Michael Saylor Says It Has Become Impossible to Adopt the Bitcoin Update He Opposed!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-01Last updated on 2026-08-01

Abstract

Michael Saylor stated that it has become mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to achieve the 55% voluntary support threshold within the current Bitcoin mining difficulty adjustment cycle. Based on his analysis of 946 blocks generated up to block 960,561, only 24 blocks contained version field signals supporting BIP-110. Saylor claims all these signals came from DATUM miners sharing rewards via the OCEAN mining pool, with no supporting signals from non-OCEAN miners. He argues this situation prevents BIP-110 from reaching the required consensus level and that the current signals do not represent broad miner agreement. BIP-110 is a proposal aimed at making it more difficult to embed large data like images or text into the Bitcoin network, beyond simple monetary transactions. Its proponents argue Bitcoin should be used primarily for sending money to avoid network congestion. Saylor opposes this, believing the Bitcoin network should not dictate which transactions are necessary and that rules shouldn't change based on the preferences of a few. He also suggests that high support metrics may be inflated by automated signaling software rather than reflecting genuine miner consensus.

Michael Saylor explained that it is mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to reach the 55% voluntary support threshold in the current Bitcoin mining difficulty cycle.

According to data provided by Saylor, a total of 946 blocks have been generated during the current difficulty adjustment period, up to block number 960,561. Only in 24 of these blocks was the BIP-110 support signal added to the version field in the block header.

Saylor stated that all blocks sending signals were created by DATUM miners, who share their rewards through the OCEAN mining pool, and that no support signals have been received from miners outside of OCEAN.

Saylor stated that due to this situation, BIP-110 will not achieve the 55% voluntary support level in the cycle under consideration, arguing that the current signals cannot be considered a general consensus among miners.

What is BIP-110, and why does Saylor oppose it?

BIP-110 is a proposal aimed at making it more difficult to add photos, text, or other types of large data to the Bitcoin network, besides monetary transfers. Simply put, its proponents argue: 'Bitcoin should only be used for sending money; unnecessary data should not clog the network.' Michael Saylor opposes this.

According to him, the Bitcoin network should not decide which transactions are necessary and which are not, and the rules should not be changed at the whim of a few people. Saylor also claims that the high support figures do not reflect genuine miner support; rather, the numbers appear higher than they actually are because some software automated the signaling process.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat did Michael Saylor claim regarding the mathematical feasibility of BIP-110 adoption?

AMichael Saylor explained that it is mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to reach the 55% voluntary support threshold within the current Bitcoin mining difficulty adjustment cycle.

QAccording to Saylor, which mining entity signaled support for BIP-110, and through which pool?

ASaylor stated that all the blocks containing signals of support were produced by DATUM miners, who share their rewards through the OCEAN mining pool.

QWhat is the primary objective of the BIP-110 proposal as described in the article?

ABIP-110 is a proposal aiming to make it more difficult to add photos, text, or other large data types into the Bitcoin network beyond monetary transfers, with its proponents arguing that Bitcoin should be used only for sending money.

QWhy does Michael Saylor oppose the BIP-110 proposal?

ASaylor opposes it because he believes the Bitcoin network should not decide which transactions are necessary and which are not, and rules should not be changed at the whim of a few people. He also argues that the high support numbers may not reflect genuine miner support but could be inflated by automated signaling software.

QBased on the provided data, how many of the recent 946 blocks (up to block 960,561) contained signals supporting BIP-110?

AOnly 24 out of the 946 blocks generated during that period had a version field in the block header signaling support for BIP-110.

Related Reads

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片