Shiba Inu Burn Portal:SHIB 什么时候会达到 0.01 美元吗?

金色财经Published on 2024-08-26Last updated on 2024-08-26

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdingyue.ws.126.net%2F2024%2F0826%2F53c20c8dj00sit0320088d000fa008qp.jpg&thumbnail=660x2147483647&quality=80&type=jpg

Shiba Inu (SHIB) 刚刚推出了新的销毁门户。这引发了人们对该代币未来的新兴趣。新工具名为 ShibTorch,旨在减少 SHIB 的供应量。它重新引发了有关可能的价格变动的讨论。许多人想知道 SHIB 能否达到 0.01 美元的关口。

分析 SHIB 的 Burn Portal、价格预测和市场影响

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdingyue.ws.126.net%2F2024%2F0826%2F47300facj00sit03b002gd000sg00g9m.jpg&thumbnail=660x2147483647&quality=80&type=jpg

ShibTorch:新的柴犬烧伤门户

Shiba Inu 团队为 Shibarium 网络引入了ShibTorch。这一消息让 SHIB 社区兴奋不已。它解决了代币的主要问题之一:供应量大。

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdingyue.ws.126.net%2F2024%2F0826%2Fec52cd9aj00sit044000yd000a30097p.jpg&thumbnail=660x2147483647&quality=80&type=jpg

ShibTorch 以一种简单的方式销毁 SHIB 代币。它使用每笔 Shibarium 交易费的一部分。随着时间的推移,这一过程应该会减少总供应量。这可能会影响代币的价值。

当前资金消耗速度和社区期望

ShibTorch 很活跃,但早期成果并不显著。到目前为止,已销毁约 326 万枚 SHIB 代币。这一数字低于一些社区成员的预期。

销毁门户的成功取决于有多少人使用 Shibarium。更多的网络活动将导致更高的销毁率。目前,每日销毁率仅为 98,136 SHIB。这表明 Shibarium 需要更多用户来加快代币减少速度。

迈向 0.01 美元之路:分析SHIB 的供应减少

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdingyue.ws.126.net%2F2024%2F0826%2Ff7bf6beej00sit04p0030d000lc00atp.jpg&thumbnail=660x2147483647&quality=80&type=jpg

Shiba Inu 要达到 0.01 美元,其供应量必须大幅下降。一些社区成员希望每年通过 Shibarium 销毁 100 万亿 SHIB。

让我们看看这是如何实现的:

  • 目前供应量:583万亿SHIB

  • 每年目标销毁量:100万亿SHIB

  • 5年后供应量:83万亿SHIB

在供应量较低的情况下,0.01 美元的价格将使 Shiba Inu 的价值达到 8300 亿美元。这将超过以太坊的当前价值。这表明 SHIB 达到如此高的价格有多么困难。

达到 0.01 美元的潜在时间表

鉴于目前的情况,SHIB 达到 0.01 美元的路还很长。即使每年销毁 100 万亿枚代币,也需要大约六年的时间才能减少足够的供应量。这可能使 0.01 美元的价格更有可能实现。

如果供应量下降到 33 万亿代币左右,0.01 美元的价格意味着 3300 亿美元的市值。这仍然很高,但更接近顶级加密货币的价值。

总之,ShibTorch 对 Shiba Inu 来说是一大进步。然而,达到 0.01 美元仍然是一个复杂而长期的目标。burn 门户的成功将取决于未来几年有多少人使用 Shibarium。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, explains the recent Bitcoin price drop below $60,000 and its connection to the steep decline in MicroStrategy's STRC (Strategy's Perpetual Preferred Stock). STRC, designed as a high-yield, stable-price instrument, fell from its $100 target to $75 due to market fears over MicroStrategy's ability to sustain its dividend amid Bitcoin's price weakness. Hougan clarifies that while MicroStrategy's overall financial position remains strong, with significant Bitcoin holdings and cash, the core market anxiety centered on the optional nature of the dividend payments. In response, MicroStrategy announced a new operational framework: it will sell some Bitcoin as needed to fund dividends, will no longer actively defend the $100 share price through dividend hikes, and may repurchase STRC on the open market. This shift marks a change in MicroStrategy's role from a consistent, one-way buyer of Bitcoin to a more dynamic participant that may both buy and sell. According to Hougan, the STRC volatility is a classic late-cycle event, signaling the painful but necessary process of flushing out excessive leverage from the market. He draws parallels to the unwinding of the GBTC premium in the previous cycle. He identifies key potential bottoming signals: MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), extreme readings on the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, and persistently negative Bitcoin funding rates. Hougan concludes that while the exact timing of the market bottom is unpredictable, the current deleveraging phase suggests it is near. He expresses confidence that a new bull market will begin in the fall of this year, with the next major wave of buying expected to come from institutional investors like banks, asset managers, and pension funds.

