崩盘!比特币四天暴跌一万美元,现在是什么牛市?是大熊吧

币界网Published on 2024-08-03Last updated on 2024-08-03

币界网报道：

先说说今天为什么跌的那么惨，首先是是因为失业率的下降触发了Sahm Rule（萨姆规则），而Sahm Rule的代表就是经济衰退的可能，昨天美股涨，美债跌，币圈跌，是因为资金回到了美股和美债，但今天就是美债跌，美股跌，币圈跌，就连黄金都在跌

说是交易衰退也是没有办法的，但是现在就是衰退了吗？

目前看到的指标只有一个失业率是走高的，但即便是4.3%的失业率在美国来说仍然是较低的水平，失业率上升到5.3%以上才是危险区间，当然有些小伙伴说现在就是经济衰退了只是美国不承认，那我们就要看看全球普遍的经济衰退标准，主要是GDP连续两个季度的下跌，但刚刚过去的第二季度，美国的GDP直接翻倍了

你说你预期到了经济衰退，GDP翻倍的时候你咋不说呢，非农好数据是坏数据，坏数据还是坏数据，这句话我们说了应该超过一年了，现在还在希望失业率增加来刺激美联储的小伙伴该明白是什么意思了吧

那么为什么跌的这么惨，美股都出现了平均2.5%的跌幅，这是因为每周五的资金相对一周的工作日来说，资金量是最低的，所以很有可能是利空，又赶上低资金量，就不可收拾了，其实说到美股还算好，毕竟周五结束后还有两天的冷静期

但 BTC 和 ETH 可能就麻烦一些了，毕竟是7x24小时的，所以到了周末两天价格的波动可能会更大一些，甚至不排除价格的大幅震动

需要注意的还是周末这两天，下周没有重要的宏观数据了，就看情绪的博弈

TOXYt83dnVc1IKXjPKEJCKrhpe08Ln7ZW48sBrjA.png

这一轮周期上半场烂完了，不如开始想一想下半场乃至未来，Crypto世界需要什么

我们手持山寨，现在都是麻木的情绪，现在对任何行情的消息都不感冒了，什么牛和熊的，无所谓了

这情绪跟大熊市底部区域，如出一辙

比特币其实趋势一直很好，从52上了，底部在慢慢提高，难的是山寨，完全弱智跟随大饼，不过都熬到现在了，大家放弃就很不划算

今年9月份大概率就要放水，历年来，大部分都是10月份山寨开启行情，果然又走到了这一步，10月份，还有两个月，也许9月中旬市场就提前开始反应

论大资金叙事，符合条件的链无非BTC、ETH、Tron链（Trc20 USDT） 所以，很多人喊着是不是Infra基建设施过剩。太搞笑了，现在99.99%的基础设施都是垃圾，尤其是以Layer2为首的中心化项目

做着和WBTC一样的封装资产业务，锁住用户的真钱，在自己的中心化L2里1:1发个假筹码。那用户的钱算不算数还不是人家项目方一句话的事情。在Crypto这个黑暗森林里你要我相信项目方不作恶真的太难了

因此，反正行业也烂成这个样子了，到处都是赌场PvP。那有理想的人可以想一想如何更好的去满足“去中心化瑞士银行的这个命题作文

再或者，可以想一想，因特网刚刚诞生的时候，诞生了哪个足够去中心化、足够分布式的应用，直到现在所谓的Web3时期，也有很多人，很多大公司依然在用，在开发，在维护，在创造足够的商业价值

太难熬了兄弟们，我熊市都没有这么难熬过，回调的幅度和时间只是一方面，更多的是对重新认知加密牛市的过程难熬，这点跟大家一样

可以见得，未来每个阶段都是新的，都是以前不曾有过的，未来玩行情要更谨慎，重新定义牛熊

只用实力说话，用价值体现！带精准把控点位，拿捏收益，在币圈行情好的时候你怎么玩都能赚，但是你要清楚的知道币圈的行情不会一直好！！！

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
dos
DAPPOSDOS
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

Why Are Crypto Cards Struggling to Replace Visa?

Encrypted bank cards struggle to replace Visa due to fundamental differences in payment economics. Analysis reveals Visa’s fee is only about 7-9% of the total merchant discount rate (MDR), with the largest share (70-80%) going to issuing banks as interchange fees. Most crypto debit cards, operating on prepaid stablecoins like USDC, lack the credit-based revenue model of traditional reward credit cards. This results in significantly lower interchange income. Even with higher exempt rates for small banks, the total fee pool for a $100 stablecoin debit transaction is only about $0.62, leaving minimal room for profit sharing after covering network, processor, and bank costs. Stablecoins primarily innovate in the back-end settlement layer, enabling near real-time T+0 settlements on networks like Visa and Mastercard instead of the traditional T+2 cycle. This optimizes working capital for issuers but doesn't lower costs for merchants or improve the consumer checkout experience. Card networks are actively integrating stablecoins for settlement, seeing them as a system enhancement, not a threat. While stablecoins can reduce costs in cross-border payments by eliminating intermediaries and forex layers, this logic doesn't translate to domestic card payments where the cost structure is dominated by interchange fees. The core promise of bypassing card networks to save merchants money is flawed, as removing Visa only cuts the smallest fee component.

marsbit4m ago

Why Are Crypto Cards Struggling to Replace Visa?

marsbit4m ago

In the Era of MiCA, Why is the EU CASP License Becoming Increasingly Important?

In the MiCA era, the EU's Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) license is becoming increasingly crucial, especially after the transitional period ends on July 1, 2026. Post-deadline, crypto service providers operating under old national frameworks must either secure MiCA authorization or exit the EU market, rendering the previous model of using a single member state's VASP registration for pan-European operations obsolete. The CASP license fundamentally changes the regulatory landscape by shifting from a fragmented, nation-by-nation registration system to a unified "passporting" regime. Authorized in one member state, a CASP can provide its licensed services across the EU, offering greater legal clarity and operational efficiency compared to the past. MiCA defines CASP authorization based on specific service types, such as custody, trading platform operation, exchange, and transfer of crypto-assets. The scope of authorization is determined by actual business functions, not self-selection, with corresponding prudential requirements like capital adequacy. Banks and institutional clients increasingly value CASP status as it provides a verifiable, standardized framework for due diligence, accessible through ESMA's public registers. The regulation significantly limits the "reverse solicitation" exception for non-EU firms. Active marketing or outreach to EU clients generally necessitates a CASP license, moving away from reliance on offshore entities. It's important to note that a CASP license is not a universal permit; it covers crypto-asset services but does not automatically authorize traditional financial activities like payment services (governed by PSD2) or dealing in financial instruments (governed by MiFID II). A complete crypto-fiat payment solution often requires both a CASP and a licensed payment institution. Priority candidates for pursuing a CASP license include: 1) Platforms with the EU as a primary long-term market; 2) Projects seeking partnerships with EU banks or large institutions; and 3) Groups aiming to consolidate cross-border operations under one regulated entity. In contrast, early-stage projects without concrete EU plans may find the process premature. Ultimately, the growing importance of the CASP stems from the end of regulatory ambiguity in Europe. It has evolved from a consideration to a fundamental requirement for market access, client trust, and sustainable operations within the EU's now-harmonized crypto regulatory framework.

marsbit7m ago

In the Era of MiCA, Why is the EU CASP License Becoming Increasingly Important?

marsbit7m ago

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: Global Semiconductor Equipment WFE Grows 75% in Two Years, DRAM and Logic Chips Are the Biggest Drivers

