市场复苏 、ETH有望达到 3,000 美元

币界网Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

以太坊价格有望重新测试 3,000 美元,每周以太坊 ETF 流入量转为正值

v2-02cd9c19b90b01c34502c7533ee69ec0_720w.webp

以太坊 ETF 已从周一的大幅下跌中反弹,尽管市场存在不确定性,但流入量仍转为正值。周二以太坊价格的回升表明看涨趋势正在形成,以太坊能否在 8 月达到 3,000 美元?

以太坊 ETF 每周流入量达 4900 万美元

在加密货币市场下滑期间,ETH 的网络活动十分活跃。以太坊的价格飙升超过 3%,达到每日最高 2,547 美元。截至发稿时,ETH 的交易价格为 2,521 美元,以太坊也受益于整体市场趋势。山寨币的市值已恢复至3000 亿美元,加密货币的交易价格为 2,500 美元及以上。尽管市场复苏,但投资者仍继续购买现货以太币交易所交易基金 [ETF],流入资金达 4,900 万美元。自 7 月推出以来表现惨淡的 ETH ETF 现已重回正轨,周一净流入量达到 4900 万美元。这比上周五的 5430 万美元总净流入量有了显著改善。

v2-06e7420e27730b473b9a7896381af6b1_720w.webp

对于 ETF 来说,继续获得正向资金流入至关重要,这将提振投资者士气并增加对 ETH 的需求,从而支持可持续的上升趋势。

在这其中,一个名为“7 Siblings”的团体利用最近的下跌,在此时购买了大量 ETH 代币。根据 Lookonchain 的数据,该实体当时秘密购买了 56,093 个 ETH,成本为 1.293 亿美元。根据区块链数据,7 Siblings 昨天以约 2,600 美元的价格开始囤积以太坊,并一直购买,直到价格跌至 2,191 美元。购买 56,093 个 ETH 的平均成本为 2,305 美元。

v2-76357b9982c229b596457f2b78f9e34f_720w.webp

累积狂潮持续了12个小时。该钱包利用Uniswap和1inch等多个平台将价值1.293亿美元的USDC[USDC]兑换成ETH。

以太坊价格突破 2,500 美元,下一步将如何?

在成功守住 2,100 美元的支撑位后,交易员,投资者和一些团体开始买入,推动ETH 价格反弹。资金流量指数 (MFI) 从超卖转入中性区域证实了这一势头转变,推动以太坊价格突破 2,500 美元。每日收盘价必须高于 2,500 美元,才能验证看涨论点至 3,000 美元,此时多头将决定稍事休息,然后再继续推高至 3,500 美元。

v2-ffa1f4c4579c448e903c92a80a78b106_720w.webp

IOMAP 模型显示在 2,292 美元至 2,368 美元之间有着强劲支撑,众多投资者押注持续上涨。目前阻力位正在下降,可能会持续上涨超过 3,000 美元。

v2-55d2780e1241362281f61abb791ca811_720w.webp

先前的ETH 价格预测证实,每日时间范围内的死亡交叉模式可能会使多头的情况复杂化,阻碍进一步上涨至 2,500 美元以上。随着在阻力位上挣扎可能会经历一段长期的盘整,因为它在任何上行走势中都会遇到巨大阻力。

简单来说

随着多头和空头的较量,以太坊网络受到近期下跌的严重影响。不过以太坊 ETF 实现每周净流入 4900 万美元,引发复苏希望。 目前ETH 维持在 2,292 美元至 2,368 美元之间的关键支撑位上方,说明前景看涨。期货未平仓合约增加,交易量也在支持以太币的上涨。

目前经济衰退担忧有所减弱,在市场复苏的情况下 ETH 有复苏上涨的希望,机构团队大量囤积也说明其对 ETH 的兴趣高涨和看好, ETH ETF 的正向流入提振了市场情绪为价格回升至3000美元提供了助力,我认为随着上述因素与以太坊 ETF 流入量转为正值,预计以太坊价格会持续上涨,有望重新测试 3,000 美元并进一步突破。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片