加密市场爆仓超 2 亿美元,闪跌背后的原因有哪些?

深潮Published on 2024-08-16Last updated on 2024-08-16

加密和股市「冰火两重天」,杠杆多头 BTC 期货和稳定币需求下降,或导致比特币价格下跌。

撰文:Felix,PANews

昨夜,连续几天平静的价格走势突然结束,比特币和以太坊等加密货币价格突然下跌,其中比特币跌至 8 月初市场恐慌以来的最低水平,最低逼近 5.6 万美元。此次下跌引发新一波加密头寸清算潮(主要是多头头寸),市场普遍转红。

据 Coinglass 数据,过去 24 小时内(统计时间为 8 月 16 日 11:30)的清算额达 2.22 亿美元,其中多头头寸爆仓 1.75 亿美元,1.61 亿美元发生在过去 12 小时内。比特币是清算额最高的代币,过去一天清算额超过 7900 万美元,其次是以太坊,清算额约为 7000 万美元。

目前市场有所回升,比特币交易价格在 5.8 万美元浮动,以太坊交易价格在 2580 美元浮动,SOL 在 140 美元浮动。

杠杆多头 BTC 期货和稳定币需求下降或为下跌原因

就目前而言,迅速下跌似乎没有明显的原因。在周三晚间最新的消费者价格指数(CPI)报告发布后,美股飙升,而比特币和以太坊价格波动较大,说明此次的下跌似乎与宏观经济因素无关。有部分观点认为杠杆多头 BTC 期货和稳定币的需求下降,导致比特币价格下跌。

自 8 月 8 日以来,比特币一直处于窄幅区间,无法突破 6.2 万美元,同时巩固了 5.8 万美元的支撑位。这种盘整反映了交易员的不确定性日益增加,尤其是当 BTC 期货资金费率仍为负时,这表明买家的需求杠杆较低。

此外,8 月 15 日,USDT 在中国的交易价格下跌 0.2%,创下了该指标三个月来的最低水平,表明对加密货币的需求减少。这与 8 月 6 日相比发生了显著变化,当时交易员为 USDT 支付了 2% 的溢价。

根据 BTC 衍生品指标和中国的稳定币需求,比特币要想重新夺回 6.2 万美元的支撑位,难度很大。然而,历史数据表明,散户交易者通常会对市场走势做出反应,而不是预测市场走势,因此不能完全排除突破的可能性。

分析师看跌以太坊

巧合的是,在市场骤跌之前,就有部分分析师看空以太坊,甚至认为可能触及 1,600 美元附近的新低。

Arete Capital 合伙人 McKenna 在 8 月 15 日的 X 帖子中写道:「我并不认为 ETH 会突破 2800-2900 美元,而是预计会在 8 月和 9 月的部分时间保持区间波动。」

与此同时,分析师 Peter Brandt 表示,基于两种图表模式,ETH 的价格走势呈现出两种情景:5 个月矩形和上升楔形。第一种情况是,ETH 升至 2,960 美元以上。第二种情况是,上升楔形的崩盘继续下行趋势,ETH 跌至 1,650 美元,这是矩形的看跌目标。

比特币出现「看跌交叉」

匿名加密货币交易员 Mags 在 X 帖子中写道:「比特币日线图上出现看跌交叉,50 日均线跌破 200 日均线,预示市场短期疲软」。这是自 15,500 美元触底以来的第二次看跌交叉。上一次看跌交叉是在 2023 年 9 月,当时价格在 2.5 万美元左右。此后,价格横盘整理了几周,然后收回 MA,导致看涨交叉和强劲的上行反弹。

IG 市场分析师 Tony Sycamore 补充道:「比特币需要收回 200 日移动均线才能稳定下来,并开启对 70,000 美元附近趋势通道阻力的测试。」

然而,交易员 Mags 表示,死亡交叉实际上可能是一个好兆头。 当这种情况在过去发生时,比特币的价格在四个月后两次都上涨了约 50%。

2023 年 9 月,比特币 50 日均线跌破 200 日均线,当时其价格为 26,578 美元。仅仅四个月后,其价格上涨了 49%,至 39,518 美元。

2021 年 7 月,50 日均线为 34,671 美元,而 200 日均线为 44,680 美元。同样,在交叉后仅四个月,比特币的价格就上涨了 54%,至 54,813 美元。

尽管市场下行,但利好因素也不断

当下,多头对近期走势感到沮丧是可以理解的,因为积极的催化剂不断涌现,但价格却没有做出反应。

首先利好的催化剂是美股反弹。股市反弹在一定程度上可以归因于现在几乎可以肯定的美联储宽松周期。两周多以来,短期利率市场已经将美联储首次降息将于 9 月到来的可能性定为 100%。尽管过去的货币宽松政策已被证明对加密货币有利,但价格在本轮周期中迄今为止尚未做出反应。

此外,美国 7 月份通胀率降至 2.9%,创下 2021 年以来年度通胀率最低纪录。与此同时,Morningstar 首席美国经济学家 Preston Caldwell 周四在一份声明中表示,多位分析师预测,美联储将从 9 月开始推出「激进」的降息措施,刺激美国经济。

美国市场最近也表现强劲,纳斯达克综合指数在过去 24 小时内上涨 2.34%,而标准普尔 500 指数和道琼斯工业平均指数分别上涨约 1.61% 和 1.39%。纳斯达克指数和标准普尔 500 指数现在都回到了 8 月初恐慌之前的水平。

另一个看似积极的催化剂是机构对比特币的采用速度加快。ETF Store 总裁 Nate Geraci 表示,最新一批 13F 文件(截至 6 月 30 日)显示,现货比特币 ETF 的机构持有者有 1,924 家。Geraci 指出,尽管 4 月至 6 月期间比特币价格下跌,但这一数字仍高于第一季度的 1,479 家。

另一方面,愿意利用资本市场来增加比特币持有量的上市公司也在增加。Marathon Digital(MARA,已经从事比特币挖矿业务)本周筹集了 3 亿美元的可转换债券,并立即用这笔资金以每枚约 5.9 万美元的价格购买了 4,000 多个比特币。医疗设备制造商 Semler Scientific(SMLR,几个月前宣布了其比特币资金计划)本周获得了美国 SEC 的批准,继续进行超过 1.5 亿美元的融资,所得款项将用于购买更多比特币。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit5m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit5m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit12m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit12m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News13m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News13m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

463 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片