Комиссия Ethereum составляет $0,41 — это минимум за 2 года: анализ влияния на цену ETH

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2023-02-19Last updated on 2025-02-19

  • Комиссия за транзакции в сети Ethereum снизилась до 0,41 доллара, что свидетельствует о снижении загруженности сети.
  • Низкие комиссии могут привлечь новых покупателей, поскольку транзакционные издержки станут более доступными.
  • Увеличение лимита газа Ethereum направлено на снижение комиссий и поддержку большего объема транзакций.

Данные аналитической блокчейн-платформы Santiment показывают, что комиссии за транзакции Ethereum упали до $0,41, что является огромным снижением по сравнению с максимумом в $15,21, наблюдавшимся в течение последних двух лет. Данные, предоставленные через их учетную запись X, показывают, что сеть обычно не испытывает большой перегрузки, когда комиссии за транзакции низкие.

💸 The average fee of an Ethereum transfer currently sits at just $0.41, in contrast to the $15.21 high point of the past 2 years. When Ethereum transaction fees are low, it usually means the network is not overly crowded. When users are not paying high prices to move their ETH… pic.twitter.com/G22qd3eTl8

— Santiment (@santimentfeed) February 19, 2025

Низкие комиссии Ethereum: признак возможности покупки?

Кроме того, низкие комиссии часто совпадают с периодами ценовой стагнации или медвежьих настроений, что может означать возможную возможность выхода на рынок новых покупателей.

Эти сдвиги могут сигнализировать об изменении динамики рынка, поскольку низкие транзакционные издержки обычно приводят к увеличению использования сети. Текущее падение комиссий говорит о том, что меньше пользователей часто взаимодействуют с Ethereum или инфраструктура сети функционирует более эффективно.

В такие моменты участники рынка часто считают цену Ethereum «низкой», что создает благоприятные условия для выхода на рынок новых покупателей без бремени высоких транзакционных издержек.

Высокие комиссии Ethereum: признак высокого спроса, но сдерживающий фактор для пользователей

Однако более высокие сборы обычно связаны с всплеском сетевой активности, часто связанной с ростом цен. Хотя высокие сборы могут указывать на высокий спрос на транзакции и приложения на базе Ethereum, они также могут отпугивать пользователей из-за возросшей стоимости сети.

По теме: Виталик Бутерин описал будущее Ethereum с достижениями уровня 2

Это падение ставит вопрос о том, сможет ли Ethereum подготовиться к новому росту цен, особенно сейчас, когда рынок вступает в фазу консолидации.

Ethereum увеличивает лимит газа, чтобы сократить транзакционные издержки

Избиратели Ethereum решили увеличить лимит газа до более чем 30 миллионов, чтобы еще больше решить проблему транзакционных издержек. Лимит газа ограничивает максимальный объем вычислительных ресурсов, потребляемых всеми транзакциями в блоке.

🚀以太坊 Gas Limit 首次在 PoS 時代提升，超過 3350 萬

今日是以太坊在過渡至 PoS 後，首次提升 Gas Limit 至超過 3350 萬，超過 52% 的驗證者支持這項變更，提高了以太坊的吞吐量。

Gas Limit 是指區塊能夠包含的最大 Gas… https://t.co/oWGpk6ReqI

— 動區動趨 BlockTempo (@BlockTempo) February 4, 2025

Повышая этот лимит, Ethereum может обрабатывать больше транзакций на блок, уменьшая перегрузку сети и снижая комиссии за транзакции по мере роста спроса на сеть. Лимит газа Ethereum уже достиг 35,9 миллионов за последние 24 часа, что означает, что сеть готова принять большую активность без повышения комиссий.

Связанный: Сетевая база Ethereum Layer 2 побьет рекорды с огромным ростом в 2024 году

Технические данные Ethereum показывают смешанные сигналы

С точки зрения технического анализа MACD показывает медвежий прогноз для Ethereum, при этом линия MACD расположена выше сигнальной линии. Такая компоновка предполагает возможное ослабление восходящего импульса, а гистограмма дополнительно подтверждает эту точку зрения с помощью столбцов ниже нулевой линии.


Источник: TradingView

Тем временем RSI приближается к зоне перепроданности на уровне 39,72, что предполагает отскок цены, если Ethereum превысит отметку 30.

Related Reads

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit7m ago

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit7m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit8m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit8m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit38m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit38m ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn41m ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn41m ago

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

The Blockchain Association, along with 160 former national security and law enforcement officials, has urged Senate leaders to pass the CLARITY Act. They argue that without clear federal regulation, crypto activity will move to opaque offshore markets, hindering U.S. efforts to combat financial crime. The letter highlights that the Act would strengthen law enforcement by expanding anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act, improving information sharing between agencies like the Treasury, DOJ, and FBI, and enhancing oversight of digital asset kiosks with measures like transaction monitoring and fraud prevention. The Association emphasizes these are enforcement enhancements, not deregulation. Momentum for the bill is building, with a Senate vote expected this summer, though it would still need reconciliation with a previously passed House version.

bitcoinist48m ago

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

bitcoinist48m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions