如果非要在SOL和ETH上面选一个 冲哥选以太坊

币界网Published on 2024-08-03Last updated on 2024-08-03

币界网报道:

最近很多人在问冲哥SOL和以太坊哪个公链更好!还有人说 Solana 将取代以太坊成为主要的 L1。问冲哥更看好哪个?包括以太坊的ETF通过了,下一个是不是SOL的ETF!!!不可否认的是SOL最近的热度确实很高,下面冲哥来给大家讲解一下SOL的最新情况!

SOL的情况冲哥之前也一直讲过,他就是一个巨大的泡沫,为啥这样说呢,我们来看一下数据:

  • FTX Estate 仍有 4100 万 SOL(76 亿美元)锁定。其中 750 万(14 亿美元)将于 2025 年 3 月解锁,另外每月将解锁 60.9 万枚SOL(1.13 亿美元),直至 2028 年。大多数代币的购买价格似乎约为每枚 64 美元

    这些冲哥之前的文章是多次提到的,到后面就全部都是抛压,行情好恐慌情绪会好一点,行情不好SOL跌下来就是下一个FIL!!一点都不夸张,你们可以看一下灰度的ETF几十亿美金对于以太坊造成的恐慌情绪有多重!再来看看SOL你就应该懂了!

    截至目前灰度ETF还有价值62.7亿的ETH没有转换,已经转换了20多亿美金!!把这个体量放到SOL上你在脑补一下!

bhYki8HjxCgRAJePjh9wlhxy4ugyEOgv8NdXE4jA.png

这个时候可能很多喷子就会说你看SOL链上的土狗或者百倍币有多少,他怎么怎么厉害,冲哥来给你看数据!

目前以太坊过去七天在 EVM DEX 交易量中所占的份额还是45.7%!

4UtkmfCoZyhJdAyItUqdnmzB4VYT3pjXlmUHRvOu.png

SOL的交易量我们也可以看一下

eAIlmBYPUNKmW6fv7EQbzCDdQsp22RNcq6IhrZVo.png

ETH 拥有 800 亿美元的稳定 TVL,而 SOL 仅为 32 亿美元。

我认为,稳定币(以及更广泛的)TVL 是一个比低费用平台上的交易量/费用更难操控的指标,它只显示了游戏中有多少真金白银。

SOL现在链上交易机器人和跑路的土狗比较多,SOL指标被严重夸大了,在过去 24 小时内,Raydium 标准 LP 上有超过 50 个交易量超过 250 万美元的跑路项目,总共产生了超过 2 亿美元的交易量和超过 50 万美元的费用。Orca 和 Meteora 的跑路似乎要少得多,而我在 Uniswap (ETH) 上很难找到任何具有任何有意义交易量的跑路项目。

显然,Solana 上的跑路项目存在严重问题,其影响有多种:

考虑到异常高的交易与用户比率以及链上虚假交易/欺诈交易的数量,似乎绝大多数交易都是非人类的。主要 ETH L2 上最高的每日交易与用户比率为 15.0 倍,在 Blast 上(费用同样低廉,而且用户正在耕种 Blast S2)。粗略比较一下,如果我们假设真实的 SOL 交易与用户比率与 Blast 相似,那就意味着 Solana 上超过 93% 的交易(以及费用)都是非人类的。

这些骗局之所以存在,唯一的原因是这样做有利可图。因此,用户损失的金额至少等于产生的费用+交易成本,每天高达数百万美元。

一旦部署这些骗局变得无利可图(即当实际用户厌倦了亏损),你会预计大部分交易量和费用收入都会下降。

SOL链上的用户、GAS费用和DEX量都被严重夸大了。

Solana 上的 MEV 处于一个独特的位置。与以太坊不同,它没有内置的内存池;相反,像Jito创建了(现已弃用的)协议外基础设施来模拟内存池功能,从而允许 MEV 机会,例如抢先交易、夹层攻击等。

Solana的问题在于,交易的绝大多数代币都是波动性极高、流动性低的memecoin,交易者通常会将交易滑点设置为 >10%,以确保交易成功执行。这为 MEV 提供了一个有利可图的攻击面来获取价值:

虽然从最严格的意义上来说,这是“真实”价值,但 MEV 只有在有利可图的情况下才会实施,即只要散户继续进来玩(并净亏损)MEME。一旦MEME开始冷却,MEV 费用收入也会崩溃。

我看到很多 SOL 论文都在讨论基础设施建设最终将如何轮换,比如JUP,JTO等等。这很有可能,但值得注意的是,它们的波动性更低,流动性更高,根本无法提供相同的 MEV 机会。

经验丰富的玩家会受到激励,构建最好的基础设施以利用这种情况。在我研究的过程中,一些消息来源提到这些玩家投资控制mempool空间,然后将访问权出售给第三方的传闻。但我无法证实这一信息。

然而,其中存在一些明显的不正当动机——通过将尽可能多的 memecoin 活动引导到 SOL,它允许精明的个人继续从MEV、memecoin的内幕交易以及SOL价格上升中获利。

SOL行情好的时候问题不大,行情不好的时候,或者等到FTX的SOL解锁的时候就是大量的抛压,长线冲哥不建议持有SOL,如果非要在SOL和ETH上面选一个,冲哥选以太坊!

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手4h ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手4h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit7h ago

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit7h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

Morgan Stanley raised its price target for SanDisk (SNDK) from $1100 to $1750 on June 22, maintaining an Overweight rating. The upgrade is driven by AI inference demand reshaping the NAND market, particularly for KV Cache and context window storage in cloud data centers. These cloud clients exhibit price inelasticity and sign long-term contracts, granting SanDisk significant pricing power. SanDisk's New Business Model (NBM) agreements, covering over one-third of FY27 bit shipments with 3-5 year terms and fixed price/price collar structures, are crucial. They are projected to sustain gross margins around 80% even at floor prices, providing a buffer against cyclical downturns. Morgan Stanley forecasts gross margins to surge from 30.3% in FY25 to 86.7% in FY27e. With NAND supply expected to remain tight into 2026/2027 and cloud/data centers becoming the largest end-market, SanDisk holds supply-side pricing power. The company targets 15-19% bit growth via technology transitions, not capacity expansion. Revenue is projected to grow ~6.6x from FY25 to FY27, with EPS rising from $2.74 to $14.73, driven by high-margin cloud business. Key upside catalysts include faster enterprise SSD adoption and edge AI growth. Downside risks involve slower industry growth, competitor capex increases, market share loss, and competition from Chinese players like YMTC. The investment thesis rests on AI-driven structural demand, NBM's margin protection, and sustained supply tightness. The $1750 target implies ~28x FY27e P/E.

marsbit8h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片