盘点以凉兮为首的近期加密巨鲸的百倍杠杆生死局

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-03-04Last updated on 2025-03-05

Abstract

一念天堂,一念地狱。

原文作者:Fairy,ChainCatcher
原文编辑:TB,ChainCatcher


2 月 25 日起,比特币价格进入了剧烈的震荡模式,短短一周内经历了大幅“N 字形”波动,涨跌幅度超过 15% 。加密贪婪与恐惧指数持续处于“恐惧”区域,当散户在爆仓警报中惶恐不安时,顶级鲸鱼却嗅到了“血腥味”...


在这场市场博弈中,有人精准抄底逃顶,豪赚千万;有人押错方向,惨遭清算。谁在市场中翻云覆雨?又是谁在动荡中折戟沉沙?


本期盘点将深入分析近期市场上鲸鱼的神奇操作,解码加密巨鲸如何在合约修罗场中上演"刀尖舔血"的资本游戏。


百倍合约之凉兮战法:多空双撸 + 精准节奏


2 月 25 日,曾被称为“币圈毒瘤”的凉兮,用 2000 美元的本金短时间内赚到 100 万美元,其中在 Weex 获利 60 万 U,OKX 实盘获利 50 万 U。

百倍杠杆生死局:盘点近期加密巨鲸的疯狂博弈与豪赌


参考 X 用户@sunyangphp 的整理,凉兮的操作如下:
背景:ETH 在 2 月 25 日整体呈现宽幅震荡下行的走势,波动幅度较大。

  • 利用震荡行情多空双杀

“多空双撸”的策略,即在震荡行情中同时进行多单和空单操作,利用高杠杆(几十倍)放大收益。多次短线操作,吃到了震荡行情中的大部分波动利润。

  • 吃满最后一波暴跌,再反手抄底

抓住最终一波 ETH 暴跌全部跌幅,在最低点精准反手做多。

  • 关键时刻果断应变

在最后一波暴跌的过程中,市场出现了一次小幅反弹,凉兮最初误判趋势,反手做多,但迅速发现势头不对,果断改仓做空。


50 倍杠杆巨鲸:运气与市场时机实现惊险逆袭


3 月 2 日,在 Hyperliquid 上 50 倍杠杆做多 BTC 和 ETH 的巨鲸, 600 万 USDC 起始, 24 小时内实现了 683 万美元的利润。
鲸鱼地址:0xe4d31c2541A9cE596419879B1A46Ffc7cD202c62

百倍杠杆生死局:盘点近期加密巨鲸的疯狂博弈与豪赌


参考 @ai_ 9684 xtpa 的整理,操作如下:

  • 初始开仓: 600 万 USDC 本金, 50 倍杠杆

3 月 2 日,该巨鲸利用 50 倍杠杆开出了超过 2 亿美元的多头仓位,初始仓位包括 BTC 和 ETH 多单。

  • ETH: 49384 枚,开仓价 $ 2196 ,清算价 $ 2133.9 
  • BTC: 1260 枚,开仓价 $ 85671 ,清算价 $ 84629 
  • 加仓 ETH(此时浮亏 90 万美元)

晚上 10 点半左右,该鲸鱼选择加仓,增加了 914 枚 ETH 和 41 枚 BTC 的多头仓位。

  • 调整仓位:平掉部分 BTC,加仓 ETH

接近 11 点,该鲸鱼平掉了 469.48 枚 BTC 的多头仓位,转而大幅加仓 ETH。ETH 多头仓位增加到 88510 枚。

  • 市场转折:特朗普讲话推动上涨

11 点半,特朗普发表讲话,市场情绪迅速升温,BTC 突破 87000 美元,ETH 突破 2250 美元。该鲸鱼的仓位从浮亏转为浮盈,ETH 多单浮盈达到 646 万美元。

  • 逐步止盈

他首先将 88510 枚 ETH 多头仓位减少至 22570 枚,随后全部清仓。平掉 BTC 多头仓位, 831.57 枚 BTC 多头仓位近乎清仓。24 小时内获利 683 万美金。
(注:Coinbase 主管 Conor 发现该地址的资金来源于网络钓鱼,并且是 Roobet 的大额玩家)


巨鲸“先定 10 个大目标”:盈亏一瞬,刀尖起舞


ID 为“先定 10 个大目标”巨鲸曾最高浮盈 7 亿,不过最终梦一场。在最近的市场动荡中,这位巨鲸也上演了一系列高杠杆的极限操作。

百倍杠杆生死局:盘点近期加密巨鲸的疯狂博弈与豪赌


参考 @ai_ 9684 xtpa 的整理,操作如下:


1. 惨痛割肉
2 月 25 日,比特币价格一度跌至 89, 000 美元,巨鲸被迫以 89, 138 美元的均价割肉 1, 783.48 枚 BTC,总价值 1.59 亿美金,而其开仓均价高达 100, 320 美元。
随后,该巨鲸彻底平仓所有 5, 185 枚 BTC,整体损失 2, 432.68 万美金,但其声称部分盈利未被软件计入,总体本金仍然保持完好。
2.卷土重来,获利 1, 538 万美金
3 月 1 日,他以均价 83, 568.65 美元做多 1, 698 枚 BTC,价值 1.42 亿美元。最终,这笔多单在 3 月 3 日凌晨平仓,获利 1, 538 万美金。
3.反手做空,博弈市场回调
平仓后在六小时前又扭头开空,持有 2285 枚 BTC 的空单仓位(约 2.14 亿美金),保证金 5345 万美金,开仓均价 93729 美元。巨鲸在 90, 000 美元附近平仓止盈。
4.再度转向多单(已浮亏 1562 万美金)
止盈后迅速做多,同时加仓 ETH:

  • BTC:开仓均价 $ 90, 207 ,持仓 2, 069 枚
  • ETH:开仓均价 $ 2, 285 ,持仓 10, 800 枚
百倍杠杆生死局:盘点近期加密巨鲸的疯狂博弈与豪赌


一念天堂,一念地狱。无论是从 2000 美元做到 100 万美元的凉兮,还是 50 倍杠杆豪赌市场的鲸鱼,亦或是曾浮盈 7 亿美元但最终梦一场的“先定 10 个大目标”,他们的交易策略都充满了戏剧性。
每一次开仓平仓都可能是命运的分水岭。他们的故事既是对交易策略的极限演绎,也是对市场心理与资金管理的终极考验。市场永远充满机会,唯有时刻敬畏市场之人,方能在暴富传说与归零悲剧的夹缝中,觅得一线生机。


风险提示


本文盘点的鲸鱼交易案例,包含高杠杆、高频交易等激进策略,这些操作虽能在极端行情下带来巨大收益,但同样伴随着极高的风险。建议投资者根据自身风险承受能力谨慎操作,合理控制仓位,避免因市场情绪波动而做出冲动决策。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit29m ago

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit29m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit33m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit33m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit34m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit34m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit39m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

617 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片