下跌期间抄底这4种加密货币,牛市爆发100倍潜力!

币界网Published on 2024-08-16Last updated on 2024-08-16

币界网报道:

e75fe54dbf76c82a259a3744951ac98b.jpeg

加密货币价格波动了一段时间,市场整体情绪看跌。比特币(BTC)正在努力回到 60,000 美元以上,而以太坊(ETH)则努力稳定在 2,700 美元。

然而,识别下一个爆发的加密货币可能需要一些工作,因为大多数基金都被抽水资产所吸引。今天的文章探讨了过去 24 小时内占据涨幅榜首位的加密货币的表现。目的是识别具有一定潜力的代币,并向投资者和交易者介绍每种代币。

下一个爆发的加密货币

T

Threshold Network 提供专为 dApp 设计的高级加密工具。这些工具解决了关键的隐私、安全和互操作性挑战。用户可以享受代理重新加密 (PRE)、阈值签名 (TSS)、随机信标 (RB) 和分布式密钥生成 (DKG) 等功能。这些工具共同实现了安全的跨链交互、安全的数据共享和对用户数据的受控访问

短期来看,Threshold 在过去 24 小时内上涨了 6.25%,过去一周上涨了 28.34%。其相对强弱指数 (RSI) 为 53.61,表现不俗,且该代币的交易价格高于其 200 天简单移动平均线 (SMA),表明其势头良好。在过去 30 天中,Threshold 有 11 个交易日上涨,有望成为一项有盈利潜力的投资。

fa12e437d30e02a0cdb77d75dde43db3.png

Threshold 的一个关键应用是 tBTC。tBTC 是比特币的代币化版本,无需托管即可运行,允许持有者私下使用 DeFi,且审查风险较低。T 代币在质押和节点操作中也发挥着重要作用,这对于网络的效率和安全性至关重要。

此外,Threshold 的安全性依赖于阈值加密和签名方案。它还支持 Sepolia 等网络上的跨链项目,确保区块链之间的顺畅交互。除了 tBTC,Threshold 还支持 RandomBeacon 和 Threshold Autonomous Credentials (TACo) 应用程序等应用程序来扩展其生态系统。

EUL

今年 8 月,EUL 的网络活动和社交参与度显著增加。日线图、周线图和月线图分别显示 4.64%、44.42% 和 13.57% 的惊人涨幅。此外,该山寨币在过去一年中飙升了 106.06%,表现优于 75% 的顶级加密资产。这一增长反映了投资者的强烈信心和对该货币的乐观前景。

6f4f7d3f1126dda5094754a58b8024eb.png

此外,Euler 还拨款 400 万美元来增强其即将推出的 v2 平台的安全性。在 Euler DAO 的支持下,该计划包括广泛的代码审计和引入模块化架构以最大限度地降低风险。v2 平台计划于 2024 年第二季度发布,将采用模块化设计,包括 Euler Price Oracle、Euler Vault Kit (EVK) 和 Ethereum Vault Connector (EVC) 等组件。这些元素旨在为用户在创建借贷市场时提供更大的灵活性。

除了这些安全措施外,Euler Labs 还组织了一场全球代码审计竞赛,为发现 v2 代码库中的漏洞的人员提供 125 万美元的奖励。竞赛吸引了 600 多名参与者,未发现任何高或中等严重程度的问题。这凸显了该协议致力于为其用户创建安全平台的承诺。

随着 Euler v2 的发布临近,开发人员的目标是重建人们对该平台的信任,并为 DeFi 领域的安全性树立新的标准。此次升级将为用户提供更大的灵活性,以创建自定义借贷市场和策略。

BICO

Biconomy 是一家中心化加密货币交易所,提供现货和期货交易,采用固定费用结构。该平台支持美元、欧元、英镑、卢布、哈萨克斯坦索莫尼、乌克兰格里夫纳和巴西雷亚尔等货币的法定存款。用户可以交易 100 多种加密货币,包括比特币、以太坊、BCH、LTC、TUSD、XRP、ADA、SOL 和 BIT。

Biconomy 还推出了一款名为 Biconomy Earn 的生息产品,让用户可以从其数字资产中赚取利息。截至发稿时,BICO 代币价格为每枚 0.2218美元。这一价格反映出过去 24 小时内上涨了 5.06%,过去一周上涨了 5.70%。此外,BICO 的交易价格比其 200 天简单移动平均线 (SMA) 0.26812 美元高出 9.88%,同时比其周期高点低 0.96%,比其周期低点高出 29.82%。

03d96a5279caf6536472b166acf71811.png

然而,14 天相对强弱指数 (RSI) 为 79.08,表明可能很快出现下跌。在过去 30 天中,BICO 经历了 15 个绿色日和 10.31% 的高波动性,表明价格走势不可预测。

