灰度以太坊迷你ETF获得美国证券交易委员会的绿灯

币界网Published on 2024-07-17Last updated on 2024-07-17

币界网报道:

美国证券交易委员会已批准加密资产管理公司Grayscale的迷你以太坊交易所交易基金(ETF)。

周三,随着资产管理公司ProShares的以太坊ETF获得批准,绿灯亮了。

美国证券交易委员会在5月份出人意料地同意了Grayscale和其他一长串资产管理公司推出以太坊现货ETF的提议。

Grayscale最初的提议是将其长期存在的Grayscale以太坊信托转换为现货以太坊ETF。该加密基金目前的运作方式类似于封闭式基金,赎回股票更难。

然后,它申请了迷你信托,该信托将以目前支持更大ETF的资产作为种子。

彭博资讯ETF分析师James Seyfart在X(又名推特)上表示,该迷你基金“应有助于缓解大型基金转换后可能出现的一些灰度级资金外流”。

Grayscale在给Decrypt的一份声明中表示:“Grayscale很高兴与大家分享,美国证券交易委员会已经批准了Grayscale以太坊迷你信托的19b-4表格。”。“Grayscale团队继续与美国证券交易委员会工作人员进行建设性接触,因为我们正在寻求美国现货以太坊ETP的全面监管批准,我们将酌情分享更多信息。”

Seyfart预测,该基金现在可能会在下周开始与其他产品一起交易。周一消息人士向Decrypt证实,以太坊ETF可能会在7月23日开始交易。

去年,在加密货币行业的一个具有里程碑意义的时刻,一名法官在诉讼中支持该公司,同意该公司的观点,即华尔街最大的监管机构在多年的否认后,对于拒绝其转换为比特币ETF的提议缺乏一个连贯的解释。

该裁决为美国证券交易委员会为发现比特币ETF开了绿灯铺平了道路。

今年1月,美国证券交易委员会批准了Grayscale将其比特币信托转换为比特币ETF的提议。Grayscale还有一个迷你比特币ETF,其费用低于其旗舰比特币产品。

即将推出的以太坊迷你ETF的费用尚未披露。

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片