Bernstein significantly raises its global Wafer Front-End (WFE) equipment spending forecast: $148B in 2026 (from $141B), $204B in 2027 (from $175B), and $259B in 2028 (from $198B). This represents a cumulative 75% growth over two years, confirming a strong equipment upcycle. Memory, especially DRAM, is the primary driver, with DRAM WFE expected to surge 53% in 2027 and 37% in 2028. Logic/Foundry follows, driven by advanced node investments. The forecast upgrades are broad-based, but the largest incremental contribution comes from memory spending outside China and logic/foundry expansion within China. Bernstein expects China's WFE demand to be resilient, jumping to $101B in 2028 from $573B in 2027 due to comprehensive expansion across memory, advanced logic, and mature nodes. A key factor is the DUV lithography shortage, which is expected to ease in H2 2026, allowing imports to recover. Top equipment picks include ASML (preferred in Europe) for its exposure to DRAM and advanced logic, and Applied Materials (top US pick) for its broad exposure and attractive valuation. In China, NAURA is favored due to its comprehensive product portfolio and significant advanced logic exposure. Bernstein views the recent sector pullback as an attractive entry point, arguing that market expectations for 2027/2028 demand strength remain too low and that supplier guidance is conservative.

marsbit8m ago

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: Global Semiconductor Equipment WFE Grows 75% in Two Years, DRAM and Logic Chips Are the Biggest Drivers

marsbit8m ago

The True Cost of Strategy Being Forced to 'Hoard' U.S. Dollars

The article analyzes MicroStrategy's (now Strategy) shift towards holding substantial US dollar reserves (currently $4.65 billion) while selling Bitcoin, contrasting this with its core identity as a Bitcoin-focused company. It argues this move is a strategic necessity specific to Strategy, driven by its unique business model of issuing "digital credit" (preferred securities) with fixed USD dividend obligations. To secure favorable credit ratings (e.g., S&P's B- rating, which penalizes Bitcoin-heavy balance sheets) and sustain this credit issuance, Strategy must demonstrate significant dollar liquidity. However, this cash hoarding imposes a heavy "invisible tax" or opportunity cost: capital allocated to low-yielding cash reserves cannot be deployed into Bitcoin, artificially raising the required return threshold on its actual Bitcoin investments to cover fixed dividend costs. The author concludes that Strategy is an extreme case, and most other Bitcoin-related companies should not blindly emulate this strategy. For them, dollar reserves should be dictated strictly by operational needs and prudent buffers, not arbitrary targets. Holding excess cash typically means forfeiting potential Bitcoin returns for uncertain benefits, making it economically unsound unless a company shares Strategy's specific credit-dependent capital structure. The decision ultimately hinges on a firm's unique business model and genuine cash flow requirements.

marsbit11m ago

The True Cost of Strategy Being Forced to 'Hoard' U.S. Dollars

marsbit11m ago

New Fed Correspondent: Inflation Data 'Neither Hot Nor Cold' Offers Fed Temporary Respite but Future Path Remains Uncertain

Inflation data for July came in as expected, providing the Federal Reserve with some breathing room ahead of its September meeting, though the longer-term policy path remains uncertain. The core CPI rose 0.2% month-over-month and 2.5% year-over-year, in line with forecasts, easing immediate pressure for a rate hike. Following the report, market expectations for a September rate increase fell below 50%. Despite the temporary respite, deep divisions persist within the Fed. At least six of the twelve voting members have recently signaled openness to further tightening, with three having voted for a hike in July. The debate centers on whether current rates are sufficiently restrictive to bring inflation back to the 2% target or if persistent factors like tariffs, energy prices, and surging demand from AI infrastructure necessitate more action. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly highlighted the growing complexity, outlining two potential scenarios: a baseline where inflationary pressures fade, allowing for rates to hold steady, and an alternative where shocks persist and inflation gains self-reinforcing momentum. She suggested that if the latter materializes, the policy response might need to be more aggressive than the typical 25-basis-point increments. With Fed Chair Wash adopting a less forward-leaning public stance, markets are closely monitoring data and other officials' comments for clues. The upcoming August CPI report, due just days before the September FOMC meeting, is now seen as a critical determinant for the final decision.

marsbit11m ago

New Fed Correspondent: Inflation Data 'Neither Hot Nor Cold' Offers Fed Temporary Respite but Future Path Remains Uncertain

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions