尽管受到制裁,以太坊混合器Tornado现金在2024年仍收到近20亿美元

币界网Published on 2024-07-20Last updated on 2024-07-20

币界网报道:

在2024年的前六个月,已有超过19亿美元存入以太坊混合器Tornado Cash(TORN)。尽管7月份的情况有所放缓,但根据加密分析服务Flipside提供的数据,该协议似乎只吸引了价值6510万美元的存款。

鉴于龙卷风现金作为混合器的性质,用于判断生态系统活动水平的总价值锁定(TVL)指标并不可靠。总锁定价值是指已存入去中心化应用程序的资产价值。这就是为什么TVL通常不用于衡量龙卷风现金的活动。预期的用例是存入资金,然后提取匿名资金,而不是像大多数去中心化金融服务那样将其长时间保存在协议中。

尽管如此,龙卷风现金TVL的DeFiLlama数据显示了相当大的增长,该协议从今年开始低于160000 ETH,目前接近168600 ETH。以美元计算,考虑到资产价值的增长,这是从3.744亿美元增长到目前的5.7282亿美元。

什么是龙卷风现金?

Tornado Cash是一款硬币混合器,旨在保护加密货币用户的隐私。该协议使用零知识证明加密技术,将用户存款匿名化,并允许他们提取到无法追溯到旧地址的新地址。

以太坊混合器已经看到与重大黑客攻击相关的钱包流入,包括Poloniex黑客在5月初向混合器发送价值330万美元的以太坊(ETH)的黑客。由于与黑客攻击有关的交易,包括一些据称与朝鲜有关的交易,美国财政部于2022年8月初批准了龙卷风现金。

随后,对Tornado Cash开发商进行了漫长的法律起诉,这被大多数加密货币社区视为一次重大的越权。这起诉讼仍在进行中,上周的一项裁决不顾控方的反对,推迟了对Tornado Cash联合创始人Roman Storm的洗钱审判。

Coinbase首席法律官Paul Grewal在4月份表示,美国财政部将Tornado Cash的滥用归咎于开发商和TORN持有人,这是“将旧法律弯曲到了极限”。

他当时表示,不可变的开源软件代码不是财产,这给财政部带来了真正的问题,因为财政部只被授权监管外国公民感兴趣的“财产”。

以太坊联合创始人Vitalik Buterin在5月下旬表示,Tornado Cash开发商Alexey Pertsev被判处64个月监禁“真的很不幸”,并继续支持以隐私为中心的加密工具,鼓励人们开发“下一代”解决方案。

他在柏林DappCon的炉边谈话中说:“我认为很多人一直在假设[……]仅仅构建软件是可以的,这是一种完全合法和正当的方式来争取隐私。”

由Stacy Elliott编辑。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbit11m ago

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbit11m ago

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbit14m ago

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbit14m ago

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbit16m ago

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbit16m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片