以太坊价格分析:这是7亿美元的信号,推动ETH达到4000美元

币界网Published on 2024-07-17Last updated on 2024-07-17

币界网报道:

以太坊价格在2024年7月17日星期三达到3517美元的峰值,标志着在过去12天的交易中反弹了25%;链上数据显示,ETH 2.0网络上的赌注增加可能是一个关键的看涨催化剂。

以太坊价格在7月23日预计推出ETF之前飙升25%

围绕7月23日可能推出以太坊ETF的预期是以太坊最近价格飙升的重要驱动力。

在最近非农就业和消费者价格指数(CPI)数据中温和的宏观经济指数的进一步推动下,围绕ETH的市场情绪变得异常乐观,因为投资者期待机构参与度的提高和美联储在2024年下半年降息。

以太坊价格走势| ETHUSD |交易视图

上图显示了在7月5日的市场崩盘期间,ETH价格如何跌至2815美元的100天低点。但自温和的NFP数据发布以来,多头交易员在周末进入疯狂买入,推动以太坊价格回升至3000美元以上。

然而,在7月15日星期一,以太坊ETF即将于7月23日推出,这引起了新闻片的关注。预期的ETF流入带来的看涨逆风使以太坊价格本周反弹进入第二档。

在7月17日撰写本文时,以太坊的价格已经突破了3517美元的区域,比7月5日的历史低点上涨了25%。由于距离以太坊ETF的推出日期还有近一周的时间,投机者押注于4000美元区间的进一步上涨。

以太坊ETH 2.0权益持有者在7天内已存入7亿美元

过去几天推动以太坊价格走势的另一个重要催化剂是ETH投资者增加的质押存款。自彭博社分析师强调7月23日为可能的推出日期以来,投资者增加了对ETH 2.0信标链质押合约的大量存款。

下图跟踪了以太坊区块链网络的官方数据,显示了ETH 2.0信标链合约中存放的ETH硬币数量的每日变化。在投资者认为有效收益率比其他替代方案更有利可图的时期,或者当他们对项目的增长轨迹越来越有信心的时候,通常会增加赌注。

截至2024年7月17日的以太坊20笔质押存款Beaconchain

截至7月10日,投资者在以太坊2.0质押合约中共质押了32919270个ETH。但在连续的鸽派NFP和CPI宏观经济报告以及宣布的ETH ETF发布数据之后,以太坊投资者通过增加质押存款做出了反应。

在撰写本文时,质押资金总额现已达到33124709 ETH,反映了过去七天内增加了205439 ETH。由于多种原因,在市场上升趋势期间增加赌注被解释为看涨信号。

首先,这表明尽管以太坊价格攀升至月度时间框架峰值,但大多数投资者仍希望投入更多资金,并坚持未来收益,而不是现在卖出。卖方压力的下降可能会鼓励犹豫不决的新进入者在未来几天买入ETH。

更重要的是,当新质押的205439个ETH按当前价格估值时,这意味着投资者有效地从短期市场供应中撤出了价值超过7.11亿美元的流动性。

本质上,如果投资者继续通过增加700美元的以太坊2.0质押存款来减轻抛售压力,随着需求在7月23日ETF推出日期之前上升,ETH价格可能会进一步上涨至4000美元。

总之,对以太坊ETF的预期增加和ETH 2.0质押存款的大幅增加正在推动以太坊价格创下新高。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit58m ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片