Biconomy 独特的中继器网络解决了常见的区块链挑战,可在 Curve Finance、Perpetual Protocol、Decentral Games 和 Sapien Network 等平台上实现无 gas 交易。这些交易的安全性通过 Quantstamp、MixBytes、Certik 和 Holborn 进行的审计得到保证。

此外,Biconomy 还为开发人员提供了易于集成的软件开发工具包 (SDK)。用户使用私钥签署交易,使平台保持非托管和无需信任的状态。Biconomy 的多链中继协议还增强了去中心化应用程序 (DApps) 的用户体验。该项目旨在使 Web3 产品像 Web2 一样用户友好,努力克服 Web3 技术目前面临的限制。

FLR

Flare 是利用以太坊虚拟机 (EVM) 来增强区块链功能的一层区块链。它旨在让开发人员能够以去中心化的方式访问来自各种区块链和互联网的可靠数据。这种访问方式为创建应用程序和货币化机会开辟了新的可能性。

此外,Flare 还允许去中心化应用程序 (dApp) 通过一次部署支持多个区块链。Flare 最近与 Stargate Finance 整合,实现了超过 25 个区块链之间的顺畅流动性转移,包括以太坊、Arbitrum、Optimism 和 Base。Stargate V2 的 Hydra 功能有助于将 USDC、USDT 和 ETH 轻松转移到 Flare。

df13e0962ccb899a3c371ff1969da919.png

这些资产可以在 Flare 上的 dApp 和协议中使用。同时,原始资产仍保留在源链上的原生资产池中,而等值的 Hydra 资产则在 Flare 上创建。用户可以随时通过 Stargate 将这些 Hydra 资产兑换为原始资产,从而确保所有连接链上的统一流动性。

此外,Stargate V2 集成与 Flare 上推出的一项重大 DeFi 激励计划相一致。该计划旨在增加稳定币流动性,并为 Flare 即将推出的 FAssets 系统奠定坚实的基础,该系统将支持非智能合约链的 DeFi。将他们的 USDC 和 USDT 桥接到 Flare 并为选定的去中心化交易所 (DEX) 池做出贡献的 Stargate V2 用户将受益于有竞争力的奖励率。

截至今日,Flare 的价格为 0.01512 美元,在过去 24 小时内下跌了 2.63%。CoinCodex 的技术分析表明,Flare 未来可能在 0.018926 美元至 0.089576 美元之间交易。如果达到上限目标,FLR 可能会成为下一个经历显着增长的加密货币。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbit6m ago

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbit6m ago

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight News12m ago

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight News12m ago

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbit28m ago

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbit28m ago

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbit34m ago

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbit34m ago

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton filed for two ETFs on June 18 that embed a "default option" logic into Bitcoin investing. These funds—the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovative Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF—aim to automatically allocate a portion of investor dividends to Bitcoin, initially with a 95% stock and 5% Bitcoin allocation. The mechanism is designed for financial advisors, not retail investors. By packaging Bitcoin exposure within a standard equity fund label, advisors can bypass internal compliance restrictions against direct cryptocurrency allocation for their clients. Dividends from the stock holdings are automatically used to buy Bitcoin via spot ETFs, futures, or options. However, the structure imposes strict rebalancing rules: if Bitcoin's allocation exceeds 5%, it is trimmed back to 4.5% quarterly, with a hard cap of 20%. This means the fund becomes a systematic seller during Bitcoin price rallies. Realistically, the potential buying pressure is minimal. Based on dividend yields (approximately 1.05% for broad market, 0.52% for innovative equity), the annual inflow into Bitcoin would be a tiny fraction of the fund's assets. For comparison, Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF ($359 million AUM) would generate only about $3.6 million in annual Bitcoin purchases—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. The innovative equity fund, heavily weighted in low-dividend stocks like Nvidia, would have even weaker buying power. The product utilizes an offshore Cayman subsidiary to hold Bitcoin, a common compliance tactic for commodity exposure in mutual funds. A key drawback for investors is the tax liability: they must pay taxes on dividends that are automatically converted into Bitcoin, requiring out-of-pocket cash for a gain they never directly receive. For the strategy to scale significantly, such funds would need to become a default or near-default option in retirement plans like 401(k)s. Recent regulatory moves, including a Trump executive order and a Department of Labor proposal offering fiduciary safe harbors for including crypto assets, could pave the way. However, widespread employer adoption likely awaits further legal clarity. Ultimately, the fund's model leverages investor inertia and automated systems, rather than convincing anyone to actively choose Bitcoin. While it creates a new, albeit small, structural buyer, its rebalancing rules also establish a built-in "selling ceiling" that could dampen price upside if similar products proliferate.

Foresight News36m ago

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Foresight News36m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

459 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片