end agent features signals a broader market shift. Compliance capability and sustainable business models are replacing user scale and feature richness as the new core competitive dimensions. Tongyi Qianwen's recent move to fully open its Agent and Skill platforms to third-party enterprises and developers further underscores a strategic pivot from low-value C-end services to high-value B-end enterprise scenarios.

marsbit2h ago

Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

marsbit2h ago

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

In 2026, OpenAI's Codex saw explosive growth, with weekly active users surging over 5x to 5 million since January, driven largely by the February launch of its desktop app. Codex desktop lead Andrew Ambrosino explains key shifts behind its evolution. A core change is the inversion of development costs: implementation is now cheap, while curation and taste—judging which of many AI-generated prototypes is valuable—have become the new scarcities. Ambrosino defines taste as a blend of aesthetics, systems thinking, direction, and semantic coherence in interaction. He notes AI still struggles with design because evaluating it requires human cultural context and abstract reasoning about how components relate—capabilities beyond current models. Timing is critical: the same Codex app would have failed months earlier; success hinges on the model's capabilities at launch. Roles are blurring within his team, with engineers, designers, and PMs overlapping significantly. However, Ambrosino cautions against eliminating specialized roles entirely, as each field retains deep expertise. On AI-assisted development, the focus has shifted from measuring code written by AI to distinguishing between supervised and unsupervised generation. A current challenge is teaching models to simplify code, not just add complexity. The merger of Codex and ChatGPT stems from observed user behavior: non-developers adopted Codex for general knowledge work despite its developer-centric interface. This revealed a collapsing boundary between specialized tools and universal assistants. The vision is a "home base" that orchestrates tasks across external professional tools (like Excel or Premiere Pro) via connectors, rather than rebuilding everything internally. An internal example showed Codex helping edit video by interacting with Premiere Pro's files and even writing a plugin for it. The future direction is a unified, extensible platform that serves as a central hub for automating and managing work across any specialized tool the user employs.

marsbit2h ago

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片