黑暗即将结束?2025 年行情走势预测

Foresight NewsPublished on 2025-03-13Last updated on 2025-03-13

Abstract

黑暗即将结束,从 [化债和关税、衰退和降息、风险资产 or 避险资产、市场参与主体] 四个角度,谈谈 2025 年行情走势。

撰文:SANYUAN Labs

黑暗即将结束,从 [化债和关税、衰退和降息、风险资产 or 避险资产、市场参与主体] 四个角度,谈谈我对 2025 年行情走势的看法

BTC 测试 77000 支撑,以太跌破 2000 支撑,makerDAO 上的 2 个多亿 ETH 已经在危险的清算边缘,ETF 流出,屋漏偏逢连夜雨,测试网上的 Pectra 升级还被黑。市场在争论熊市陷阱还是牛市陷阱,未来看熊的人也越来越多,纳指单日跌幅 4%,这波炒衰退还在持续进行中,polymarket 上今年的衰退概率已经上升到了 40%。巧的是刚好 312,说点个人观点吧,给大家打点气∶

先说结论,我比较乐观:今年短期下跌压力较大,但看好后市。

1、化债和关税

众所周知,特朗普上台最大目的是化债,做法就是开源节流。

节流大家都知道,就是 DOGE。

开源方面,政府收入的重要渠道是:各类税收(大头)和非税收入(罚没收入、国有资产收益、服务收费、投资性收入)。过去几年的税收在 3–4 万亿左右,关税只占 1–2%,但是相比个人和企业税,关税是弹性较大的增长点,非税收入中,罚没和投资性收益也是弹性较大的增长点。可以看到特朗普天天喊着加关税,除了政府收入考虑外,主要是想给美国企业创造生长机会,也可以作为谈判筹码,即便最后不加了也是需要用其他利益交换的。

但是全球化时代,关税影响又是复杂的,有可能导致企业成本上升、供应链中断,传导消费端,引发通胀抬头,各国的对等关税也可能导致本国出口产品承压,金融市场观望情绪增加,衰退风险增加。所以很多人都认为特朗普的关税政策主要还是大棒作用,不论最终加不加关税,只要能够带来美国制造业的复苏,那相比关税本身来说,更值得。

2、衰退和降息

目前市场更多恐慌的是不确定性带来的衰退担忧,毕竟特朗普自己都说了会有过渡的阵痛期。但任何不确定性的事总有落地的一天,特朗普带来的不确定性自身也会逐渐被市场习惯,随着政策和数据逐渐清晰,未来不确定性恐慌会过去。衰退数据还能够成为降息的引信。

疫情的史诗级大放水需要更多时间消化,推后了这轮降息周期,也影响到了这轮 BTC 周期。对债台高筑的美国政府来说,降息是他们希望看到的,但是奈何通胀顽固。这里面除了之前大放水后遗症的因素,也有能源价格、供应链、人工成本等问题。

看最近的 2 月份数据,失业率略微上升,周三的 CPI 数据就成了关注焦点,如果 CPI 有下降趋势,则六月份降息的概率就更大了。回顾 2021 年的狂暴大牛市,起飞在了降息周期开始时,也结束在了加息脚步来临时前。衰退肯定不是特朗普政府想看到的,如果真的引起严重的衰退,那就是历史罪人了,但是温和去杠杆,挺过去他就会被历史铭记。所以特朗普政府更愿意看到的情况是:可控的衰退恐慌降低通胀率,紧接着继续开启降息。毕竟有胡佛的前车之鉴,不至于放任衰退的到来。另外,俄乌战争也有望今年停火。

因此,从衰退概率和降息周期来看,大概率不会直接走熊,来个深蹲倒是有可能。

3、风险资产 or 避险资产

如果从最近几年的表现来看,BTC 明显与纳斯达克指数有较高的相关性,市场仍然将其视为风险资产。但是随着美国战略储备的签署,以及越来越多机构开始将 BTC 作为资产配置,加剧的衰退风险导致避险需求增加,有可能增加市场对 BTC 避险资产属性的认同。

4、市场参与主体的变化

之前的 BTC 周期中,大多数贡献流动性的人是看到币圈赚钱效应而 FOMO 入场的人,新韭菜居多,但是随着市场的教育,老韭菜 / 新韭菜比例在逐步上升。而且随着 ETF 的通过以及合规性问题得到解决,机构资金就成了流动性大头。机构对待 BTC 的态度也不尽相同,有的可能把 BTC 当作科技股来炒,有的只是对冲策略的一部分而已,并且不太看得上众多的山寨币们,也有的机构将其作为资产配置的一个类型长期持有。

机构相比散户来说更不容易被市场情绪左右,且有较强的风险管理能力,其中不乏长期资本,是有助于缓解情绪带来的 BTC 波动的。

因此,在降息周期刚开始的当下,BTC 直接走熊到到 3,4 万的可能性并不高。甚至还有一种阴谋论的观点是,机构利用大家对过去周期经验的认同来制造走熊的势态,从而迫使低价交出筹码。

总之,我对未来走向的预测是 3–4 月震荡为主,不排除深蹲,5 月得看看数据,很大概率 6 月降息,下半年看好。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit2h ago

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit2h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit2h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit2h ago

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手2h ago

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

612 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片