Bankless创始人:以太坊是否会错过这轮牛市,你站哪边?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-05-11Last updated on 2024-05-11

Abstract

硬币的正面是以太坊基本面向好,反面是新用户并不选择以太坊,以太坊长期主义者该如何思考?

原文作者 | Ryan Sean Adams

编译 | Golem

Bankless创始人:以太坊是否会错过这轮牛市,你站哪边?

加密资讯与研究平台 Bankless 创始人 Ryan Sean Adams 在 X 平台发起了对以太坊是否会错过这轮牛市的讨论,其表示他首先将站在以太坊长期主义者的角度来思考这件事情,而不是站在那些错误地坚信以太坊已经死亡的人的角度来看待。

他将错过与不错过这两种观点的理由都进行了陈述,并最后询问大家会站哪一边?下面 Odaily 星球日报将两个观点编译如下,读者们也来投投票吧。

以太坊会错过这轮牛市:新用户并不选择以太坊

以太坊正处于青春期,像少年一样正在经历一个尴尬的情绪波动阶段,试图迈向成年但世界却不理解他。

最大的因素是 L2。 这个周期的以太坊与过去不一样,因为它基本上在告诉新用户:“嘿,别用以太坊,我们太贵了,但好消息是我们有 100 个全新的 L2,你会喜欢它们的。” 于是无数的L2搭跨链桥,然后分散流动性,最后以失败告终并如此循环往复。

但从长远来看,发展以太坊 L2 是正确的,是实现去中心化的最佳长期方式,也是 Vitalik 的愿景等等。这些事情不必在重复告诉一个从 2021 年就一直相信这一点的人。但问题是,他们并不是 ETH 的新买家。

那么新买家应该是谁?是那些炒 meme 币的人、App 用户和从传统金融来的人。

但是前两者正忙着在他们正在使用的链上购买代币,而 L2 beat 上显示有 96 条可供选择使用的链。最后从传统金融来的人正在购买比特币,他们不会在乎链上有多少真正的现金流。

虽然流动性分散的问题正在被解决,基本面也很重要。但是现在是以太坊的青春期,当一些链在走捷径时,以太坊要咬紧牙关,走艰难的道路,经历必要的尴尬阶段,以便成为一条成熟且运作良好的链。

这是一件长期的事情,但在这个周期不会有回报。

ETH 牛市即将到来:基本面向好,以太坊具有主导地位

另一部分人会反驳第一种观点,并认为在 BTC 牛市来临后,ETH 即将到达 1 万美元。

现在的以太坊与 2020 年阶段相比强太多。它不仅是一条盈利的区块链,而且还具有坚实的代币经济学,全球最大的交易所都在做以太坊 L2,ZkEVMs 也已经实现,无限的 L2 预算正在加速以太坊技术的发展,以太坊 ETF 也即将推出,贝莱德的代币化国债等等。以太坊的基本面正积极向好。

可能某些链有 100 万用户,但是以太坊可以是 1000 条链的底层基础设施,每条链上 100 万用户的手续费都将回归到以太坊。L2 分散的流动性也会被融合,因为 L2 链正在积累庞大的中心化债务,他们以后会还给以太坊,通过 Gas 向以太坊付费。

对于那些看中 BTC 新叙事的投资者,他们醒悟过来并开始重视现金流只是时间问题。

总之认为以太坊会错过这个牛市是很愚蠢的,而且可能性太小,几乎不值得考虑。市场会主动投票,所以 ETH 牛市即将到来。

以上便是以太坊长期主义的两种不同观点,会错过这个周期还是 ETH 牛市即将到来,你站在哪一边?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

IOSG Founder: Ethereum Doesn't Need Another Leap of Technical Faith, It Needs a Musk-style Compromise

Jocy, founder of IOSG Ventures, argues that Ethereum does not need renewed technological faith but a "Musk-like compromise." The recent formation of ETHLabs—funded by major ETH holders like BitMine and Lubin—highlights a market-driven move to fill a gap left by the Ethereum Foundation (EF), signaling a loss of confidence in its decentralized, hands-off approach. The core critique contrasts Vitalik Buterin's (V) idealistic, technology-first vision with Elon Musk's pragmatic, business-driven execution. The author asserts Ethereum's current shortage is not another technical roadmap but a clear, real-world application narrative and a leader willing to engage directly with commercial realities—like Musk. Internal issues are emphasized, citing EF's management problems and talent drain. While the new decentralized model with independent nodes like ETHLabs addresses the single foundation's limitations, it risks fragmentation without cohesive direction. True cohesion, the author suggests, must come from a shared, compelling narrative around ETH's value, not just from aligned financial interests. Independence claims for new entities are seen as aspirational, needing years of transparency to build trust. The ultimate threat is not competitors like Solana, but the broader shift of attention and talent toward AI. Ethereum has a limited window—12 to 18 months—to recapture focus by delivering tangible, real-world applications. The conclusion urges V to shift from abstract ideals to grounded, pragmatic leadership. The time for this crucial pivot is running out.

marsbit1h ago

IOSG Founder: Ethereum Doesn't Need Another Leap of Technical Faith, It Needs a Musk-style Compromise

marsbit1h ago

Google Starts Selling TPUs, Big Tech Aims to Produce "Low-Cost Tokens" with AI Chips

Google has begun selling its proprietary TPU chips and AI computing hardware directly to third-party data centers and clients, marking a strategic shift. Previously only accessible via cloud rentals, TPUs are specialized processors designed for the matrix and tensor operations central to AI models. By combining thousands into supercomputing clusters managed by CPUs, Google achieves high-efficiency AI processing. This move enables Google’s Gemini AI to offer competitive token pricing, challenging rivals like OpenAI. It also signals a broader industry trend where AI compute is becoming a commoditized resource like electricity. While NVIDIA remains dominant with its CUDA ecosystem and high-performance GPUs, the focus is shifting from raw power to cost efficiency and system integration. Google’s approach mirrors NVIDIA’s by selling an entire ecosystem—hardware, software, and data center expertise—rather than just chips. This threatens NVIDIA’s grip on the mid-range inference market, where lower-cost, efficient solutions are increasingly demanded. Similarly, cloud providers like Huawei Cloud and Alibaba Cloud in China are developing their own AI chip ecosystems (e.g., Ascend, Zhenwu), packaging chips, clusters, and tools into full-stack solutions. They aim to reduce token costs and capture market share through integrated systems. In summary, the AI infrastructure race is evolving from a competition for the strongest chips to a contest for the most efficient and cost-effective systems. Google’s TPU sales highlight this transition, emphasizing that future success lies in delivering affordable, scalable AI compute as a foundational service.

marsbit1h ago

Google Starts Selling TPUs, Big Tech Aims to Produce "Low-Cost Tokens" with AI Chips

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片