Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-06-19Last updated on 2024-06-19

Abstract

期货交易量与现货市场和链上转移量一样出现了下降,这表明投机兴趣相对较低,而固定基差交易和套利头寸占据主导地位。

原文作者:UkuriaOC、CryptoVizArt, Glassnode 

原文编译:陶朱,金色财经

摘要:

· 尽管价格走势混乱,但投资者的盈利能力依然强劲,平均每枚代币的未实现利润约为 120% 。

· 需求方足以吸收卖方压力和 HODLer 撤资,但不足以促进进一步的向上增长。

· 现货和套利交易仍在继续,尤其是机构交易员的增加,这暂时增强了区间交易的预期。

市场盈利能力保持强劲

横向价格波动往往表现为投资者的厌倦和冷漠,这似乎是所有比特币市场的主导反应。BTC 价格正在一个成熟的交易区间内盘整。投资者仍然处于普遍有利的地位,超过 87% 的流通供应量处于盈利状态,成本基础低于现货价格。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

利用 MVRV 指标,我们可以评估普通投资者持有的未实现利润的规模。

目前,普通代币持有的未实现利润约为 +120%,这是之前市场在前一周期 ATH 附近交易的典型情况。MVRV 比率仍高于其年度基线,表明宏观上升趋势保持不变。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

我们可以使用 MVRV 比率来定义定价区间,以评估投资者盈利能力相对于长期平均值的极端偏差点。从历史上看,突破 1 个标准差与长期宏观顶部形成一致。

目前,BTC 价格正在 0.5 到 1 个标准差范围内稳定和盘整。这再次凸显了尽管最近市场状况波动,但普通投资者仍持有统计层面的高利润。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

当市场果断突破 2021 年 ATH 时,出现了大量投资者分配,主要由长期持有者群体推动。这反映了可观的利润,这有助于增加活跃交易和流动性供应。

通常,在新的 ATH 之后,市场需要充足的时间来整合和消化引入的供应过剩。随着平衡的建立,这会导致已实现利润和卖方压力的下降。

卖方压力和获利回吐的减少自然会降低市场阻力。尽管如此,自 3 月 ATH 以来,BTC 价格一直无法维持明显的上涨势头。这表明,虽然需求方足够稳定以保持市场区间波动,但最终增长不足以重新建立上涨势头。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

交易量低迷

尽管投资者盈利能力良好,但在创下历史新高之后,比特币网络上处理和转移的交易量却大幅下降。这凸显了投机欲望的减弱和市场犹豫不决的加剧。

在评估各大中心化交易所的现货交易量时,也可以观察到类似的情况。这表明链上网络结算量和交易量之间存在很强的相关性,反映出投资者的厌倦情绪。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

交易所活动大幅下降

再深入一层,我们可以检查以 BTC 面额计价的交易所的链上流入量,我们再次注意到活动量大幅减少。

目前,短期持有者每天向交易所发送约 17, 400 BTC。然而,这明显低于 3 月份市场达到 73, 000 美元高点时记录的 55, 000 BTC/天的峰值,当时投机水平变得过高。相反,长期持有者流入交易所的数量相对较低,目前每天仅有 1000+ BTC 的微不足道的流入量。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

我们可以通过长期持有者余额发送到交易所的百分比来直观地看到 LTH 投资者活动的急剧下降。

LTH 将其总持有量的不到 0.006% 发送到交易所,这表明该群体已达到平衡,需要更高或更低的价格来刺激进一步的行动。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

目前,获利(11000 BTC)的代币转移量多于亏损(8200 BTC)的代币转移量。这表明,尽管幅度相对较小,但总体上仍存在以获利为主导的倾向。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

目前,发送到交易所的平均代币分别实现约 +5.5 万美元的利润和 -735 美元的损失。这使得平均利润比损失高出 7.5 倍,只有 14.5% 的交易日记录了更高的比率。

这意味着HODLers 仍在撤资,需求足以吸收卖方压力,但不足以推高市场价格。这表明市场结构对区间交易者和套利策略更有利,而不是方向性和趋势交易策略。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

现金和套利基础交易

另一个使我们能够描述现货市场的工具是现货累计交易量增量 (CVD)。该指标描述了市场接受者买入量与卖出量的净偏差,以美元为单位。

目前,净卖方偏差主导现货市场,但市场继续呈横盘趋势。这与上述观点相吻合,即需求方大致相当于卖方压力,使市场保持区间波动。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

评估期货市场时,我们注意到未平仓合约持续上涨,目前超过 300 亿美元,略低于之前的最高水平。然而,正如 WoC-23 中所强调的那样,这部分未平仓合约的很大一部分与市场中性的现货和套利交易有关。

在区间波动的市场中,未平仓合约的增加可能意味着波动性捕捉策略的增加,因为交易者可以从永续掉期、期货和期权市场中获得溢价。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

芝加哥商品交易所未平仓合约大幅增长,凸显了机构投资者的参与度不断提高。芝加哥商品交易所目前持有超过 100 亿美元的未平仓合约,占全球市场份额的近三分之一。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

与未平仓合约的增加形成鲜明对比的是,期货交易量与现货市场和链上转移量一样出现了类似的下降。这表明投机兴趣相对较低,而固定基差交易和套利头寸占据主导地位。

Glassnode:市场波动剧烈,但普通BTC投资者仍保持盈利

总结

尽管市场波动剧烈,但普通比特币投资者仍然基本保持盈利。然而,投资者的决断力有所下降,现货、衍生品市场以及链上结算的交易量都在萎缩。

需求和卖方似乎已经建立了平衡,导致价格相对稳定,波动性明显降低。市场走势的停滞导致投资者感到一定程度的无聊、冷漠和犹豫不决。从历史上看,这表明,无论是朝哪个方向决断价格变动都是刺激下一轮市场活动的必要条件。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手5m ago

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手5m ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手1h ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit1h ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

450 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片