Foresight News13m ago

Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Foresight News13m ago

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

On June 29th, the ENS community entered the on-chain voting phase for a proposal to renew the ENS DAO Security Council's veto power for two more years. Shortly after voting began, ENS founder Nick Johnson used his substantial ENS holdings to cast over 3.55 million votes against the proposal, swinging the outcome despite initial strong support. The Security Council was established in July 2024 with a 4/8 multisig veto power to protect the DAO's treasury (valued over $350 million) from malicious proposals during a period of low voter participation. Its powers were limited to vetoing only harmful proposals, not normal ones. Nick Johnson's opposition stems from broader concerns about ENS DAO's governance. In late 2025, he and others expressed frustration that the DAO had become mired in political gamesmanship, with capable contributors leaving and leadership falling to less experienced or misaligned parties. This context set the stage for a major restructuring proposal by ENS COO Katherine Wu on June 19th, titled "Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation." The controversial proposal aims to transfer daily operations, treasury management, and long-term strategy to a restructured ENS Foundation with a professional board, while the DAO would retain core protocol governance powers. Critics, including original ENS constitution author Brantly Millegan, argue this effectively transfers treasury control from token holders to ENS Labs (the core development team), undermining the DAO's original decentralized design. Nick's massive "no" vote on the Security Council renewal is seen as the first move in this power struggle. He explained his vote was due to concerns about insufficient checks on the Council's power and the potential for its veto to be used politically. In response, Katherine Wu submitted a revised proposal with higher execution thresholds (5/8 instead of 4/8) and stricter limits. The push for change comes as ENS's annual revenue has declined significantly, from over $10 million in 2023 to under $2 million in 2025, increasing pressure to manage the treasury more effectively. Nick Johnson now faces the challenge of proving that a more structured foundation can steer ENS better than the current DAO model.

Foresight News43m ago

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

Foresight News43m ago

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

AI performance in predicting the 2026 FIFA World Cup knockout matches varied significantly, according to an analysis of models including ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude. The standout predictions came from DeepSeek and Gemini for the Netherlands vs. Morocco match. Gemini precisely forecasted a 1-1 draw and a penalty shootout win for Morocco, while DeepSeek correctly identified the high probability of a draw and Morocco's potential to advance via a defensive and counter-attacking strategy. Grok and Tongyi Qianwen (千问) demonstrated strength in predicting accurate scores for matches with clearer favorites. They correctly called the narrow 1-0 win for Canada over South Africa and Brazil's 2-1 victory over Japan, as well as Norway's 2-1 win over Ivory Coast. ChatGPT and Claude excelled more in match process analysis than in predicting exact scores or upsets. They frequently identified potential challenges for favorites, such as Japan's pressing against Brazil or DR Congo's defensive tactics against England, even when predicting the favorite's ultimate victory. A notable failure was the unanimous misjudgment of Germany vs. Paraguay. All models incorrectly favored Germany, underestimating Paraguay's ability to force a penalty shootout and cause an upset. In summary, Gemini and DeepSeek showed the most insight for high-stakes, unpredictable matches. Grok and Qianwen were reliable "score predictors" for less volatile games. ChatGPT and Claude were strong "analytical models," adept at outlining match dynamics but often hesitant to predict upsets.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Quiz for Portal

HTX Learn: Learn About “Portal” to Earn PORTAL Tokens

16.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.26Updated 2024.03.26

Quiz for Portal

How to Buy PORTAL

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing PORTAL (PORTAL) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy PORTAL (PORTAL) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your PORTAL (PORTAL)After purchasing your PORTAL (PORTAL), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade PORTAL (PORTAL)Easily trade PORTAL (PORTAL) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy PORTAL

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PORTAL (PORTAL) are presented below.

活动图片